• Richard Rolles ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Wutudidthere...isawit ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Edits by new user on same topic towards same POV, removing cites from sentences and jeopardizing quality status on a WP:GA article. [1], [2], [3], [4]. Richard Rolles ( talk · contribs) previously confirmed as disruptive sockpuppeteer, see other cases, below. Cirt ( talk) 20:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Working on this, consulting with other CUs. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC) reply

 Unrelated The two listed editors are unrelated. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Richard Rolles ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• The Legendary Shadow! ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Similar username to ShadowVsScientology ( talk · contribs), also [5] interest in same exact area. Evading a block. Cirt ( talk) 16:43, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Exactly the same style including the bolding and the preoccupation with me personally. If CU does not support then I can make the case otherwise. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 22:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC) reply

 Confirmed - very! Last time, I blocked the underlying IP for a while, which held them off a while. This time, I'm extending significantly - Alison ^❤ 06:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: The Legendary Shadow! ( talk · contribs) blocked and tagged. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 16:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Richard Rolles ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ShadowVsScientology ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Displays identical interest in Talk:List of new religious movements, harassing me ( here), and has a similar style. There is also very telling off-wiki evidence, please email me if you require details. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 17:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply
  • I fail to see the harassment in that diff--more like a profound lack of clue in the conjecture of collusion between Cirt and Justallofthem. No comment on putative off-wiki evidence. Durova ^Charge! 18:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Oh please Durova, I am being accused of being an "OSAbot" - a paid propagandist. I seem to remember you objecting rather strongly when I termed Cirt such. I really wish that you would not let your apparent desire to cover Cirt get the better of you. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 18:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply
    • Please note the use of the term "OSAbot" as further evidence of the sock - compare this edit. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 18:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply
      • Oh, I didn't understand what that meant. Yes, that makes sense now. Looks like the new account has been indeffed anyway over the username issue. Durova ^Charge! 18:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply
        • No prop. I would still like the checkuser completed as it reflects on the sockmaster account. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 18:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply

 Confirmed. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 23:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)  Clerk note: confirmed. blocked. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC) reply

• Richard Rolles ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Ken Moxon ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: Moxon is clearly from enturbulation.org as was indef-blocked Rolles and displays identical interest in Talk:List of new religious movements, harassing me (please see his accusations on the article talk page), and has a similar style. Rolles previously announced his intention to violate his block, please see this. Note also the username is taken from the enturb.org "enemy", Kendrick Moxon. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 04:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC) reply

 Confirmed - both of them are the same editor, yes. I've also blocked an underlying IP which was used to post comments attacking User:Justallofthem - Alison ^❤ 04:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks. -- Justallofthem ( talk) 05:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC) reply