Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


(Chemistry)

(Chemistry) ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

18 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK - bizarre creation of identical nonsense articles [1], [2], [3]. Might not be malicious intent but clear ignorance of multiple account policy. Drm310 ( talk) 19:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, already blocked for disruptive editing. Listing here for archive purposes. Drm310 ( talk) 14:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk note: WP:DUCK already blocked. Closing to keep page clean; will clean up later. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

20 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, same disruptive editing pattern but now written in Bengali. Drm310 ( talk) 14:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Discovered Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Physics', likely a duplicate investigation of the same master. -- Drm310 ( talk) 16:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk note: closing because this account is already listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Physics'. Will determine which page to archive to after we're done there. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

20 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar usernames, similar nonsense article creations and edit summaries ( [4] [5] [6]). I really don't know what to make of it. Sro23 ( talk) 07:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Related discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry). Almost certain it is the same master at work. -- Drm310 ( talk) 16:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - obivously related users and obviously on a spree of acccount creations. Please check for sleepers and see if an autoblock would be beneficial. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Can also check against these accounts from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry):
Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Collapsing for fresh list. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The following accounts are  Confirmed to each other:

Physics and Chemistry ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) is  Technically indistinguishable from the others.

All blocked.  Clerk assistance requested: Please (re)tag as appropriate and move to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry), as that's the oldest account. Thanks. :-) Katie talk 01:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ KrakatoaKatie: Theory of Physics and Journal of physic don't seem to be blocked. Did you miss them? Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 03:22, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Ivanvector - This account does not exist. Typo? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Theory of physics ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Yup, typo. The 'P' in "physics" is not capitalized. Account is blocked. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Found the other account:
Journal of Physic ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
The 'P' in "Physic" is capitalized on this one. Account is also blocked. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) Gotcha, I figured it out when I went to tag them. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 03:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Fresh result list,  Confirmed:

15 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Based on name and article Physics+, too coincidental not to be a WP:DUCK. Drm310 ( talk) 18:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

25 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, three new accounts all created within an hour of each other; names match pattern of previous socks. Drm310 ( talk) 18:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

​— DoRD ( talk)​ 20:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

27 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Created articles with the same name as the usernames, both cases without context. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 06:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Reminds me of this. Sro23 ( talk) 11:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This is endless. Some of these  Confirmed accounts to (Chemistry) are globally locked already and may already be listed, but it's easier for me to just put them all here. A couple didn't complete registration but I tagged them anyway.
  • Again, I'm sure there's some redundancy in the list but there are just so many. All blocked locally with tags.  Clerk assistance requested: this goes under (Chemistry). Thanks. :-) Katie talk 14:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Never mind. There are September accounts and maybe earlier. Let's have a better look. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Okay, from the list above, Chemistry Center (9/22/2016 19:28) appears to be the oldest. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Hi Katie. Ahhh, okay, I get it now. I just saw the other SPI. It's late for me and I'll check into things tomorrow. This is an odd one. I see Hindi. Maybe this is a misunderstanding. I'll read up on the other SPI, but maybe this person is not a baddie, but rather a bit, well, bananas, or having some issue or something. Maybe we can get someone from Project India to communicate with them to get them to stop. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 15:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Anna Frodesiak: They're numbering in the dozens now. They all belong to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry). As with many sockmasters, they want to say what they want to say and they're willing to go to extremes to do it. Maybe he's not malicious toward the project as some are, but he's certainly self-centered and we can't tolerate it. Katie talk 16:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Hi Katie. I understand. I agree that we cannot tolerate it. Has he spoken anywhere? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 20:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Anna Frodesiak: I don't think so. The ones who aren't malicious often don't engage at all. Katie talk 23:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
@ KrakatoaKatie: True. This is just such an odd one. I wonder if we could get a post to him somehow. Maybe he just doesn't understand how things work and thinks if he throws enough out there, some will stick. Should I dig into globals to see if he communicates elsewhere and maybe prepare a short post in his language helping him see? DENY, save resources, and expect him to give up sooner or later is the alternative. The latter may actually be best. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/(Chemistry)/Archive&oldid=1076198172"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


(Chemistry)

