This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct.
WHEELER has made a personal attack of an anti-Semitic nature and other attacks. He wrote in Talk:Early_National_Socialism/draft:
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~): I did not make any anti-semetic comments. Andy is free to attack the Catholic Church all he wants to. I just come back that it was Jewish Bolsheviks of Russia that destroyed the Orthodox Church in Russia. This is the truth. He doesn't like the truth and so labels me anti-semetic. Anytime any criticism is laid against the Jews, they are labelled AntiSemetic. It's an ad-hominem attack. Andy is busy making the Catholic Church responsible for all of Nazism but then refuse to see their complicity in the Russian Revolution. Just because I point that out, doesn't make me an anti-semite. WHEELER 14:39, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Andy deleted my original material, incorporate it into the Nazism article. Then he takes the material and forms a new article from it without referencing me, talking to me. YOU did nothing like this. You stole material. You vote to delte the material and take 3'4 of it and make an article with it. This is why I am mad. You do things, and then you act all innocent like I am the instigator of this. I do not believe that you vote the material down, take it then and place it elsewhere. My dander is up. You never talked, you just revert and make me do all the talking. You never talk first, you delete and then make me do all the talking.WHEELER 16:49, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Andy stole material deletes my post, and you people do nothing. And now I am getting ganged up on. Andy is constantly reverting stuff that I have quotes on. And just because I point out his hypocrisy. This happened in Berea College, This goes on everywhere I go. My words will get me in trouble but Andy's Actions will not. I am only pointing out his inconsistencies and his attitude toward quotes. He does not want to acknowledge the "Socialism" in Nazism or Fascism articles. he deletes my quotes constantly. This is not right. He is not being intellectually honest and all I am doing is lampooning his dishonesty in his incapability and his refusal to acknowledge facts. What he is doing is censoring. WHEELER 16:54, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Lampooning is not a personal attack. Michael Moore does it all the time. And the above quote is NOT anti-semetic. I may have been overboard in the word Jewish Bolshevism but the majority of the leadership cadre of the Bolshevist party including Trotsky was Jewish. That is the truth. The Orthodox Church was destroyed during the Russian Revolution. 200,000 Orthodox priests were outright murdered by that regime. you don't see any memorials in this country about that incident either. WHEELER 17:03, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
My authors are constantly called "rightwing"cranks. Cranks is the word they used. That is a slur. but will that be punished noooooo just Wheeler. WHEELER 17:05, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
You have my support, WHEELER! These people are Nazis! Is Andy a Jew? He's an asshole, at any rate! He pulled similar crap with me. He's got a bunch of gay friends running around this site who consider ANY disagreement with them to be "homophobic" in nature; obviously Andy himself is the Jew equivalent! Minorities who think their minority status makes them better than non-minorities SHOULD HAVE BEEN wiped out by Hitler, if you ask me! 152.163.253.8 07:46, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
"Andy deleted my original material, incorporate it into the Nazism article. Then he takes the material and forms a new article from it without referencing me, talking to me. YOU did nothing like this. You stole material. You vote to delte the material and take 3'4 of it and make an article with it. This is why I am mad. You do things, and then you act all innocent like I am the instigator of this. I do not believe that you vote the material down, take it then and place it elsewhere. My dander is up. You never talked, you just revert and make me do all the talking. You never talk first, you delete and then make me do all the talking.WHEELER 16:49, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)"
THIS paragraph deserves special attention, WHEELER, because abusive, power-mad sociopaths, who are also out to get me because I asked one of them an honest, innocent question and he somehow managed to take it as a "personal attack", DO use the most shady and manipulative of tactics to make THEMSELVES looks innocent; meanwhile, it is THEY who instigated the entire problem. I know EXACTLY what you're going through. And, you are definitely correct, if you try to rebut their claims, they revert your edits, OR they consider your defending yourself "vandalism" and then use it to-piggy-back onto their original, falsified claims of "vandalism"--thus, making you look like the bad guy anyway because people here are too STUNOD to read what you've actually WRITTEN, instead just focussing on the fact that you're "not in a position" to refute the more "powerful" administrator's FRAUDULENT claims.
Fortunately for me, I am a very powerful and successful lawyer offline. I know my rights. I've begun the formal, legal charging of these people (who've tried numerous times to strip me of my Constitutional rights) in both my county and state courthouses. (If you need defending or would like to file legal complaints, I'd be more than willing to assist you.)
But, yes, I know exactly what you're going through. Any questions that they cannot answer, they delete. This is why I felt forced to go above this silly project's "administrators'" heads (WAY above them), and had to file legal charges against them. It seems to be the only way that some of these people will finally admit their wrongs. They can't censor an American court proceeding very well, can they? It's a shame that these wackjobs brought things so far--this used to be a very enjoyable passtime for me. 172.152.114.121 17:52, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.
