For continued checkuser discussion of this case, see Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard/Archive8#Universities.
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 01:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC) |
He deleted the main page. What is there more to say? This is like wonderfool and robdurbar's actions on wiktionary and here. Wikipedia: Requests for checkuser/Case/Robdurbar ~ Crazy tales 01:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated, already checked; please see my statement on ANI.
Dmcdevit·
t 04:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Evidence
Robdurbar's rampage reminds me of similar rampages by Wonderfool. I know that the other accounts listed have no current activity to check, but I am willing to bet that someone has kept some old CheckUser logs from either Wiktionary or Wikipedia on these vandal accounts. If someone confims the sockpuppetry with some old logs from either project, it will strenghten the evidence and the scope for a community ban I am considering.
The evidence on Dangherous's log starts at 6 August 2006.
The evidence on Wonderfool's log starts at 16 September 2005.
Jesse Viviano 14:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at Wiktionary's block log and a deleted version of his userpage for more evidence based on location of the vandal. Jesse Viviano 14:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note:: You only gave block logs (they are block logs showing every block the blocking administrator ever made), not diffs. This is not compliant with Code letter C. If this problem is not resolved in 3-7 days this case will be delisted.
Fun
pika 20:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Didn't we already run a checkuser that found nothing suspicious? Is it so unreasonable to think that two different people in the world would abuse the wiki in the same general manner? Grand master ka 01:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed, and I found another sockpuppet
User 56 (
talk ·
contribs).
Dmcdevit·
t 07:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
That is the most bizarre thing ever. Community ban discussion started... Sorry if you wanted to start the fun. I also blocked User:User 56. Grand master ka 08:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
There is apparently no user called Wonderfool; presumably the account was renamed. That one, then, was impossible to block. I've un- and re-blocked User:Robdurbar linking to this case. (Note that it instantly triggered an autoblock; I don't know yet if it's the user in question or collateral damage). -- kingboyk 16:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 10:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC) |
User:Robdurbar's (admin bit enabled) account was either compromised, or he went batshit insane, leading to vandalism of the main page, and the (since reverted) blocking of several users, including Jimbo. A steward finally intervened, stopping the madness. It'd be nice to know whether the account was compromised or some form of (hopefully temporary) insanity struck what appears to have been a previously good user. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 10:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I see nothing obvious to suggest that the account was compromised. Mackensen (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
For continued checkuser discussion of this case, see Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard/Archive8#Universities.
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 01:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC) |
He deleted the main page. What is there more to say? This is like wonderfool and robdurbar's actions on wiktionary and here. Wikipedia: Requests for checkuser/Case/Robdurbar ~ Crazy tales 01:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated, already checked; please see my statement on ANI.
Dmcdevit·
t 04:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Evidence
Robdurbar's rampage reminds me of similar rampages by Wonderfool. I know that the other accounts listed have no current activity to check, but I am willing to bet that someone has kept some old CheckUser logs from either Wiktionary or Wikipedia on these vandal accounts. If someone confims the sockpuppetry with some old logs from either project, it will strenghten the evidence and the scope for a community ban I am considering.
The evidence on Dangherous's log starts at 6 August 2006.
The evidence on Wonderfool's log starts at 16 September 2005.
Jesse Viviano 14:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at Wiktionary's block log and a deleted version of his userpage for more evidence based on location of the vandal. Jesse Viviano 14:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note:: You only gave block logs (they are block logs showing every block the blocking administrator ever made), not diffs. This is not compliant with Code letter C. If this problem is not resolved in 3-7 days this case will be delisted.
Fun
pika 20:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Didn't we already run a checkuser that found nothing suspicious? Is it so unreasonable to think that two different people in the world would abuse the wiki in the same general manner? Grand master ka 01:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed, and I found another sockpuppet
User 56 (
talk ·
contribs).
Dmcdevit·
t 07:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
That is the most bizarre thing ever. Community ban discussion started... Sorry if you wanted to start the fun. I also blocked User:User 56. Grand master ka 08:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
There is apparently no user called Wonderfool; presumably the account was renamed. That one, then, was impossible to block. I've un- and re-blocked User:Robdurbar linking to this case. (Note that it instantly triggered an autoblock; I don't know yet if it's the user in question or collateral damage). -- kingboyk 16:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 10:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC) |
User:Robdurbar's (admin bit enabled) account was either compromised, or he went batshit insane, leading to vandalism of the main page, and the (since reverted) blocking of several users, including Jimbo. A steward finally intervened, stopping the madness. It'd be nice to know whether the account was compromised or some form of (hopefully temporary) insanity struck what appears to have been a previously good user. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 10:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I see nothing obvious to suggest that the account was compromised. Mackensen (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)