What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
As several other users of the WikiProject Classical Music, e.g.,
Kleinzach,
Gerda Arendt,
Montanabw and
LazyStarryNights, know, I have update during the previous years update nearly all pages dedicated to
Anton Bruckner's works, created several new ones:
Mass No. 1, Psalms
22,
146,
112 and
114,
Germanenzug, etc., and I was one of authors of the new
List of compositions by Anton Bruckner - a page, which I am updating every time new info is available. I am also in close contact with Hans Roelofs and John Berky, who, via a broad network of contacts, are updating their website on Bruckner's discography on a regular basis. I have a large discography of Bruckner's works, including all versions of the symphonies and other instrumental works, and all vocal works for which at least one commercial or (known) private recording is available. About my contribution to their website see, e.g., "Informanten"
[1] and "Links" on Hans' website, and "First known recording of Pange Lingua (1836)"
[2] on John's website.
I would be you very grateful if you could mediate in the following dragging issue: User:Nikkimaria is currently and systematically holding/removing my input and updates on several pages in the Anton Bruckner's project (current concern:
Rondo in C minor (Bruckner) and
Intermezzo in D minor (Bruckner). The sources which she systematically removed were not self-published, but from reliable sources as e.g., Cornelis van Zwol, Anton Bruckner – Leven en Werken, Thot, Bussum (Netherlands), 2012.
ISBN90-686-8590-2 - a recent anthology of 782 pages on Bruckner's life and compositions (unfortunately only available in Dutch). Van Zwol devoted 20 years of his life to it, having access to Bruckner's original manuscripts and letters, and was during these years regularly in touch with
Leopold Nowak and other scholars (editors of Bruckner's works on the
Bruckner Gesamtausgabe).
I do not understand why Nikkimaria removed repeatedly infoboxes and text coming from that reference and other references concerning e.g., the retrieval of the original manuscripts and their editions.
Just helping to get this request for mediation properly filed, adding emphasis for what I suppose to be the crux of the dispute.
Not sure whether to list others that took part in prior discussions as parties for this mediation, they can be added later if needed. --
Francis Schonken (
talk) 23:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
FYI: Nikkimaria has in the meantime removed again the infobox of
Rondo in C minor (Bruckner). I have not reacted to it. I do not want to fight on and on for it... I have restored some other data, she has left unchanged. --
Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (
To reply) 09:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
As this dispute does not currently meet the
prerequisites for mediation, this filing is not appropriate at this time. These articles were created not even a week ago and discussion is ongoing on the talk pages, where Meneerke or other parties are welcome to participate if they so choose.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 15:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Decision of the Mediation Committee
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is
accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or
rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Recommend rejection: Primary opponent has declined mediation. Probably ought to go to lower-level dispute resolution first, after additional discussion on the article talk pages. —
TransporterMan (
TALK) 13:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC) (Committee member)reply
Reject: Insufficient agreement to mediation. With the requesting editor's primary opponent declining mediation, attempting mediation would be fruitless. For the Mediation Committee. —
TransporterMan (
TALK) 16:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
As several other users of the WikiProject Classical Music, e.g.,
Kleinzach,
Gerda Arendt,
Montanabw and
LazyStarryNights, know, I have update during the previous years update nearly all pages dedicated to
Anton Bruckner's works, created several new ones:
Mass No. 1, Psalms
22,
146,
112 and
114,
Germanenzug, etc., and I was one of authors of the new
List of compositions by Anton Bruckner - a page, which I am updating every time new info is available. I am also in close contact with Hans Roelofs and John Berky, who, via a broad network of contacts, are updating their website on Bruckner's discography on a regular basis. I have a large discography of Bruckner's works, including all versions of the symphonies and other instrumental works, and all vocal works for which at least one commercial or (known) private recording is available. About my contribution to their website see, e.g., "Informanten"
[1] and "Links" on Hans' website, and "First known recording of Pange Lingua (1836)"
[2] on John's website.
I would be you very grateful if you could mediate in the following dragging issue: User:Nikkimaria is currently and systematically holding/removing my input and updates on several pages in the Anton Bruckner's project (current concern:
Rondo in C minor (Bruckner) and
Intermezzo in D minor (Bruckner). The sources which she systematically removed were not self-published, but from reliable sources as e.g., Cornelis van Zwol, Anton Bruckner – Leven en Werken, Thot, Bussum (Netherlands), 2012.
ISBN90-686-8590-2 - a recent anthology of 782 pages on Bruckner's life and compositions (unfortunately only available in Dutch). Van Zwol devoted 20 years of his life to it, having access to Bruckner's original manuscripts and letters, and was during these years regularly in touch with
Leopold Nowak and other scholars (editors of Bruckner's works on the
Bruckner Gesamtausgabe).
I do not understand why Nikkimaria removed repeatedly infoboxes and text coming from that reference and other references concerning e.g., the retrieval of the original manuscripts and their editions.
Just helping to get this request for mediation properly filed, adding emphasis for what I suppose to be the crux of the dispute.
Not sure whether to list others that took part in prior discussions as parties for this mediation, they can be added later if needed. --
Francis Schonken (
talk) 23:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)reply
FYI: Nikkimaria has in the meantime removed again the infobox of
Rondo in C minor (Bruckner). I have not reacted to it. I do not want to fight on and on for it... I have restored some other data, she has left unchanged. --
Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (
To reply) 09:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
As this dispute does not currently meet the
prerequisites for mediation, this filing is not appropriate at this time. These articles were created not even a week ago and discussion is ongoing on the talk pages, where Meneerke or other parties are welcome to participate if they so choose.
Nikkimaria (
talk) 15:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Decision of the Mediation Committee
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is
accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or
rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Recommend rejection: Primary opponent has declined mediation. Probably ought to go to lower-level dispute resolution first, after additional discussion on the article talk pages. —
TransporterMan (
TALK) 13:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC) (Committee member)reply
Reject: Insufficient agreement to mediation. With the requesting editor's primary opponent declining mediation, attempting mediation would be fruitless. For the Mediation Committee. —
TransporterMan (
TALK) 16:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply