This style page is considered a stub, correct?
ELSOSA ( talk) 02:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I created this article after it was on the "on this day..." for January 11, but the report itself didn't have a page. It's my first, and it's something that I care about, as it's the reason that all four of my grandparents quit smoking, and it probably saved some of their lives. Nevertheless, I'm trying to be neutral and I think I've done a good job. What I would like review and advice on is the following:
General:
1)Basic review, see how the article is doing, what to improve, etc. etc. The new unreviewed article tag is starting to irritate me as it's almost been a year. Is the expansion tag still necessary? Any other ideas or concerns I can't see because of my involvement would be appreciated.
2)Ideas for what else could be put in. I'm not asking for you to do all the work unless you want to, but I would like some ideas on where to go with it. It still seems like many sections could be expanded, but I have no idea what else I can add, and hopefully a new mind can see other things that I've missed. Which brings me to-
3)How do I spread the word about it? I'm not exactly new to wikipedia, but I'm not very active and I'm still learning how the community works. Where can I go to hopefully get more editors interested in it so it isn't just me? I feel like I'm running the page, and I'd rather avoid any ownership issues.
Specific:
1)The name is accurate, but unwieldy. What redirects would be appropriate, i.e. Smoking and Health (with a did you mean health effects of smoking?) or surgeon general's report on smoking? I can think of many permutations, which would be effective at satisfying WP:REDIRECT?
2)Two of the big content contributions from others are in the findings section regarding the report saying smoking isn't an addiction. The first was essentially saying that this was an error later corrected, the second basically overwriting the first and saying smoking is not an addiction. While I personally believe smoking is an addiction, I'm by no means an expert so I did my best to bring it to a middle ground. Did I handle it well, or poorly? Does it seem neutral? Is there research which states that tobacco smoking does or does not satisfy the medical definition of an addiction, instead of making me put two and two together, which would be original research? I've looked and haven't found anything.
Thanks,
Somedaypilot ( talk) 05:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please review my article about Ricardo Macedo, who is one of the leading Personal Trainers in London, the UK, the article provides a quick background check on Ricardo Macedo and details regarding Ricardo's credentials and contributions.
Seoworkz (
talk)
08:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
MayFlowerCornelia ( talk) 09:36, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I've tried to write article about Sugarscape simulation. It's my first piece of work here. Could anybody please give me some feedback ? :) Letajici cihla ( talk) 16:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I would like to have this article uploaded as soon as possible. It describes the history and work of an animation company in LA.
Is this article acceptable for Wikipedia? If yes, then please, upload it as soon as possible. If no, then what do I need to improve?
AurynInc ( talk) 18:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please review so it can become part of Wikipedia!
Hilaryb90 ( talk) 18:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
This section is a machine-translation of parts of http://www.elbaloncuscatleco.com/historia.html. I was told by Fae that "translations can be a good basis to draft an article (in your userspace) and ask for comment using WP:RFF."
Jaime 070996 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
This style page is considered a stub, correct?
ELSOSA ( talk) 02:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I created this article after it was on the "on this day..." for January 11, but the report itself didn't have a page. It's my first, and it's something that I care about, as it's the reason that all four of my grandparents quit smoking, and it probably saved some of their lives. Nevertheless, I'm trying to be neutral and I think I've done a good job. What I would like review and advice on is the following:
General:
1)Basic review, see how the article is doing, what to improve, etc. etc. The new unreviewed article tag is starting to irritate me as it's almost been a year. Is the expansion tag still necessary? Any other ideas or concerns I can't see because of my involvement would be appreciated.
2)Ideas for what else could be put in. I'm not asking for you to do all the work unless you want to, but I would like some ideas on where to go with it. It still seems like many sections could be expanded, but I have no idea what else I can add, and hopefully a new mind can see other things that I've missed. Which brings me to-
3)How do I spread the word about it? I'm not exactly new to wikipedia, but I'm not very active and I'm still learning how the community works. Where can I go to hopefully get more editors interested in it so it isn't just me? I feel like I'm running the page, and I'd rather avoid any ownership issues.
Specific:
1)The name is accurate, but unwieldy. What redirects would be appropriate, i.e. Smoking and Health (with a did you mean health effects of smoking?) or surgeon general's report on smoking? I can think of many permutations, which would be effective at satisfying WP:REDIRECT?
2)Two of the big content contributions from others are in the findings section regarding the report saying smoking isn't an addiction. The first was essentially saying that this was an error later corrected, the second basically overwriting the first and saying smoking is not an addiction. While I personally believe smoking is an addiction, I'm by no means an expert so I did my best to bring it to a middle ground. Did I handle it well, or poorly? Does it seem neutral? Is there research which states that tobacco smoking does or does not satisfy the medical definition of an addiction, instead of making me put two and two together, which would be original research? I've looked and haven't found anything.
Thanks,
Somedaypilot ( talk) 05:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please review my article about Ricardo Macedo, who is one of the leading Personal Trainers in London, the UK, the article provides a quick background check on Ricardo Macedo and details regarding Ricardo's credentials and contributions.
Seoworkz (
talk)
08:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
MayFlowerCornelia ( talk) 09:36, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I've tried to write article about Sugarscape simulation. It's my first piece of work here. Could anybody please give me some feedback ? :) Letajici cihla ( talk) 16:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I would like to have this article uploaded as soon as possible. It describes the history and work of an animation company in LA.
Is this article acceptable for Wikipedia? If yes, then please, upload it as soon as possible. If no, then what do I need to improve?
AurynInc ( talk) 18:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Please review so it can become part of Wikipedia!
Hilaryb90 ( talk) 18:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
This section is a machine-translation of parts of http://www.elbaloncuscatleco.com/historia.html. I was told by Fae that "translations can be a good basis to draft an article (in your userspace) and ask for comment using WP:RFF."
Jaime 070996 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)