Both editors share an unusual interest on both Soviet tanks as well as Royalty related articles. [1] [2] Both are Brazilians: the "rj" in "Paulomazzeirj" stands to " Rio de Janeiro" and Ilhador is a Portuguese name. Ilhador has voted on a page move request today and a few hours later Paulomazzeirj did the same. It's odd since Paulomazzeirj hasn't made any edit for almost 2 years. Why would he appear on an article he never contributed today after so long? Lastly, both users seem to enjoy quite a lot moving articles. -- Lecen ( talk) 21:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Lecen ( talk) 21:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I think I can hear something quacking - checked per that, the overlap, and the significant concern of !vote fraud.
WilliamH ( talk) 12:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Socks blocked and tagged and the master blocked for 24 hours. WilliamH ( talk) 12:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
(i) Both Jack Bufalo Head and -Ilhador- follow an unusual campaign to remove the word "decisive" from battle-related infoboxes--see [3] and [4]. (ii) Both Jack Bufalo Head and -Ilhador- make controversial page moves without ever seeking consensus (the edit summary is always : "please discuss it first"): [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9] (Paulomazzeirj was a confirmed sock of -Ilhador-); these moves create a huge mess since they conflate German historical regions with German historical states--see the relevant discussion in my talk-page; also see Cristiano Tomás's complaint about -Ilhador-'s activity. (iii) Jack Bufalo Head restores -Ilhador-'s reverted edits: [10] and [11] (iv) Both Jack Bufalo Head and -Ilhador- keep placing unjustified 'copy edit'-tags in articles about German states--see [12] and [13]. (v) -Ilhador- has already been blocked once for sockmastering; also there is strong evidence that he frequently makes disruptive edits using IPs--see my comment on his talk-page. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 06:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This request for investigation is related to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Turgeis/Archive . -Ilhador-, Turgeis, Moagim, Jack Buffalo Head, and Izraías are apparently the same editor—already blocked many times before for copyright violations and sockpuppeting ( [14]; [15]). He keeps editing the same articles using various IPs (for example 187.14.247.157, 187.15.99.28, 187.15.22.180) and accounts (see also [16]) usually in order to insert original research or get involved in egregious cases of internal copyvio. Usual targets include: [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. He changes government types [22], [23] (confer [24], [25]) to phrases from Europa Universalis III, and engages in the unusual campaign of removing the word "decisive" from battle-related infoboxes ( [26] and [27]): see [28]. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 16:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Endorsing this and requesting a check for sleepers. Dougweller ( talk) 16:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Both editors share an unusual interest on both Soviet tanks as well as Royalty related articles. [1] [2] Both are Brazilians: the "rj" in "Paulomazzeirj" stands to " Rio de Janeiro" and Ilhador is a Portuguese name. Ilhador has voted on a page move request today and a few hours later Paulomazzeirj did the same. It's odd since Paulomazzeirj hasn't made any edit for almost 2 years. Why would he appear on an article he never contributed today after so long? Lastly, both users seem to enjoy quite a lot moving articles. -- Lecen ( talk) 21:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Lecen ( talk) 21:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I think I can hear something quacking - checked per that, the overlap, and the significant concern of !vote fraud.
WilliamH ( talk) 12:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Socks blocked and tagged and the master blocked for 24 hours. WilliamH ( talk) 12:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
(i) Both Jack Bufalo Head and -Ilhador- follow an unusual campaign to remove the word "decisive" from battle-related infoboxes--see [3] and [4]. (ii) Both Jack Bufalo Head and -Ilhador- make controversial page moves without ever seeking consensus (the edit summary is always : "please discuss it first"): [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9] (Paulomazzeirj was a confirmed sock of -Ilhador-); these moves create a huge mess since they conflate German historical regions with German historical states--see the relevant discussion in my talk-page; also see Cristiano Tomás's complaint about -Ilhador-'s activity. (iii) Jack Bufalo Head restores -Ilhador-'s reverted edits: [10] and [11] (iv) Both Jack Bufalo Head and -Ilhador- keep placing unjustified 'copy edit'-tags in articles about German states--see [12] and [13]. (v) -Ilhador- has already been blocked once for sockmastering; also there is strong evidence that he frequently makes disruptive edits using IPs--see my comment on his talk-page. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 06:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This request for investigation is related to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Turgeis/Archive . -Ilhador-, Turgeis, Moagim, Jack Buffalo Head, and Izraías are apparently the same editor—already blocked many times before for copyright violations and sockpuppeting ( [14]; [15]). He keeps editing the same articles using various IPs (for example 187.14.247.157, 187.15.99.28, 187.15.22.180) and accounts (see also [16]) usually in order to insert original research or get involved in egregious cases of internal copyvio. Usual targets include: [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. He changes government types [22], [23] (confer [24], [25]) to phrases from Europa Universalis III, and engages in the unusual campaign of removing the word "decisive" from battle-related infoboxes ( [26] and [27]): see [28]. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 16:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Endorsing this and requesting a check for sleepers. Dougweller ( talk) 16:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)