Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ali1872

Ali1872 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

11 October 2015

Suspected sockpuppets


I was thinking about reporting this sock abuser already some time ago, but due to the lack of time, I didn't manage to do so. Basically; they all edit the exact same topics, the accounts are made in rapid succession of each other,( 7 August, 25 August, 8 October), they use the exact same edit summaries almost the entire time, [1]- [2]- [3], etc, etc.) and above all, all almost solely add the same type of pseudo-historically nonsensical info on the exact same biographical articles of the same topic(s).( [4]- [5], etc.)

Notice furthermore how they all use false edit summaries as well, such as writing "corrected grammatical mistake", which usually simply involves the act of changing unsourced content into even more unsourced content, as well as how they all use the exact same reasoning to prevent multiple articles they created themselves from being deleted, by using these sockpuppets together on the AfD in question. [6]- [7]- [8]- [9]- [10], etc.)

Look furthermore also at this example (there are several more if needed) where they beautifully aid each other while also not forgetting to use the exact same edit summaries; ( [11]- [12]- [13])

- LouisAragon ( talk) 00:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The three accounts are  Technically indistinguishable. Blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 04:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

11 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Same edits (circling around "Kashmir" and, specifically, expanding the biographies about invidividuals from "Kashmir")
  • Same target articles, [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
  • Same edit summaries on almost every occasion, e.g.; "corrected a grammatical mistake", [21] [22] [23] [24], or "added another source". [25] [26] [27] [28], or "added one more source". [29] [30] [31]

Same editorial conduct on all terms as you can see.

This stuff is seemingly very important to him, for he even used his socks in the past to prevent one of his articles from being deleted, in fact, the exact same article that his newest sock (WikiDoner) also extensively edited with the same type of edits/edit summaries. - LouisAragon ( talk) 23:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

 Clerk note: The evidence is persuasive: focusing on the same subject area (Kashmiris) and the same pages as previous socks, plus the similar/identical edit summaries ( [32]/ [33]/ [34]/ [35]/ [36]/ [37]/ [38]) and similar sources used in edits ( [39]/ [40]). Admin action requested: Please block this sockpuppet indefinitely. Thanks, GAB gab 22:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC) reply

09 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Same articles. Note that quite a few of these are about very obscure matters, such as Mallinson Girls School.
  • Same habit of adding "Shia", "Agha family", "Kandahar", and "Qizilbash" to various articles, i.e. [41]- [42]- [43]- [44]- [45]
  • Here "Cashmere3" corrected an edit [46] made earlier by "WikiDoner"; [47] Here "Cashmere3" reinstated an edit made by WikiDoner that I had removed in the past per BANREVERT. [48]- [49]
  • EIA; [50]
- LouisAragon ( talk) 17:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk declined - @ LouisAragon: CheckUser information rotates after 90 days, and the newest socks in the archive have not edited in two years. However this seems like a pretty clear-cut case, and the new account is  Blocked and tagged. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 00:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC) reply

23 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


As we speak, new account "Redcapt" is trying to re-create the exact same Kashmir-related article, [51] that was originally made by the sockmaster "Ali1872", but which was deleted per G5. [52] "Renewitzel" is aiding "Redcapt" on the exact same draft, and like Ali1872, hes also solely interested in editing articles related to "Agha/Aga" figures from Kashmir. [53]- [54]- [55]- [56]- [57]- [58]- [59]- [60] So basically: two brand new accounts parroting the exact same edits originally made by the sockmaster and his blocked socks; - LouisAragon ( talk) 15:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

Pink clock Awaiting administrative action Behavioural evidence ties both socks to the blocked master. Please block both indef for block evasion. Cabayi ( talk) 23:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Draft:Agha Ashraf Ali tagged G5. Cabayi ( talk) 21:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ali1872/Archive&oldid=1076199602"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Ali1872

Ali1872 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

11 October 2015

Suspected sockpuppets


I was thinking about reporting this sock abuser already some time ago, but due to the lack of time, I didn't manage to do so. Basically; they all edit the exact same topics, the accounts are made in rapid succession of each other,( 7 August, 25 August, 8 October), they use the exact same edit summaries almost the entire time, [1]- [2]- [3], etc, etc.) and above all, all almost solely add the same type of pseudo-historically nonsensical info on the exact same biographical articles of the same topic(s).( [4]- [5], etc.)

Notice furthermore how they all use false edit summaries as well, such as writing "corrected grammatical mistake", which usually simply involves the act of changing unsourced content into even more unsourced content, as well as how they all use the exact same reasoning to prevent multiple articles they created themselves from being deleted, by using these sockpuppets together on the AfD in question. [6]- [7]- [8]- [9]- [10], etc.)

Look furthermore also at this example (there are several more if needed) where they beautifully aid each other while also not forgetting to use the exact same edit summaries; ( [11]- [12]- [13])

- LouisAragon ( talk) 00:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The three accounts are  Technically indistinguishable. Blocked, tagged, closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 04:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

11 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


  • Same edits (circling around "Kashmir" and, specifically, expanding the biographies about invidividuals from "Kashmir")
  • Same target articles, [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
  • Same edit summaries on almost every occasion, e.g.; "corrected a grammatical mistake", [21] [22] [23] [24], or "added another source". [25] [26] [27] [28], or "added one more source". [29] [30] [31]

Same editorial conduct on all terms as you can see.

This stuff is seemingly very important to him, for he even used his socks in the past to prevent one of his articles from being deleted, in fact, the exact same article that his newest sock (WikiDoner) also extensively edited with the same type of edits/edit summaries. - LouisAragon ( talk) 23:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

 Clerk note: The evidence is persuasive: focusing on the same subject area (Kashmiris) and the same pages as previous socks, plus the similar/identical edit summaries ( [32]/ [33]/ [34]/ [35]/ [36]/ [37]/ [38]) and similar sources used in edits ( [39]/ [40]). Admin action requested: Please block this sockpuppet indefinitely. Thanks, GAB gab 22:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC) reply

09 April 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Same articles. Note that quite a few of these are about very obscure matters, such as Mallinson Girls School.
  • Same habit of adding "Shia", "Agha family", "Kandahar", and "Qizilbash" to various articles, i.e. [41]- [42]- [43]- [44]- [45]
  • Here "Cashmere3" corrected an edit [46] made earlier by "WikiDoner"; [47] Here "Cashmere3" reinstated an edit made by WikiDoner that I had removed in the past per BANREVERT. [48]- [49]
  • EIA; [50]
- LouisAragon ( talk) 17:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk declined - @ LouisAragon: CheckUser information rotates after 90 days, and the newest socks in the archive have not edited in two years. However this seems like a pretty clear-cut case, and the new account is  Blocked and tagged. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 00:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC) reply

23 January 2019

Suspected sockpuppets


As we speak, new account "Redcapt" is trying to re-create the exact same Kashmir-related article, [51] that was originally made by the sockmaster "Ali1872", but which was deleted per G5. [52] "Renewitzel" is aiding "Redcapt" on the exact same draft, and like Ali1872, hes also solely interested in editing articles related to "Agha/Aga" figures from Kashmir. [53]- [54]- [55]- [56]- [57]- [58]- [59]- [60] So basically: two brand new accounts parroting the exact same edits originally made by the sockmaster and his blocked socks; - LouisAragon ( talk) 15:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

Pink clock Awaiting administrative action Behavioural evidence ties both socks to the blocked master. Please block both indef for block evasion. Cabayi ( talk) 23:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Draft:Agha Ashraf Ali tagged G5. Cabayi ( talk) 21:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ali1872/Archive&oldid=1076199602"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE