![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
He is a rising composer of contemporary music, with albums on the most prestigious label in the field (Empreintes DIGITALes, and was just finalist at Royal Philharmonic Society Awards (rpsmusicawards.com/2010/shortlists/shortlist1.html) - 87.160.228.32 ( talk) 18:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
The information provided is true. I work for the AP - Davidwilliams007 ( talk) 23:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
the image used here is considered fair use for religious or educational purposes. It was identified as orphaned and deleted, but this is a request for undeletion. - Shakta Scholar ( talk) 02:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
originally deleted for copyright. Received permission from Barney Nichols of "The Signal", to freely use - Belleami ( talk) 16:59, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I have added the necessary references for notability - Litkowsk ( talk) 00:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Biography of the former spouse of an African president - Aengw ( talk) 23:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
I have 1 Reference source - Ericnmk80 ( talk) 16:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
good references - Ojwilliams8 ( talk) 17:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
I have had a couple of biographical pages featured in Wikapedia for about six months, which are useful to readers of the 50 or so books I have written, but for reasons unknown to me the pages/entry has been removed, certainly without my permission, but I have no idea who made the entry in the first place. Could you investigate and if possible undelete the entry please. Richard Larn. richardlarn@tiscali.co.uk - 88.111.9.242 ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
This is an actor of note who has been working in theatre, tv & film for the past 10 years and deserves to be recognised as such. Here are several articles that should verify his deservedness to appear in the venerable institution that is WIkipedia... one of them from your own site..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2006/dec/01/theatre2 http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1499073/ http://www.thelondonword.com/2008/11/the-grandees-box-of-cricks/ http://www.finboroughtheatre.co.uk/archive/therattrap.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rat_Trap http://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/review.php/18171/northanger-abbey http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/801441?view=cast http://www.edinburghguide.com/festival/2001/eif2001/review_toolateforlogic.shtml http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/northanger-rev.htm http://austenblog.com/2007/05/02/i-have-not-forgot-your-description-of-mr-tilney/ http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/rattrap-rev.htm
we need this page on wikipedia and it was deleted by just a couple of people, and they appear to be on sabbatical now ? - Mikemahalo ( talk) 14:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Finally got the gist of WHY the original article was deleted, ok. I am working on a minimal new version here - User:Mikemahalo/Human Design
not quite sure what this page is here, if this is not requests for undeletion, then I got confused by something that led me here appearing to be a place to request undeletion. Never mind, step by step...
Mikemahalo ( talk) 14:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thanks for everyone who commented - the auto bot is coming to archive this, good. I have made a draft and now a new VERY BRIEF and simple article under the more usual name Human Design, and here we go. Mikemahalo ( talk) 12:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Now Penthouse Pet of the Year, which means she now meets WP:N, if not WP:PORNBIO - 86.18.235.20 ( talk) 01:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC) -- 86.18.235.20 ( talk) 01:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The reason why i wish the article was undeleted is because i am having trouble putting in the references. I have read the page on how to put in references but i do not understand it. I had used sources, and all information stated on the article is true. - Tslozac ( talk) 04:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
reasoning -Ozurbanmusic 05:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The reason that Wikipedia should not delete the page, Scarless is because, there is no page for this song where as theres always a page for aong and therefore you cannot delete this page. I hope you understand where I am coming from, thank you
References now inserted - Gbengasesan ( talk) 10:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The article was about an incorporated company in Florida which sells computer parts specially for quiet computer work, one of the first companies of its kind. Therefore, the article had signficance. Though it was unfinished (a stub, by all means), it did not break neutrality, nor did it have an unfair POV. - 169.235.53.116 ( talk) 21:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
TWO editors stated without citation or reference that this image was not free, after it had been here for years, and was intended to be free, was always free, and was never not free. Consensus does not equal 2 editors 'shooting from the hip', and no support for their allegation that this video or a screenshot from it is unfree. - User:Pedant ( talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC) User:Pedant ( talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This project existed in Jaco Costa Rica. The article featured several links to supporting documents on the Web. There was no logical reason to delete the article - it was unbiased and told a very important story about what happened after the project was canceled. - Necterg ( talk) 02:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
The contents describes a fictional concoction, which is not conceptually different from describing Midiclorians ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midiclorian) or the Force ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_%28Star_Wars%29), except if we factor in popularity - Andreba ( talk) 03:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted without waiting for time to tidy it. Apparently previous abuse of this name, a rock band, a business, caused immediate severity way out of proportion, and totally WRONG.
The notability was established by multiple secondary references, there appears to be some challenge to the exact formatting, but they are clear and real. For example - http://www.harpercollins.co.uk/Pages/SearchResultsTitles.aspx?page=2&sdt=1&tts=human%20design
-- Mikemahalo ( talk) 12:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Page was deleted as it didn't have any references. Now some references to published articles have been added. - Vivian2009 ( talk) 13:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This article has been deleted upon controversial claims..The person the article talks about is a leading scholar with important publications and contributions in his field specifically on the DRUZE .
The article is not targeted as a self advertisment I have been to several lectures offered by this person.
The person has held the position of department chair at Dhofar University and has served as a chairman of the history division at the Educational Council for Research and Development ( a well reputed governmnental institution responsible for the states educational program)..
He has written numerous articles in daily newspapers and monthly magazines and his book releases have been mentioned in several important newspapers..
He is an author of several research reports on the Druze and on the history of Lebanon.He has several books (500+ PAGES) which are based on primary sources never used before.
He has several publications as a co-author with scholars who have there name in wikipedia
He satisfies Criteria "5.The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.
and criteria
6.The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic institution or major academic society. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.187.42.157 ( talk • contribs) 18:21, 12 April 2010
I am working on that article right now. It is still not finished. It's gonna get big. But i am not familiar with wikipedia.org, therefore i didnt know about and dont know how to deal with "references". I was just translating the German article into English, so my reference is the German article, if that's appropriate. Thanks. - Freiheitsgedanke ( talk) 16:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Wrote the career and found a reliable source. Everything must be fine now. :)-- Freiheitsgedanke ( talk) 20:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
SFera is national science fiction society of Croatia, which gives national awards for science fiction, publishes the only sf magazine and annual collection, organises the national sf convention, and beside, every croatian sf writer is its member. I think it's very strange to delete the national science fiction society, as small the country is. - Tomsak ( talk) 13:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
14:05, 9 April 2010 Polargeo (talk | contribs) deleted "Tiofoto" (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))
Is it possible to have this page Tiofoto - sent to me. I made the mistake of publishing it before it was ready. It was suppose to be a contribution to the photographers that are mentioned on the page - many of them world famous and most of them not longer with us. I would like to work on the page as to get a "green" light on it.
best regards,
This is copied here from Wikibooks. This is not my personal request. -- Adrignola ( talk) 15:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted in error
We believe our page was deleted by mistake. The administrator responsible for the deletion is apparently no longer with Wikipedia so we did not go through him/her. We simply wish to have the page restored so that we can update it with our new location and other current information.
Thank you. - CCCCommSpec10 ( talk) 15:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
it's a verified web page; therefore all sources are true and correct, the victims are cited on the facebook web page as well that I cited as a source - Dancersindanger ( talk) 22:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
I would enjoy the prospect of having a film of mine have a Wikipedia article, and I will fix it. - Secondtimethesecond ( talk) 02:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
I have references in the article! - Fderik0 ( talk) 06:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
reasoning - Kazanova17 ( talk) 18:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Its correct now - Debutencore1 ( talk) 20:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
This article was deleted on the basis of it being not notable I contend this that after 12 years and three radio series, sell out performances in a theatre, audiences averaging over 1000, and a TV pilot to be broadcast later this year as well as various local charities that we support through caberets etc that we are a notable production company based in the NE of Scotland. Further on line references to Newspapers and the BBC website can be provided if necessary. - Steverance ( talk) 16:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Edguy is a notable power metal band and there is no reason a page about a demo cd (that is available on the internet, even though not official) should be completely deleted . It's amazing you can't find info on this cd on wikipedia. - 189.71.43.189 ( talk) 10:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Edguy is a notable power metal band and there is no reason a page about a demo cd (that is available on the internet, even though not official) should be completely deleted . It's amazing you can't find info on this cd on wikipedia, specially considering 2 songs from this album were re-released in later albums. - 189.71.43.189 ( talk) 10:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
it is for a man that diservse to be respested because he is one of the high ranking politicians in the country of mozambique and for what he has done for the city of maputo and country of mozambique. - Zafeer velji 220 ( talk) 22:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
The given reason for the page's deletion was that it was advertising/promotion. I said nothing about the quality of the food other than the water used in preparation is bottled. Can someone at least restore it to my sandbox and let me know what I need to do for it not to be considered advertising (by the way I am only a diner, and have no idea who the owner is). It was deleted less than a minute after posting...which, in my opinion, is a rush to judgment. Finally, I have searched for other restaurants, i.e. Greens restaurant in San Francisco CA, and found them with descriptions such as "landmark" which is much stronger language than anything used in my article - 122.169.150.210 ( talk) 23:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
subject is notable Wikipedia is improved by the existence of this article, which is about one type of 3D technology and is poorer for not having such an article. This is a technical area and it may not be possible to come up with the numbers of references in the popular media that some editors are insisting on having to prove notability. Further, even within this field (cinema technologies) there is not that much in the way of PRINTED media coverage. The fact is that most of the technical discussions about these things among technicians and users is actually taking place online (places like film-tech.com). How does one assert notability? That doesn't mean that this is such an obscure thing that it doesn't deserve an article. On the contrary, the person coming home from the cinema from seeing a 3D film and recalling the brand name on the glasses and is curious what it means ought to be able to come to Wikipedia and be able to find out.