This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct.
WHEELER has made a personal attack of an anti-Semitic nature and other attacks. He wrote in Talk:Early_National_Socialism/draft:
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~): I did not make any anti-semetic comments. Andy is free to attack the Catholic Church all he wants to. I just come back that it was Jewish Bolsheviks of Russia that destroyed the Orthodox Church in Russia. This is the truth. He doesn't like the truth and so labels me anti-semetic. Anytime any criticism is laid against the Jews, they are labelled AntiSemetic. It's an ad-hominem attack. Andy is busy making the Catholic Church responsible for all of Nazism but then refuse to see their complicity in the Russian Revolution. Just because I point that out, doesn't make me an anti-semite. WHEELER 14:39, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Andy deleted my original material, incorporate it into the Nazism article. Then he takes the material and forms a new article from it without referencing me, talking to me. YOU did nothing like this. You stole material. You vote to delte the material and take 3'4 of it and make an article with it. This is why I am mad. You do things, and then you act all innocent like I am the instigator of this. I do not believe that you vote the material down, take it then and place it elsewhere. My dander is up. You never talked, you just revert and make me do all the talking. You never talk first, you delete and then make me do all the talking.WHEELER 16:49, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Andy stole material deletes my post, and you people do nothing. And now I am getting ganged up on. Andy is constantly reverting stuff that I have quotes on. And just because I point out his hypocrisy. This happened in Berea College, This goes on everywhere I go. My words will get me in trouble but Andy's Actions will not. I am only pointing out his inconsistencies and his attitude toward quotes. He does not want to acknowledge the "Socialism" in Nazism or Fascism articles. he deletes my quotes constantly. This is not right. He is not being intellectually honest and all I am doing is lampooning his dishonesty in his incapability and his refusal to acknowledge facts. What he is doing is censoring. WHEELER 16:54, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Lampooning is not a personal attack. Michael Moore does it all the time. And the above quote is NOT anti-semetic. I may have been overboard in the word Jewish Bolshevism but the majority of the leadership cadre of the Bolshevist party including Trotsky was Jewish. That is the truth. The Orthodox Church was destroyed during the Russian Revolution. 200,000 Orthodox priests were outright murdered by that regime. you don't see any memorials in this country about that incident either. WHEELER 17:03, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
My authors are constantly called "rightwing"cranks. Cranks is the word they used. That is a slur. but will that be punished noooooo just Wheeler. WHEELER 17:05, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
You have my support, WHEELER! These people are Nazis! Is Andy a Jew? He's an asshole, at any rate! He pulled similar crap with me. He's got a bunch of gay friends running around this site who consider ANY disagreement with them to be "homophobic" in nature; obviously Andy himself is the Jew equivalent! Minorities who think their minority status makes them better than non-minorities SHOULD HAVE BEEN wiped out by Hitler, if you ask me! 152.163.253.8 07:46, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
"Andy deleted my original material, incorporate it into the Nazism article. Then he takes the material and forms a new article from it without referencing me, talking to me. YOU did nothing like this. You stole material. You vote to delte the material and take 3'4 of it and make an article with it. This is why I am mad. You do things, and then you act all innocent like I am the instigator of this. I do not believe that you vote the material down, take it then and place it elsewhere. My dander is up. You never talked, you just revert and make me do all the talking. You never talk first, you delete and then make me do all the talking.WHEELER 16:49, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)"
THIS paragraph deserves special attention, WHEELER, because abusive, power-mad sociopaths, who are also out to get me because I asked one of them an honest, innocent question and he somehow managed to take it as a "personal attack", DO use the most shady and manipulative of tactics to make THEMSELVES looks innocent; meanwhile, it is THEY who instigated the entire problem. I know EXACTLY what you're going through. And, you are definitely correct, if you try to rebut their claims, they revert your edits, OR they consider your defending yourself "vandalism" and then use it to-piggy-back onto their original, falsified claims of "vandalism"--thus, making you look like the bad guy anyway because people here are too STUNOD to read what you've actually WRITTEN, instead just focussing on the fact that you're "not in a position" to refute the more "powerful" administrator's FRAUDULENT claims.
Fortunately for me, I am a very powerful and successful lawyer offline. I know my rights. I've begun the formal, legal charging of these people (who've tried numerous times to strip me of my Constitutional rights) in both my county and state courthouses. (If you need defending or would like to file legal complaints, I'd be more than willing to assist you.)
But, yes, I know exactly what you're going through. Any questions that they cannot answer, they delete. This is why I felt forced to go above this silly project's "administrators'" heads (WAY above them), and had to file legal charges against them. It seems to be the only way that some of these people will finally admit their wrongs. They can't censor an American court proceeding very well, can they? It's a shame that these wackjobs brought things so far--this used to be a very enjoyable passtime for me. 172.152.114.121 17:52, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.