I just need someone to see if this is acceptable for publication. Thanks!
Sheelal ( talk) 02:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I created a userspace tonight. I don't even know if that is something I had to do, but I've gotten little help or feedback getting the desired page up and running. Because of this, I don't know what I'm doing right or wrong. To the best of my knowledge, the intended page is finished but likely needs only to be renamed (which I do not know how to do) complete with multiple references. A link to that article is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RachelRuth/new_article_name_here
The article name would be: Dana Evan Kaplan. I do not have "move" as an option so I am assuming I am doing something wrong or something more needs to be done but I do not know what. Am I supposed to create a subpage from my userpage and, in a sense, start the process over? Please help. Thank you.
RachelRuth ( talk) 07:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This if for Wikipelli (assuming I am submitting this correctly but any additional help would be appreciated. My article has been revised substantially now and I feel it is ready for publication. Could someone please review and let me know what finalizations if any need to be done to publish it or, if it is ready now, perhaps one of you publish it? Thank you for all your help, guys.
Thank you, MatthewVanitas and Wikipelli for your help and suggestions. I have revised my references section (I hope) accordingly. Do please let me know if this is all now correct and/or what further changes I may need to make.
I think I understand. What I need to do then is removed the links from the article that point to his works (currently in the References section). Since I do want those pieces listed somewhere, I should move those to a new section entitled Works but not link to them from the article itself. Would that be more appropriate?
Thank you again for your assistance and creating the Works section for me. When you said "chop them out as-is, remove the "ref" tags from around them, and put them in a list with each on its own line, starting with an asterisk (to bullet them)", you do mean to cut those parts from the article, make the changes you mentioned, and paste them into the Works section as you mentioned, correct? And, is this the correct way to sign? I've not done that before. My apologies. RachelRuth ( talk) 15:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the compliment and assistance. I moved most of the suggested material down to Works, but wasn't sure about what is now references 2,3, and 4. I was under the impression the Works section should or is supposed to be for works that are entirely his own. Refs 2-4, he only contributed to so I wasn't sure if those could or should remain as just references (i.e., acknowledgement of the fact that he contributed pieces to them) or may indeed need to be moved to Works. And definitely thanks again for moving that one to the Works section. That was an enormous help in showing me what/how it needed to be moved and look. If I'm not mistaken, now, aside from my question about refs 2-4. the article should be good to go and I can smile (finally).-- RachelRuth ( talk) 05:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for all your guidance and help. I believe I've got everything squared away now. I did as you mentioned and placed the works he'd been a contributor to as a sub-section of Works titled Co-author and removed the refs from the article. All of that went quite well. I did notice, though, while I did not set the word "Co-authored" to be bold, it appears to me to be so. Is this automatic or can it be undone or, really, does it even need to be?-- RachelRuth ( talk) 12:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello and thank you! I have made the suggestions and corrections you mentioned and moved it into, I suppose, publication. However, despite having added the article to the categories you mentions, I see this at the top of the article: This page is a new unreviewed article. This template should be removed once the page has been reviewed by someone other than its creator; if necessary the page should be appropriately tagged for cleanup. If you are the article's creator, you can seek feedback on your new article. (January 2011) Wiki letter w.svg This article has not been added to any categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles.
Here is the link to the "published" article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Evan_Kaplan
Thank you again for all your assistance thus far. -- RachelRuth ( talk) 04:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
This is my first company post on wikipedia so I am looking for feedback.
RyanAStoner ( talk) 07:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Trying to get this post checked and up. How do I add images?
Fedeforpieter (
talk)
07:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Can you please check this page to see whether it is good enough to publish?
Wareid21 (
talk)
08:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Could you please check to see if my article is correct and eligible to be posted?
Carashmara (
talk)
09:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Basic write up of a Melbourne upcoming musician.
Bestyeahbest ( talk) 10:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Is this article ok to include on Wikipedia in terms of style and sources? Thanks, Jenny
Jemimaaaa ( talk) 10:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Requesting feedback on my first wiki page, XTG underwear brand. Thanks.
BishopA4 ( talk) 11:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I would love to hear/read comments on this latest article I've written. I haven't created many articles and I am still learning and would like to create good articles. Thanks!
Wikipelli Talk 11:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
The template has been there for a long time now. Would somebody please check the page? Thank you!
RM Vollmer 11:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This WIKI entry is not meant to be comprehensive. It is a base for others hopefully to expand on. I believe the entry is a good starting point and substantiated by references.