3D in cinema is all the rage these days and there are a number of technologies which all work in completely different ways. Dolby 3D, Master Image 3D, RealD 3D, XpanD 3D, IMAX 3D all work in different ways. And within the last two weeks there is now also Technicolor 3D, yet another system working in yet another way. The fact that in each case a viewer is handed a pair of glasses doesn't mean they all work the same. I would think a person who is wondering what these terms mean ought to be able to consult his/her friendly Wikipedia and find an article with a brief explanation for each. Most of these others do have articles. This one should too.
I note Wikipedia has an article on "Disney Digital 3D" which isn't even a process at all but just a marketing name they stick on all their 3D movies which are then shown by ALL of the above mentioned systems (except Technicolor 3D...they have not signed up for that as of this writing). Kind of funny that an article about something that is just piece of marketing puff can stay but one about something that is real and in use in hundreds of cinemas should be pulled. And I'm not suggesting removal of Disney Digital 3D. People ought to be able to come here and look it up and see that it's just a name just like they should be able to look up XpanD 3D and learn how it works and why it doesn't need a silver screen when most of the others do and interesting things like that.
I have no vested interest; I do not work for any of these firms, hold stock in them, or profit in any way from their use.
- Filmteknik ( talk) 04:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
please undelete again. it was clearly sourced as world leading technology in active shutter glasses. -- 77.64.143.209 ( talk) 22:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Please userfy. I wish to review deleted work and reuse acceptable content on related topics. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 11:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Note: while I already have this article in my userspace I wish to look at revision history as well. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 11:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
the reason that Helder Antunes's page should not be deleted is because in the original setup of the page, i did the references wrong and i have corrected them. i absoloutly guarentee athenticity of the page as i was requested by Helder Antunes himself to make the page, as he is my father, and i am Christian Antunes. I truely hope that you can re-enstate the page for it is official by the man it is of, with regards, Christian Antunes - Lumastan ( talk) 05:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Does not qualify under CSD G6 - not uncontroversial, and fails CSD noncriteria #16. - 70.29.208.247 ( talk) 05:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
My Name is Aaron Causby and i waqnted to make a page for myself ??? - Geranstel ( talk) 12:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
It was a speedy deletion as a web content. But this is an article about the theatre festival, I intended to add references today, as well as: the name of a theatre in NYC that the event will take place at, as well as specific dates and other details, but the content is not available anymore. There are proofs for the fact it is a theatre festival indeed at the official site and the site of the theatre Official Website [1] - PathfinderPL ( talk) 15:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
It is very easy to verify all of the information posted, I am his son so I did not need to site the information because I did not want to research him so that I could site a source. However, if whoever erased the page took the time to check the legitimacy of the information, they would have seen that it is all correct. If they had even "Googled" his name, all of the information is there.
