C.Fred and Closeapple removed my contributions because I did not cite anything. My argument is that the vast majority of the article lacks citations. If my contributions can be removed, then every un-cited sentence, to preserve fairness to me, has to be removed from the article and from Wikipedia; or my contributions have to be permitted along with all the other un-cited content. This is basic egalitarianism I'm asking for.
Issues to be mediated
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
C.Fred and Closeapple removed my contributions because I did not cite anything. My argument is that the vast majority of the article lacks citations. If my contributions can be removed, then every un-cited sentence, to preserve fairness to me, has to be removed from the article and from Wikipedia; or my contributions have to be permitted along with all the other un-cited content. This is basic egalitarianism I'm asking for.
Additional issues (added by other parties)
Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is
accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or
rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Reject: Fails to satisfy
prerequisite for mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice." For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
13:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)reply
C.Fred and Closeapple removed my contributions because I did not cite anything. My argument is that the vast majority of the article lacks citations. If my contributions can be removed, then every un-cited sentence, to preserve fairness to me, has to be removed from the article and from Wikipedia; or my contributions have to be permitted along with all the other un-cited content. This is basic egalitarianism I'm asking for.
Issues to be mediated
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
Primary issues (added by the filing party)
C.Fred and Closeapple removed my contributions because I did not cite anything. My argument is that the vast majority of the article lacks citations. If my contributions can be removed, then every un-cited sentence, to preserve fairness to me, has to be removed from the article and from Wikipedia; or my contributions have to be permitted along with all the other un-cited content. This is basic egalitarianism I'm asking for.
Additional issues (added by other parties)
Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is
accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or
rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
Reject: Fails to satisfy
prerequisite for mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice." For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
13:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC) (Chairperson)reply