Kentzo ( talk) 13:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This WIKI entry is a base for others hopefully to expand on. I believe the entry is a good starting point and substantiated by references.
Kentzo (
talk)
13:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This WIKI entry is not meant to be comprehensive. It is a base for others hopefully to expand on. I believe the entry is a good starting point and substantiated by references.
Kentzo (
talk)
13:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I received the warnings found on my article, and have hopefully addressed them. Do I remove the warnings myself? Does someone else? I'm new at this... Max
MaxSewell (
talk)
14:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm trying to give an overview of the main components of this Business Intelligence software.
I'm not sure if it's sufficient to expand the short description on the
Cognos#Products page or to create an own article for this software, since
Cognos was aquired by
IBM in 2007. So its a product sold by IBM, but it was first released by Cognos in 2005, has even kept the name of the developing company.
Infopedian ( talk) 15:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
New listeing for deceased visual artist, Jason Berger. Reliable resources are included and linked. what else must I do to legitimize this posting? KB
Berger Jason (
talk)
17:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Need help on organization , concise language, and perhaps some added content, mainly international information about the day. Would appreciate all input!
Lenses (
talk)
17:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Any suggestions/feedback on how to improve references, notability, etc. is greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Cchucks ( talk) 18:31, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Michaeltaft ( talk) 19:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Matthew. I'll get to work on the categories and WikiProjects. Michaeltaft ( talk) 19:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
A minimal version of both categories and WikiProjects in place. Michaeltaft ( talk) 20:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
There really not more references that I have used besides the website, what would you recommend? Also, is it acceptable for publication? thank you
Mlbpaa ( talk) 20:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
this broad topic is only briefly stubbed at Athletic sports; the Athletics (sport) page causes a lot of confusion because it is the main "athletics" page but the topic is extremely narrow. I will be developing the page more, and adding more references.
TommyKirchhoff ( talk) 20:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
After having the article rejected for not having reliable third-party sources, I added references from the Abbey Theatre, Dublin Theatre Online, and Entertainment.ie. I was wondering if those met the criteria? If not, what type of sources should I look for? (I'm assuming the de facto national awards for theatre in Ireland meets the notability guidelines).
I just need someone to see if this is acceptable for publication. Thanks!
Sheelal ( talk) 02:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I created a userspace tonight. I don't even know if that is something I had to do, but I've gotten little help or feedback getting the desired page up and running. Because of this, I don't know what I'm doing right or wrong. To the best of my knowledge, the intended page is finished but likely needs only to be renamed (which I do not know how to do) complete with multiple references. A link to that article is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RachelRuth/new_article_name_here
The article name would be: Dana Evan Kaplan. I do not have "move" as an option so I am assuming I am doing something wrong or something more needs to be done but I do not know what. Am I supposed to create a subpage from my userpage and, in a sense, start the process over? Please help. Thank you.
RachelRuth ( talk) 07:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This if for Wikipelli (assuming I am submitting this correctly but any additional help would be appreciated. My article has been revised substantially now and I feel it is ready for publication. Could someone please review and let me know what finalizations if any need to be done to publish it or, if it is ready now, perhaps one of you publish it? Thank you for all your help, guys.
Thank you, MatthewVanitas and Wikipelli for your help and suggestions. I have revised my references section (I hope) accordingly. Do please let me know if this is all now correct and/or what further changes I may need to make.
I think I understand. What I need to do then is removed the links from the article that point to his works (currently in the References section). Since I do want those pieces listed somewhere, I should move those to a new section entitled Works but not link to them from the article itself. Would that be more appropriate?