Bibliography:
Google. 4/11/10. www.google.com - Dahanksta22 ( talk) 19:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
My user page has been deleted speedily due to G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion but i promise not to advertise anymore please please i do not have any other option i have a task with my article that should be done by this monday 18th of april so kindly consider my plea and replace my user page. thanks a lot - AMIC-ORG ( talk) 17:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion by user "C.Fred" was uncontested by Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity, but now grounds for its deletion are questioned by Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity, as to its merits of deletion. C.fred, as a member of Phi Kappa Theta Fraternity, now poses the allegation of potential conflict of interest in the deletion of Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity's Wikipedia entry. On the grounds that C.fred deleted "Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity", the same grounds could be applied to the deletion of "Phi Kappa Theta" - SQUARED to C ( talk) 20:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This page contained objective historical information regarding a well-established company. It was not blatent marketing text. Thank you! - 67.91.201.194 ( talk) 20:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
this is not spam. It is a legitimate action done by various individuals across the country. A few others that are involved in this action can be seen online - http://fellrnr.com/wiki/Modified_Nike_Free, So, for at least me and Ryan, when wearing shoes with a big, cushioned heel we are both heel-strikers, and when that heel is removed, we convert into a midfoot striker (me) and a forefoot striker (Ryan). If humans evolved to run without shoes, then the lack of a heel cushion would seem to be the more natural condition for our bodies, and it makes one wonder why the heel cushion is necessary. http://www.runblogger.com/2009/12/vibram-fivefingers-and-barefoot-running.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1170253/The-painful-truth-trainers-Are-expensive-running-shoes-waste-money.html. We are not the only ones talking about this and would like to have our Wiki post back up so that we can add more to it as well as others to benefit the running public with this knowledge and methodology. Thank you. - Jhowlett12 ( talk) 22:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
suitable references have been found to support the article - Seanjpf ( talk) 01:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a scientific researh corporation used by many college students in their thesis and dissertations to reference new DF technology in pratical use. Artile was probably deleted because a disgruntled person was vandalizing if and people were trying to undo one person's false claims. By deleting the page people who reference this site at MIT and MITRE and other universities will be unable to use this sourece as a legitimit point of reference, because one person is vandalizing it. - 24.175.65.66 ( talk) 21:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This listing is still current as Thomas Peters is growing in popularity with his American Papist blog at CatholicVoteAction.org I am a frequent visitor and reader of his blog. - 71.163.168.87 ( talk) 23:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
please undelete my article "TJ Band" and i will reference it once it is re-posted and i have access to the article I now know how it should be referenced and have the information to reference it - Soden17 ( talk) 14:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
The reason I do not wont this page deleted is because it is not against any of your rules. It is not promoting anything, it is a page of a public mall in the town where I live. I do not see the problem with this article considering there are articles about almost every other mall in the world, so I see no reason to delete this article. - Misterscooby ( talk) 23:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Colorado Dimensional Signs|this is due for deletion in 7 days. I feel that it is pointing toward the fact that they are pioneering this style of signage in Australia. All facts are verifiable, and links point to that. I also liken it to: Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Valley_Signs who did the same in Farmington PA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimaki ( talk • contribs)
We Are The In Crowd are signed to Hopeless Records and are putting out an EP in June. They're always on tour including the full Vans Warped Tour this summer. They were deleted for being a "non-notable band" but are definitely known and people have an interest in learning about them and maintaining a page here. You can see quite a few news items written about them here on Absolutepunk.net, a very popular and notable music news site http://www.absolutepunk.net/tags/we-are-the-in-crowd/ - 98.221.193.226 ( talk) 03:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
images used with permission of the film makers and licence holders - Henryryder ( talk) 09:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I keep trying to get the article "OKed" and the related images uploaded, but this bot keeps deleting them. I'm on the PR committee for the school and have been tasked with creating an appropriate page - including the crest and picture of the school. What more do I need to do to get them allowed!?! - Maxroom ( talk) 20:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
reasoning - 92.0.129.65 ( talk) 02:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Article met required Wikipedia standards for publication - IMG Music 305 ( talk) 05:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
The impersonator pattern is a valid software testing pattern. It doesn't come up a lot in search results, and finding this article to be deleted was NOT helpful. Plus, deleting an entire article for lack of citation seems extreme. - Jakesed ( talk) 10:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
NawlinWiki deleted a legitimate page without giving me anytime to cite the sources. Andrew Edgar won the Best RA Award and this is a national award. I read your policies and it CLEARLY states that you get 10 days to cite a source. Thank you once again for letting one of your 'admins' go crazy with power and delete this article that I put time and effort into. I speak for the entire Ace of Spade Board when I say how offended and dissatisfied with your own rule breaking tyranny. - Samweavertalksalot ( talk) 14:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Edit by creator, and ask for feedback to make it a valid article for Wikipedia. Article was deleted by Speedy Deletion under section G11. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdeed ( talk • contribs) 18:07, April 21, 2010
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
He is a rising composer of contemporary music, with albums on the most prestigious label in the field (Empreintes DIGITALes, and was just finalist at Royal Philharmonic Society Awards (rpsmusicawards.com/2010/shortlists/shortlist1.html) - 87.160.228.32 ( talk) 18:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
The information provided is true. I work for the AP - Davidwilliams007 ( talk) 23:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
the image used here is considered fair use for religious or educational purposes. It was identified as orphaned and deleted, but this is a request for undeletion. - Shakta Scholar ( talk) 02:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
originally deleted for copyright. Received permission from Barney Nichols of "The Signal", to freely use - Belleami ( talk) 16:59, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I have added the necessary references for notability - Litkowsk ( talk) 00:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Biography of the former spouse of an African president - Aengw ( talk) 23:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
I have 1 Reference source - Ericnmk80 ( talk) 16:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
good references - Ojwilliams8 ( talk) 17:07, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
I have had a couple of biographical pages featured in Wikapedia for about six months, which are useful to readers of the 50 or so books I have written, but for reasons unknown to me the pages/entry has been removed, certainly without my permission, but I have no idea who made the entry in the first place. Could you investigate and if possible undelete the entry please. Richard Larn. richardlarn@tiscali.co.uk - 88.111.9.242 ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
This is an actor of note who has been working in theatre, tv & film for the past 10 years and deserves to be recognised as such. Here are several articles that should verify his deservedness to appear in the venerable institution that is WIkipedia... one of them from your own site..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2006/dec/01/theatre2 http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1499073/ http://www.thelondonword.com/2008/11/the-grandees-box-of-cricks/ http://www.finboroughtheatre.co.uk/archive/therattrap.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rat_Trap http://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/review.php/18171/northanger-abbey http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/801441?view=cast http://www.edinburghguide.com/festival/2001/eif2001/review_toolateforlogic.shtml http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/northanger-rev.htm http://austenblog.com/2007/05/02/i-have-not-forgot-your-description-of-mr-tilney/ http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/rattrap-rev.htm
we need this page on wikipedia and it was deleted by just a couple of people, and they appear to be on sabbatical now ? - Mikemahalo ( talk) 14:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Finally got the gist of WHY the original article was deleted, ok. I am working on a minimal new version here - User:Mikemahalo/Human Design
not quite sure what this page is here, if this is not requests for undeletion, then I got confused by something that led me here appearing to be a place to request undeletion. Never mind, step by step...
Mikemahalo ( talk) 14:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thanks for everyone who commented - the auto bot is coming to archive this, good. I have made a draft and now a new VERY BRIEF and simple article under the more usual name Human Design, and here we go. Mikemahalo ( talk) 12:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Now Penthouse Pet of the Year, which means she now meets WP:N, if not WP:PORNBIO - 86.18.235.20 ( talk) 01:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC) -- 86.18.235.20 ( talk) 01:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The reason why i wish the article was undeleted is because i am having trouble putting in the references. I have read the page on how to put in references but i do not understand it. I had used sources, and all information stated on the article is true. - Tslozac ( talk) 04:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
reasoning -Ozurbanmusic 05:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The reason that Wikipedia should not delete the page, Scarless is because, there is no page for this song where as theres always a page for aong and therefore you cannot delete this page. I hope you understand where I am coming from, thank you
References now inserted - Gbengasesan ( talk) 10:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
The article was about an incorporated company in Florida which sells computer parts specially for quiet computer work, one of the first companies of its kind. Therefore, the article had signficance. Though it was unfinished (a stub, by all means), it did not break neutrality, nor did it have an unfair POV. - 169.235.53.116 ( talk) 21:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
TWO editors stated without citation or reference that this image was not free, after it had been here for years, and was intended to be free, was always free, and was never not free. Consensus does not equal 2 editors 'shooting from the hip', and no support for their allegation that this video or a screenshot from it is unfree. - User:Pedant ( talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC) User:Pedant ( talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This project existed in Jaco Costa Rica. The article featured several links to supporting documents on the Web. There was no logical reason to delete the article - it was unbiased and told a very important story about what happened after the project was canceled. - Necterg ( talk) 02:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
The contents describes a fictional concoction, which is not conceptually different from describing Midiclorians ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midiclorian) or the Force ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_%28Star_Wars%29), except if we factor in popularity - Andreba ( talk) 03:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted without waiting for time to tidy it. Apparently previous abuse of this name, a rock band, a business, caused immediate severity way out of proportion, and totally WRONG.
