This may be a new sock puppet of Snle or it may not. From the contributions, it appears that he/she is trying to appeal the case to the administrators notice board and Jimbo Wales as well!-- Niohe 19:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
How can you be so stupid. The second one is done by yourself. User68732 20:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
No further comment necessary. See below for full case.-- Niohe 17:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I appears that Snle is violating the permanent block with a new User ID.
I also want to check the following users, who are suspected previous sock puppets of Snle. If they are indeed identical with Snle, they show a pattern of abusive and disruptive behavior on Wikipedia. Please note the only edit by Manchus as an example of this.
Since Snle is clearly not abiding by the bans, I will request that Manchuria and Talk:Manchuria be semi-protected. That is probably the best course of action for the time being.-- Niohe 18:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I would like to have User:Disambiguation checked against Pezh and Snle. His edit patterns are similar to Snle's sock puppets and he made a completely unwarranted disambiguation without much prior discussion, which earned him a temporary block. If you look at Talk:Manchuria it seems that this user has been making edits both to the main page and the talk page under different user accounts.-- Niohe 15:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
This is so ridiculous. How can someone have so many infinitely blocked sock puppet? And there are new socks coming? Disambiguation 16:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note:: Were the other two users listed therefore declined, confirmed as well, or unrelated etc.? Daniel . Bryant 04:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
See below for more information.-- Niohe 03:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems that the blocked User:Snle has opened a new account. Please see discussion below for more details.-- Niohe 21:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note: I have indefinitely blocked Wang Bin ( talk · contribs) as Snle's sockpuppet as it seemed rather obvious in [1] and [2]. If checkuser provides a contrasting result, please unblock ASAP. Thanks -- Srik e it ( Talk | Email) 04:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems that Snle has kept a different account active, which he/she is now using to reinsert by the User:13569 edits, which Khoikhoi deleted yesterday. Judging by the contributions, User:Manzhouri is nothing but a sock-puppet of Snle.-- Niohe 18:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note: Please provide
diffs and the code letter from the list at the top of the base page so that the checkuser that looks at your request may fully understand the nature of it. Thank you.
Kevin_b_er 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed Dmcdevit· t 22:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
After Snle's sockpuppetry (below) was proven, he was was indefinately blocked. His (rather obvious) sockpuppet has returned to continue the discussion on all three articles he edited: Harbin, Dalian, and Shenyang. The user exhibits a virtually identical pattern of behavior to that of Snle's previous sockpuppets, and I have no doubts that he is evading his ban. — Khoi khoi 00:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed Also likely, 56352 ( talk · contribs). Dmcdevit· t 02:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Revert of recovered common names of cities, e.g., in Dalian article:
Two relatively new accounts engaged in revert war deleting historical names from Dalian, Harbin and Shenyang. Both of them have similar pattern, including misleading edit summaries. `' mikka (t) 17:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed Zhang Qiang and Snle in which light the remaining ones may be obvious. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I blocked them all indef Jaranda wat's sup 22:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
This may be a new sock puppet of Snle or it may not. From the contributions, it appears that he/she is trying to appeal the case to the administrators notice board and Jimbo Wales as well!-- Niohe 19:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
How can you be so stupid. The second one is done by yourself. User68732 20:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
No further comment necessary. See below for full case.-- Niohe 17:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I appears that Snle is violating the permanent block with a new User ID.
I also want to check the following users, who are suspected previous sock puppets of Snle. If they are indeed identical with Snle, they show a pattern of abusive and disruptive behavior on Wikipedia. Please note the only edit by Manchus as an example of this.
Since Snle is clearly not abiding by the bans, I will request that Manchuria and Talk:Manchuria be semi-protected. That is probably the best course of action for the time being.-- Niohe 18:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
I would like to have User:Disambiguation checked against Pezh and Snle. His edit patterns are similar to Snle's sock puppets and he made a completely unwarranted disambiguation without much prior discussion, which earned him a temporary block. If you look at Talk:Manchuria it seems that this user has been making edits both to the main page and the talk page under different user accounts.-- Niohe 15:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
This is so ridiculous. How can someone have so many infinitely blocked sock puppet? And there are new socks coming? Disambiguation 16:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note:: Were the other two users listed therefore declined, confirmed as well, or unrelated etc.? Daniel . Bryant 04:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
See below for more information.-- Niohe 03:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems that the blocked User:Snle has opened a new account. Please see discussion below for more details.-- Niohe 21:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note: I have indefinitely blocked Wang Bin ( talk · contribs) as Snle's sockpuppet as it seemed rather obvious in [1] and [2]. If checkuser provides a contrasting result, please unblock ASAP. Thanks -- Srik e it ( Talk | Email) 04:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems that Snle has kept a different account active, which he/she is now using to reinsert by the User:13569 edits, which Khoikhoi deleted yesterday. Judging by the contributions, User:Manzhouri is nothing but a sock-puppet of Snle.-- Niohe 18:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note: Please provide
diffs and the code letter from the list at the top of the base page so that the checkuser that looks at your request may fully understand the nature of it. Thank you.
Kevin_b_er 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed Dmcdevit· t 22:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
After Snle's sockpuppetry (below) was proven, he was was indefinately blocked. His (rather obvious) sockpuppet has returned to continue the discussion on all three articles he edited: Harbin, Dalian, and Shenyang. The user exhibits a virtually identical pattern of behavior to that of Snle's previous sockpuppets, and I have no doubts that he is evading his ban. — Khoi khoi 00:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed Also likely, 56352 ( talk · contribs). Dmcdevit· t 02:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Revert of recovered common names of cities, e.g., in Dalian article:
Two relatively new accounts engaged in revert war deleting historical names from Dalian, Harbin and Shenyang. Both of them have similar pattern, including misleading edit summaries. `' mikka (t) 17:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed Zhang Qiang and Snle in which light the remaining ones may be obvious. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
I blocked them all indef Jaranda wat's sup 22:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)