Thank you again for your assistance and creating the Works section for me. When you said "chop them out as-is, remove the "ref" tags from around them, and put them in a list with each on its own line, starting with an asterisk (to bullet them)", you do mean to cut those parts from the article, make the changes you mentioned, and paste them into the Works section as you mentioned, correct? And, is this the correct way to sign? I've not done that before. My apologies. RachelRuth ( talk) 15:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the compliment and assistance. I moved most of the suggested material down to Works, but wasn't sure about what is now references 2,3, and 4. I was under the impression the Works section should or is supposed to be for works that are entirely his own. Refs 2-4, he only contributed to so I wasn't sure if those could or should remain as just references (i.e., acknowledgement of the fact that he contributed pieces to them) or may indeed need to be moved to Works. And definitely thanks again for moving that one to the Works section. That was an enormous help in showing me what/how it needed to be moved and look. If I'm not mistaken, now, aside from my question about refs 2-4. the article should be good to go and I can smile (finally).-- RachelRuth ( talk) 05:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for all your guidance and help. I believe I've got everything squared away now. I did as you mentioned and placed the works he'd been a contributor to as a sub-section of Works titled Co-author and removed the refs from the article. All of that went quite well. I did notice, though, while I did not set the word "Co-authored" to be bold, it appears to me to be so. Is this automatic or can it be undone or, really, does it even need to be?-- RachelRuth ( talk) 12:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello and thank you! I have made the suggestions and corrections you mentioned and moved it into, I suppose, publication. However, despite having added the article to the categories you mentions, I see this at the top of the article: This page is a new unreviewed article. This template should be removed once the page has been reviewed by someone other than its creator; if necessary the page should be appropriately tagged for cleanup. If you are the article's creator, you can seek feedback on your new article. (January 2011) Wiki letter w.svg This article has not been added to any categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles.
Here is the link to the "published" article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Evan_Kaplan
Thank you again for all your assistance thus far. -- RachelRuth ( talk) 04:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
This is my first company post on wikipedia so I am looking for feedback.
RyanAStoner ( talk) 07:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Trying to get this post checked and up. How do I add images?
Fedeforpieter (
talk)
07:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Can you please check this page to see whether it is good enough to publish?
Wareid21 (
talk)
08:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Could you please check to see if my article is correct and eligible to be posted?
Carashmara (
talk)
09:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Basic write up of a Melbourne upcoming musician.
Bestyeahbest ( talk) 10:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Is this article ok to include on Wikipedia in terms of style and sources? Thanks, Jenny
Jemimaaaa ( talk) 10:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Requesting feedback on my first wiki page, XTG underwear brand. Thanks.
BishopA4 ( talk) 11:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I would love to hear/read comments on this latest article I've written. I haven't created many articles and I am still learning and would like to create good articles. Thanks!
Wikipelli Talk 11:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
The template has been there for a long time now. Would somebody please check the page? Thank you!
RM Vollmer 11:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This WIKI entry is not meant to be comprehensive. It is a base for others hopefully to expand on. I believe the entry is a good starting point and substantiated by references.
Kentzo ( talk) 13:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This WIKI entry is a base for others hopefully to expand on. I believe the entry is a good starting point and substantiated by references.
Kentzo (
talk)
13:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
This WIKI entry is not meant to be comprehensive. It is a base for others hopefully to expand on. I believe the entry is a good starting point and substantiated by references.
Kentzo (
talk)
13:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I received the warnings found on my article, and have hopefully addressed them. Do I remove the warnings myself? Does someone else? I'm new at this... Max
MaxSewell (
talk)
14:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm trying to give an overview of the main components of this Business Intelligence software.
I'm not sure if it's sufficient to expand the short description on the
Cognos#Products page or to create an own article for this software, since
Cognos was aquired by
IBM in 2007. So its a product sold by IBM, but it was first released by Cognos in 2005, has even kept the name of the developing company.
Infopedian ( talk) 15:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
New listeing for deceased visual artist, Jason Berger. Reliable resources are included and linked. what else must I do to legitimize this posting? KB
Berger Jason (
talk)
17:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Need help on organization , concise language, and perhaps some added content, mainly international information about the day. Would appreciate all input!
Lenses (
talk)
17:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Any suggestions/feedback on how to improve references, notability, etc. is greatly appreciated! Thank you!
Cchucks ( talk) 18:31, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Michaeltaft ( talk) 19:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Matthew. I'll get to work on the categories and WikiProjects. Michaeltaft ( talk) 19:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
A minimal version of both categories and WikiProjects in place. Michaeltaft ( talk) 20:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
There really not more references that I have used besides the website, what would you recommend? Also, is it acceptable for publication? thank you
Mlbpaa ( talk) 20:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
this broad topic is only briefly stubbed at Athletic sports; the Athletics (sport) page causes a lot of confusion because it is the main "athletics" page but the topic is extremely narrow. I will be developing the page more, and adding more references.
TommyKirchhoff ( talk) 20:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
After having the article rejected for not having reliable third-party sources, I added references from the Abbey Theatre, Dublin Theatre Online, and Entertainment.ie. I was wondering if those met the criteria? If not, what type of sources should I look for? (I'm assuming the de facto national awards for theatre in Ireland meets the notability guidelines).