 | Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.
|
Resolved:
as stale
- This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.
- Jcoonrod ( talk · contribs)
- Smeelgova ( talk · contribs)
- Descendall ( talk · contribs)
- Enkido ( talk · contribs)
- Pedant17 ( talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{ RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{ RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- Discussion at The Hunger Project
- Discussion at Joan Holmes
- Request for arbitration filed on 23 June 2006
- Structure for the article that is not inherently biased or misleading
- Equal balance of positive and negative perspectives
- NPOV content in presentation of criticism, and negative/positive commentary
- Determination of what constitutes relevant links
- Allowance for equally weighted positive/negatively balanced links
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. Descendall 01:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Smeelgova 02:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Jcoonrod 07:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree - Pedant17 00:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. -- Enkido 17:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Please note: "Agree" or "disagree" only in this section. If there are issues that need to be raised, like inclusion or exclusion of parties, please ask on the talk page. Essjay ( Talk • Connect) 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Accept.
- For the Mediation Committee, Essjay ( Talk • Connect) 07:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.
|
Resolved:
as stale
- This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.
- Jcoonrod ( talk · contribs)
- Smeelgova ( talk · contribs)
- Descendall ( talk · contribs)
- Enkido ( talk · contribs)
- Pedant17 ( talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{ RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{ RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- Discussion at The Hunger Project
- Discussion at Joan Holmes
- Request for arbitration filed on 23 June 2006
- Structure for the article that is not inherently biased or misleading
- Equal balance of positive and negative perspectives
- NPOV content in presentation of criticism, and negative/positive commentary
- Determination of what constitutes relevant links
- Allowance for equally weighted positive/negatively balanced links
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. Descendall 01:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Smeelgova 02:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Jcoonrod 07:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree - Pedant17 00:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. -- Enkido 17:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Please note: "Agree" or "disagree" only in this section. If there are issues that need to be raised, like inclusion or exclusion of parties, please ask on the talk page. Essjay ( Talk • Connect) 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Accept.
- For the Mediation Committee, Essjay ( Talk • Connect) 07:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.