request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 09:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
I believe Ray andrew may be evading a 3RR block, the Proctor spock ( talk · contribs) account was created today and within minutes began reverting changes in an article similar to the one Ray andrew was blocked for edit warring on. — Locke Cole • t • c 09:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't even see why this warranted a check, if you look at the time stamps Proctor spock's first edit was within hours of my ban being lifted. Not to mention the topic at hand in this 3rr block was controversial, and is still under discussion, with many other editors raising objections to Locke Cole's changes, so it would be reasonable for interested parties to make an account and enter the "debate". Furthermore I am upset that even now with no proof Locke Cole is still acusing me of having sock puppets on public talk pages in an effort to discredit me ( Talk:Comparison_of_high_definition_optical_disc_formats#Discussion). I know Locke Cole has a history of harassment on wikipedia ( Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Locke_Cole), and I don't think the mods should stand by and do nothing but approve his every request. Furthermore I dont like the presumption of guilt, "Likely" just because the other editor is using an open proxy with no other evidence, how about "Possible"? -- Ray andrew ( talk) 20:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 09:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
I believe Ray andrew may be evading a 3RR block, the Proctor spock ( talk · contribs) account was created today and within minutes began reverting changes in an article similar to the one Ray andrew was blocked for edit warring on. — Locke Cole • t • c 09:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't even see why this warranted a check, if you look at the time stamps Proctor spock's first edit was within hours of my ban being lifted. Not to mention the topic at hand in this 3rr block was controversial, and is still under discussion, with many other editors raising objections to Locke Cole's changes, so it would be reasonable for interested parties to make an account and enter the "debate". Furthermore I am upset that even now with no proof Locke Cole is still acusing me of having sock puppets on public talk pages in an effort to discredit me ( Talk:Comparison_of_high_definition_optical_disc_formats#Discussion). I know Locke Cole has a history of harassment on wikipedia ( Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Locke_Cole), and I don't think the mods should stand by and do nothing but approve his every request. Furthermore I dont like the presumption of guilt, "Likely" just because the other editor is using an open proxy with no other evidence, how about "Possible"? -- Ray andrew ( talk) 20:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)