(Chemistry) ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

18 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK - bizarre creation of identical nonsense articles [1], [2], [3]. Might not be malicious intent but clear ignorance of multiple account policy. Drm310 ( talk) 19:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, already blocked for disruptive editing. Listing here for archive purposes. Drm310 ( talk) 14:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk note: WP:DUCK already blocked. Closing to keep page clean; will clean up later. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

20 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, same disruptive editing pattern but now written in Bengali. Drm310 ( talk) 14:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Discovered Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Physics', likely a duplicate investigation of the same master. -- Drm310 ( talk) 16:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Clerk note: closing because this account is already listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Physics'. Will determine which page to archive to after we're done there. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

20 October 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Similar usernames, similar nonsense article creations and edit summaries ( [4] [5] [6]). I really don't know what to make of it. Sro23 ( talk) 07:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Related discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry). Almost certain it is the same master at work. -- Drm310 ( talk) 16:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - obivously related users and obviously on a spree of acccount creations. Please check for sleepers and see if an autoblock would be beneficial. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Can also check against these accounts from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry):
Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Collapsing for fresh list. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The following accounts are  Confirmed to each other:

Physics and Chemistry ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) is  Technically indistinguishable from the others.

All blocked.  Clerk assistance requested: Please (re)tag as appropriate and move to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry), as that's the oldest account. Thanks. :-) Katie talk 01:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply

@ KrakatoaKatie: Theory of Physics and Journal of physic don't seem to be blocked. Did you miss them? Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 03:22, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Ivanvector - This account does not exist. Typo? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Theory of physics ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Yup, typo. The 'P' in "physics" is not capitalized. Account is blocked. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Found the other account:
Journal of Physic ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
The 'P' in "Physic" is capitalized on this one. Account is also blocked. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) Gotcha, I figured it out when I went to tag them. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 03:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Fresh result list,  Confirmed:

15 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Based on name and article Physics+, too coincidental not to be a WP:DUCK. Drm310 ( talk) 18:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

25 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK, three new accounts all created within an hour of each other; names match pattern of previous socks. Drm310 ( talk) 18:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

​— DoRD ( talk)​ 20:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC) reply

27 November 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Created articles with the same name as the usernames, both cases without context. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 06:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Reminds me of this. Sro23 ( talk) 11:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This is endless. Some of these  Confirmed accounts to (Chemistry) are globally locked already and may already be listed, but it's easier for me to just put them all here. A couple didn't complete registration but I tagged them anyway.
  • Again, I'm sure there's some redundancy in the list but there are just so many. All blocked locally with tags.  Clerk assistance requested: this goes under (Chemistry). Thanks. :-) Katie talk 14:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Never mind. There are September accounts and maybe earlier. Let's have a better look. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Okay, from the list above, Chemistry Center (9/22/2016 19:28) appears to be the oldest. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 14:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Hi Katie. Ahhh, okay, I get it now. I just saw the other SPI. It's late for me and I'll check into things tomorrow. This is an odd one. I see Hindi. Maybe this is a misunderstanding. I'll read up on the other SPI, but maybe this person is not a baddie, but rather a bit, well, bananas, or having some issue or something. Maybe we can get someone from Project India to communicate with them to get them to stop. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 15:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Anna Frodesiak: They're numbering in the dozens now. They all belong to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/(Chemistry). As with many sockmasters, they want to say what they want to say and they're willing to go to extremes to do it. Maybe he's not malicious toward the project as some are, but he's certainly self-centered and we can't tolerate it. Katie talk 16:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Hi Katie. I understand. I agree that we cannot tolerate it. Has he spoken anywhere? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 20:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Anna Frodesiak: I don't think so. The ones who aren't malicious often don't engage at all. Katie talk 23:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply
@ KrakatoaKatie: True. This is just such an odd one. I wonder if we could get a post to him somehow. Maybe he just doesn't understand how things work and thinks if he throws enough out there, some will stick. Should I dig into globals to see if he communicates elsewhere and maybe prepare a short post in his language helping him see? DENY, save resources, and expect him to give up sooner or later is the alternative. The latter may actually be best. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/(Chemistry)/Archive&oldid=1076198172"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE