request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC) |
I'm only recently involved with the banned user I thought was Societyfinalclubs but I guess is actually Mctrain. In any case, the editor has been indefinitely blocked but continues to evade the block from dynamic IPs, some of which I listed above. Upjoy, a newly created account, has jumped into the fray, editing in an identical fashion and with an identical point of view. Someone more involved in the history of the blocked editor would be better versed in his actions but I think checking the previous checkusers should be enough. Please check for any potential sleeper accounts, too. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony 22:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
One IP range softblocked for one week and another hardblocked for 3 months. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 03:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
Sam Korn rangeblocked two IP ranges for 6 months due to the disruption listed in Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Societyfinalclubs#Societyfinalclubs. That rangeblock was in May 2008. Starting in November (non-coincidentally 6 months later), User:Edward321 has noticed new editors editing the same articles that this serial hoaxer and vandal used to frequent, adding (among other things) unsourced info about the Barbaro family. Could a Checkuser re-check the ranges Sam blocked last May, verify it’s the same person, and re-do the rangeblock? My understanding is that there was little to no collateral damage. See User:Barneca/watch/societyfinalclubs for a little more info.-- barneca ( talk) 03:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Likely Technical and behavioral evidence indicates that it is likely that the following accounts are related:
However, this range is
Unrelated to the ranges blocked below by Sam, and a full rangeblock would inconvenience existing users. --
Avi (
talk) 05:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 18:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
Frienlifer and Schooldoc appear to be single-purpose sock puppets. Justinm1978 ( talk) 18:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Concerns These accounts were created using shared IPs from a public libray system. Mctrain is one account that has been lumped into this category of problematic users by mistake. I have notified all public users to start accounts on their own PCs. Please keep all suspect accounts closed, including Mctrain. Mctrain will open a new account on his own PC. Thank you very much Geniejargon ( talk) 19:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Moving this back into "outstanding requests," as another probable Mctrain sock has popped up, blanking information on talk pages:
— Deor ( talk) 12:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Sam, you may be creating much collateral damage here. Blocks of ranged Ip's can just indicate a particular internet provider, particular corporation, library stytem as well as a geographical region within the U.S. Many of these accounts here have no record of even editing collegiate subject matter. It is also bad policy to just blindly accuse an account because of a range of Ip's in question, half of the time also blocking their own talk pages-I have to disagree with what I see here. Be very careful with your blocking practices. Don't go off on a power trip. 207.63.134.98 ( talk) 17:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC) |
I'm only recently involved with the banned user I thought was Societyfinalclubs but I guess is actually Mctrain. In any case, the editor has been indefinitely blocked but continues to evade the block from dynamic IPs, some of which I listed above. Upjoy, a newly created account, has jumped into the fray, editing in an identical fashion and with an identical point of view. Someone more involved in the history of the blocked editor would be better versed in his actions but I think checking the previous checkusers should be enough. Please check for any potential sleeper accounts, too. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony 22:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
One IP range softblocked for one week and another hardblocked for 3 months. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 03:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
Sam Korn rangeblocked two IP ranges for 6 months due to the disruption listed in Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Societyfinalclubs#Societyfinalclubs. That rangeblock was in May 2008. Starting in November (non-coincidentally 6 months later), User:Edward321 has noticed new editors editing the same articles that this serial hoaxer and vandal used to frequent, adding (among other things) unsourced info about the Barbaro family. Could a Checkuser re-check the ranges Sam blocked last May, verify it’s the same person, and re-do the rangeblock? My understanding is that there was little to no collateral damage. See User:Barneca/watch/societyfinalclubs for a little more info.-- barneca ( talk) 03:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Likely Technical and behavioral evidence indicates that it is likely that the following accounts are related:
However, this range is
Unrelated to the ranges blocked below by Sam, and a full rangeblock would inconvenience existing users. --
Avi (
talk) 05:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 18:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
Frienlifer and Schooldoc appear to be single-purpose sock puppets. Justinm1978 ( talk) 18:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Concerns These accounts were created using shared IPs from a public libray system. Mctrain is one account that has been lumped into this category of problematic users by mistake. I have notified all public users to start accounts on their own PCs. Please keep all suspect accounts closed, including Mctrain. Mctrain will open a new account on his own PC. Thank you very much Geniejargon ( talk) 19:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Moving this back into "outstanding requests," as another probable Mctrain sock has popped up, blanking information on talk pages:
— Deor ( talk) 12:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Sam, you may be creating much collateral damage here. Blocks of ranged Ip's can just indicate a particular internet provider, particular corporation, library stytem as well as a geographical region within the U.S. Many of these accounts here have no record of even editing collegiate subject matter. It is also bad policy to just blindly accuse an account because of a range of Ip's in question, half of the time also blocking their own talk pages-I have to disagree with what I see here. Be very careful with your blocking practices. Don't go off on a power trip. 207.63.134.98 ( talk) 17:10, 16 May 2008 (UTC)