The notability was established by multiple secondary references, there appears to be some challenge to the exact formatting, but they are clear and real. For example - http://www.harpercollins.co.uk/Pages/SearchResultsTitles.aspx?page=2&sdt=1&tts=human%20design
-- Mikemahalo ( talk) 12:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Page was deleted as it didn't have any references. Now some references to published articles have been added. - Vivian2009 ( talk) 13:38, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This article has been deleted upon controversial claims..The person the article talks about is a leading scholar with important publications and contributions in his field specifically on the DRUZE .
The article is not targeted as a self advertisment I have been to several lectures offered by this person.
The person has held the position of department chair at Dhofar University and has served as a chairman of the history division at the Educational Council for Research and Development ( a well reputed governmnental institution responsible for the states educational program)..
He has written numerous articles in daily newspapers and monthly magazines and his book releases have been mentioned in several important newspapers..
He is an author of several research reports on the Druze and on the history of Lebanon.He has several books (500+ PAGES) which are based on primary sources never used before.
He has several publications as a co-author with scholars who have there name in wikipedia
He satisfies Criteria "5.The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.
and criteria
6.The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic institution or major academic society. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.187.42.157 ( talk • contribs) 18:21, 12 April 2010
I am working on that article right now. It is still not finished. It's gonna get big. But i am not familiar with wikipedia.org, therefore i didnt know about and dont know how to deal with "references". I was just translating the German article into English, so my reference is the German article, if that's appropriate. Thanks. - Freiheitsgedanke ( talk) 16:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Wrote the career and found a reliable source. Everything must be fine now. :)-- Freiheitsgedanke ( talk) 20:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
SFera is national science fiction society of Croatia, which gives national awards for science fiction, publishes the only sf magazine and annual collection, organises the national sf convention, and beside, every croatian sf writer is its member. I think it's very strange to delete the national science fiction society, as small the country is. - Tomsak ( talk) 13:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
14:05, 9 April 2010 Polargeo (talk | contribs) deleted "Tiofoto" (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))
Is it possible to have this page Tiofoto - sent to me. I made the mistake of publishing it before it was ready. It was suppose to be a contribution to the photographers that are mentioned on the page - many of them world famous and most of them not longer with us. I would like to work on the page as to get a "green" light on it.
best regards,
This is copied here from Wikibooks. This is not my personal request. -- Adrignola ( talk) 15:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted in error
We believe our page was deleted by mistake. The administrator responsible for the deletion is apparently no longer with Wikipedia so we did not go through him/her. We simply wish to have the page restored so that we can update it with our new location and other current information.
Thank you. - CCCCommSpec10 ( talk) 15:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
it's a verified web page; therefore all sources are true and correct, the victims are cited on the facebook web page as well that I cited as a source - Dancersindanger ( talk) 22:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
I would enjoy the prospect of having a film of mine have a Wikipedia article, and I will fix it. - Secondtimethesecond ( talk) 02:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
I have references in the article! - Fderik0 ( talk) 06:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
reasoning - Kazanova17 ( talk) 18:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Its correct now - Debutencore1 ( talk) 20:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
This article was deleted on the basis of it being not notable I contend this that after 12 years and three radio series, sell out performances in a theatre, audiences averaging over 1000, and a TV pilot to be broadcast later this year as well as various local charities that we support through caberets etc that we are a notable production company based in the NE of Scotland. Further on line references to Newspapers and the BBC website can be provided if necessary. - Steverance ( talk) 16:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Edguy is a notable power metal band and there is no reason a page about a demo cd (that is available on the internet, even though not official) should be completely deleted . It's amazing you can't find info on this cd on wikipedia. - 189.71.43.189 ( talk) 10:14, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Edguy is a notable power metal band and there is no reason a page about a demo cd (that is available on the internet, even though not official) should be completely deleted . It's amazing you can't find info on this cd on wikipedia, specially considering 2 songs from this album were re-released in later albums. - 189.71.43.189 ( talk) 10:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
it is for a man that diservse to be respested because he is one of the high ranking politicians in the country of mozambique and for what he has done for the city of maputo and country of mozambique. - Zafeer velji 220 ( talk) 22:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
The given reason for the page's deletion was that it was advertising/promotion. I said nothing about the quality of the food other than the water used in preparation is bottled. Can someone at least restore it to my sandbox and let me know what I need to do for it not to be considered advertising (by the way I am only a diner, and have no idea who the owner is). It was deleted less than a minute after posting...which, in my opinion, is a rush to judgment. Finally, I have searched for other restaurants, i.e. Greens restaurant in San Francisco CA, and found them with descriptions such as "landmark" which is much stronger language than anything used in my article - 122.169.150.210 ( talk) 23:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
subject is notable Wikipedia is improved by the existence of this article, which is about one type of 3D technology and is poorer for not having such an article. This is a technical area and it may not be possible to come up with the numbers of references in the popular media that some editors are insisting on having to prove notability. Further, even within this field (cinema technologies) there is not that much in the way of PRINTED media coverage. The fact is that most of the technical discussions about these things among technicians and users is actually taking place online (places like film-tech.com). How does one assert notability? That doesn't mean that this is such an obscure thing that it doesn't deserve an article. On the contrary, the person coming home from the cinema from seeing a 3D film and recalling the brand name on the glasses and is curious what it means ought to be able to come to Wikipedia and be able to find out.
