What should be done with the special reference system currently in use in many parts of the article series? Put another way, what reference system should be used?
Reverting the page over the objections of others resulting in lost information. (
Talk page link)
Should this remain as one article (as at 2-11-07) or be divided into many subarticles (as at 2-17-07)
Should this article focus on US based racial animosity or be limited to scientific research in this field, with notations to the former
Incivility by Kevin Murray, refusal to apologize, posting usertalk page comments on article talk page.
Does the current article rely too heavily on the acceptation of the two "controversial assumptions" described in the current intro? Should the consequences of not accepting either or both assumptions be spelled out right at the beginning?
Parties' agreement to mediate
All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
For the Mediation Committee,
Shyam(
T/
C) 06:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Due to private request, I will take this one. I'll post a few comments on the talk page, where mediation will proceed.
KillerChihuahua?!? 17:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
What should be done with the special reference system currently in use in many parts of the article series? Put another way, what reference system should be used?
Reverting the page over the objections of others resulting in lost information. (
Talk page link)
Should this remain as one article (as at 2-11-07) or be divided into many subarticles (as at 2-17-07)
Should this article focus on US based racial animosity or be limited to scientific research in this field, with notations to the former
Incivility by Kevin Murray, refusal to apologize, posting usertalk page comments on article talk page.
Does the current article rely too heavily on the acceptation of the two "controversial assumptions" described in the current intro? Should the consequences of not accepting either or both assumptions be spelled out right at the beginning?
Parties' agreement to mediate
All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
For the Mediation Committee,
Shyam(
T/
C) 06:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Due to private request, I will take this one. I'll post a few comments on the talk page, where mediation will proceed.
KillerChihuahua?!? 17:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.