For sockpuppet investigations after January, 2009, see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ResearchEditor/Archive
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 18:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: note |
That seems to be the lot. Possible ResearchEditor sockpuppets. All added the exact same information and citations to multiple pages using a series of throwaway accounts. The POV and sources suggest RE, promoting the discredited idea that there's any weight to the satanic ritual abuse moral panic, the use of the extreme abuse surveys (G4 speedied as a recreation of the Extreme Abuse Survey with an AFD here) and Randy Noblitt's discredited beliefs about satanic ritual abuse. All are single-purpose accounts that have only one topic's worth of edits, and redlinked talk and user pages. If it's not RE, then I would be very surprised, and even if not I can't concieve that it's not someone else sockpuppeting. If not RFCU-ed, accounts should probably be blocked anyway for spamming. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 18:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
The following are Possible:
There's hardly any overlap between these accounts, but they all appear to be editing in the same general area. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note: All accounts marked {{
likely}} have been indef blocked and tagged.
Tiptoety
talk
21:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note:
ResearchEditor (
talk ·
contribs) has been indef blocked, and ArbCom has been notified.
Tiptoety
talk
22:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC) |
For sockpuppet investigations after January, 2009, see
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ResearchEditor/Archive
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 18:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: note |
That seems to be the lot. Possible ResearchEditor sockpuppets. All added the exact same information and citations to multiple pages using a series of throwaway accounts. The POV and sources suggest RE, promoting the discredited idea that there's any weight to the satanic ritual abuse moral panic, the use of the extreme abuse surveys (G4 speedied as a recreation of the Extreme Abuse Survey with an AFD here) and Randy Noblitt's discredited beliefs about satanic ritual abuse. All are single-purpose accounts that have only one topic's worth of edits, and redlinked talk and user pages. If it's not RE, then I would be very surprised, and even if not I can't concieve that it's not someone else sockpuppeting. If not RFCU-ed, accounts should probably be blocked anyway for spamming. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 18:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
The following are Possible:
There's hardly any overlap between these accounts, but they all appear to be editing in the same general area. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note: All accounts marked {{
likely}} have been indef blocked and tagged.
Tiptoety
talk
21:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note:
ResearchEditor (
talk ·
contribs) has been indef blocked, and ArbCom has been notified.
Tiptoety
talk
22:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC) |