3D in cinema is all the rage these days and there are a number of technologies which all work in completely different ways. Dolby 3D, Master Image 3D, RealD 3D, XpanD 3D, IMAX 3D all work in different ways. And within the last two weeks there is now also Technicolor 3D, yet another system working in yet another way. The fact that in each case a viewer is handed a pair of glasses doesn't mean they all work the same. I would think a person who is wondering what these terms mean ought to be able to consult his/her friendly Wikipedia and find an article with a brief explanation for each. Most of these others do have articles. This one should too.
I note Wikipedia has an article on "Disney Digital 3D" which isn't even a process at all but just a marketing name they stick on all their 3D movies which are then shown by ALL of the above mentioned systems (except Technicolor 3D...they have not signed up for that as of this writing). Kind of funny that an article about something that is just piece of marketing puff can stay but one about something that is real and in use in hundreds of cinemas should be pulled. And I'm not suggesting removal of Disney Digital 3D. People ought to be able to come here and look it up and see that it's just a name just like they should be able to look up XpanD 3D and learn how it works and why it doesn't need a silver screen when most of the others do and interesting things like that.
I have no vested interest; I do not work for any of these firms, hold stock in them, or profit in any way from their use.
- Filmteknik ( talk) 04:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
please undelete again. it was clearly sourced as world leading technology in active shutter glasses. -- 77.64.143.209 ( talk) 22:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Please userfy. I wish to review deleted work and reuse acceptable content on related topics. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 11:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Note: while I already have this article in my userspace I wish to look at revision history as well. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 11:19, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
the reason that Helder Antunes's page should not be deleted is because in the original setup of the page, i did the references wrong and i have corrected them. i absoloutly guarentee athenticity of the page as i was requested by Helder Antunes himself to make the page, as he is my father, and i am Christian Antunes. I truely hope that you can re-enstate the page for it is official by the man it is of, with regards, Christian Antunes - Lumastan ( talk) 05:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Does not qualify under CSD G6 - not uncontroversial, and fails CSD noncriteria #16. - 70.29.208.247 ( talk) 05:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
My Name is Aaron Causby and i waqnted to make a page for myself ??? - Geranstel ( talk) 12:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
It was a speedy deletion as a web content. But this is an article about the theatre festival, I intended to add references today, as well as: the name of a theatre in NYC that the event will take place at, as well as specific dates and other details, but the content is not available anymore. There are proofs for the fact it is a theatre festival indeed at the official site and the site of the theatre Official Website [1] - PathfinderPL ( talk) 15:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
It is very easy to verify all of the information posted, I am his son so I did not need to site the information because I did not want to research him so that I could site a source. However, if whoever erased the page took the time to check the legitimacy of the information, they would have seen that it is all correct. If they had even "Googled" his name, all of the information is there.
