User:Ragusan is a constructive editor of the Wikipedia, however administrator User:Slowking Man has indef-blocked him under the suspicions of being User:Moroccan Spaniard's (a throwaway account that vandal-moved numerous pages) sockpuppet. Here on his/her talk page administrator User:Dmcdevit with CheckUser powers confirmed that he was a sockpuppet, but considering the edits of the two, that seems very doubtful. I do not accuse these two admins of bad work or lies, but considering these circumstances, I think that a proper CheckUser request (which wasn't made) should be made. No lack of respect, and cheers! PaxEquilibrium 18:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Declined. There is no requirement that checkuser requests be listed here first. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
WTF OMG???
<quote>
I've run a thorough CheckUser, as you requested, and found some nteresting results. Moroccan Spaniard ( talk · contribs) is also Spaniard de Morocco ( talk · contribs), Ragusan ( talk · contribs), Celtmist ( talk · contribs), AlfredG ( talk · contribs), Harvatov ( talk · contribs), PANONNIAN ( talk · contribs) (the impostor), Votavra ( talk · contribs), and JeremyQ ( talk · contribs), all of which clearly fit the editing pattern, and a couple of other Coon-related username-blocked accounts. Since it's a static IP, I've blocked it for a month. Dmcdevit· t 22:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
</quote>
I was involved one way or another with most of the users you note above. What I know previously is:
Well, if all of those are one same person, we're dealing with the most schizophrenic user in the history of Wikipedia. While I certainly trust the CheckUser, it seems plausible that they're using an overly public computer—yes, I know it's a cheap excuse, but I really can't imagine a single person who would do so disparate edits. Duja ► 08:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Ragusan is a constructive editor of the Wikipedia, however administrator User:Slowking Man has indef-blocked him under the suspicions of being User:Moroccan Spaniard's (a throwaway account that vandal-moved numerous pages) sockpuppet. Here on his/her talk page administrator User:Dmcdevit with CheckUser powers confirmed that he was a sockpuppet, but considering the edits of the two, that seems very doubtful. I do not accuse these two admins of bad work or lies, but considering these circumstances, I think that a proper CheckUser request (which wasn't made) should be made. No lack of respect, and cheers! PaxEquilibrium 18:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Declined. There is no requirement that checkuser requests be listed here first. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
WTF OMG???
<quote>
I've run a thorough CheckUser, as you requested, and found some nteresting results. Moroccan Spaniard ( talk · contribs) is also Spaniard de Morocco ( talk · contribs), Ragusan ( talk · contribs), Celtmist ( talk · contribs), AlfredG ( talk · contribs), Harvatov ( talk · contribs), PANONNIAN ( talk · contribs) (the impostor), Votavra ( talk · contribs), and JeremyQ ( talk · contribs), all of which clearly fit the editing pattern, and a couple of other Coon-related username-blocked accounts. Since it's a static IP, I've blocked it for a month. Dmcdevit· t 22:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
</quote>
I was involved one way or another with most of the users you note above. What I know previously is:
Well, if all of those are one same person, we're dealing with the most schizophrenic user in the history of Wikipedia. While I certainly trust the CheckUser, it seems plausible that they're using an overly public computer—yes, I know it's a cheap excuse, but I really can't imagine a single person who would do so disparate edits. Duja ► 08:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)