Bibliography:
Google. 4/11/10. www.google.com - Dahanksta22 ( talk) 19:06, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
My user page has been deleted speedily due to G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion but i promise not to advertise anymore please please i do not have any other option i have a task with my article that should be done by this monday 18th of april so kindly consider my plea and replace my user page. thanks a lot - AMIC-ORG ( talk) 17:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion by user "C.Fred" was uncontested by Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity, but now grounds for its deletion are questioned by Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity, as to its merits of deletion. C.fred, as a member of Phi Kappa Theta Fraternity, now poses the allegation of potential conflict of interest in the deletion of Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity's Wikipedia entry. On the grounds that C.fred deleted "Phi Kappa Pi Fraternity", the same grounds could be applied to the deletion of "Phi Kappa Theta" - SQUARED to C ( talk) 20:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This page contained objective historical information regarding a well-established company. It was not blatent marketing text. Thank you! - 67.91.201.194 ( talk) 20:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
this is not spam. It is a legitimate action done by various individuals across the country. A few others that are involved in this action can be seen online - http://fellrnr.com/wiki/Modified_Nike_Free, So, for at least me and Ryan, when wearing shoes with a big, cushioned heel we are both heel-strikers, and when that heel is removed, we convert into a midfoot striker (me) and a forefoot striker (Ryan). If humans evolved to run without shoes, then the lack of a heel cushion would seem to be the more natural condition for our bodies, and it makes one wonder why the heel cushion is necessary. http://www.runblogger.com/2009/12/vibram-fivefingers-and-barefoot-running.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1170253/The-painful-truth-trainers-Are-expensive-running-shoes-waste-money.html. We are not the only ones talking about this and would like to have our Wiki post back up so that we can add more to it as well as others to benefit the running public with this knowledge and methodology. Thank you. - Jhowlett12 ( talk) 22:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
suitable references have been found to support the article - Seanjpf ( talk) 01:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a scientific researh corporation used by many college students in their thesis and dissertations to reference new DF technology in pratical use. Artile was probably deleted because a disgruntled person was vandalizing if and people were trying to undo one person's false claims. By deleting the page people who reference this site at MIT and MITRE and other universities will be unable to use this sourece as a legitimit point of reference, because one person is vandalizing it. - 24.175.65.66 ( talk) 21:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
This listing is still current as Thomas Peters is growing in popularity with his American Papist blog at CatholicVoteAction.org I am a frequent visitor and reader of his blog. - 71.163.168.87 ( talk) 23:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
please undelete my article "TJ Band" and i will reference it once it is re-posted and i have access to the article I now know how it should be referenced and have the information to reference it - Soden17 ( talk) 14:48, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
The reason I do not wont this page deleted is because it is not against any of your rules. It is not promoting anything, it is a page of a public mall in the town where I live. I do not see the problem with this article considering there are articles about almost every other mall in the world, so I see no reason to delete this article. - Misterscooby ( talk) 23:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Colorado Dimensional Signs|this is due for deletion in 7 days. I feel that it is pointing toward the fact that they are pioneering this style of signage in Australia. All facts are verifiable, and links point to that. I also liken it to: Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Valley_Signs who did the same in Farmington PA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimaki ( talk • contribs)
We Are The In Crowd are signed to Hopeless Records and are putting out an EP in June. They're always on tour including the full Vans Warped Tour this summer. They were deleted for being a "non-notable band" but are definitely known and people have an interest in learning about them and maintaining a page here. You can see quite a few news items written about them here on Absolutepunk.net, a very popular and notable music news site http://www.absolutepunk.net/tags/we-are-the-in-crowd/ - 98.221.193.226 ( talk) 03:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
images used with permission of the film makers and licence holders - Henryryder ( talk) 09:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I keep trying to get the article "OKed" and the related images uploaded, but this bot keeps deleting them. I'm on the PR committee for the school and have been tasked with creating an appropriate page - including the crest and picture of the school. What more do I need to do to get them allowed!?! - Maxroom ( talk) 20:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
reasoning - 92.0.129.65 ( talk) 02:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Article met required Wikipedia standards for publication - IMG Music 305 ( talk) 05:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
The impersonator pattern is a valid software testing pattern. It doesn't come up a lot in search results, and finding this article to be deleted was NOT helpful. Plus, deleting an entire article for lack of citation seems extreme. - Jakesed ( talk) 10:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
NawlinWiki deleted a legitimate page without giving me anytime to cite the sources. Andrew Edgar won the Best RA Award and this is a national award. I read your policies and it CLEARLY states that you get 10 days to cite a source. Thank you once again for letting one of your 'admins' go crazy with power and delete this article that I put time and effort into. I speak for the entire Ace of Spade Board when I say how offended and dissatisfied with your own rule breaking tyranny. - Samweavertalksalot ( talk) 14:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Edit by creator, and ask for feedback to make it a valid article for Wikipedia. Article was deleted by Speedy Deletion under section G11. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdeed ( talk • contribs) 18:07, April 21, 2010