If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pernambuco}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Kertu3 has only 4 contributions in Wikipedia - 2 of them in 18 February, when he started his wikilife accusing others of sockpuppetry (strange for a newbie!, it seems he knows a lot about editing problems in Wikipedia!) and other 2 today when he vandalized
Transnistria article
[1],
[2]. As today he appeared 2 minutes after Pernambuco did a similar edit I suspect Kertu3 is a sockpuppet of Pernambuco. In 18 February he also took Pernambuco's side in debates about Transnistria article.
Code letter: C, F (I am not totally sure about that, it is my first time doing this, hopefully, I got them:))
These guys act suspicious and emphsize on similar articles. I think they are sock puppets of each other.
Sosomk 02:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Additional information needed Reasoning? Diffs?
Dmcdevit·
t 19:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This was probably requested by Bonaparte to Soso via email. Khoikhoi 00:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Khoi, please do not discriminate E Europeans. Not all of them are right-wing Nationalists. I don't edit articles on wiki right now and I just want to make sure E European articles will be safe from vandalism.
Let me say whay I think, Pernambuco comes very often to the page and really helps
User:William Mauco, it is possible that MarkStreet is the sock of
User:William Mauco,
User:ConsultantJoe is 80% sure that is sock of Mauco, he supported the
ICDISS article in talk page, and then he voted for deletion of the article as is was an annoying evidence after the Edward Lucas :::article published in "The Economist". And
User:William Mauco is strongly related to ICDISS.
So, these similitudes from the one written by
User:William Maucoand the one written at Tiraspol Times (even before the official colaboration of
User:William Mauco with Tiraspol Times- colaboration has become official only after TSO1D has discovered the similitudes) together with the official statement of
User:MarkStreet that he is the editor of the
Tiraspol Times, and reciprocal support shown in the talk page of
talk page:Transnistria (even if with some reciprocal critics sometimes -most probably to avoid being detected), may be considered a true basis for blocking the meatpuppetter (and sockpuppetter)
User:William Mauco -
User:MarkStreet (who was proven before as sockpuppeter, see his sock
User:Henco)... It is possible that in redaction of Tiraspol Times to work more persons. Based on the
ICDISS problem it may be asked a CheckUser also on
User:William Mauco -
User:ConsultantJoe, but it must be explained the problem of ICDISS article (article of Lucas from "The Economist", the mistake of Lucas from his blog when he said that
User:William Mauco worked with Wikipedia before the apparition of
ICDISS article, support of the
User:ConsultantJoe for ICDISS and then suddently the change of opinion for deletion of the paper). I asked myself if admins from Wikipedia do have some time to analyse all this in detail. IP from
User:William Mauco was from Venezuela, but
User:William Mauco has written that he is from England (UK) and he was borned in India.
I suggest a blocking of the meat/sock puppeter.
Sosomk 16:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
"C" refers to "ongoing, serious pattern vandalism", which none of the above users have committed, and "F" refers to "evasion of community-based bans or blocks". None of the above users have ever been blocked. Khoikhoi 19:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Well, nice to know that some users are allowed to create sock poppets on wiki. No wonder that wikipedia is
not a democracySosomk 22:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pernambuco}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Kertu3 has only 4 contributions in Wikipedia - 2 of them in 18 February, when he started his wikilife accusing others of sockpuppetry (strange for a newbie!, it seems he knows a lot about editing problems in Wikipedia!) and other 2 today when he vandalized
Transnistria article
[1],
[2]. As today he appeared 2 minutes after Pernambuco did a similar edit I suspect Kertu3 is a sockpuppet of Pernambuco. In 18 February he also took Pernambuco's side in debates about Transnistria article.
Code letter: C, F (I am not totally sure about that, it is my first time doing this, hopefully, I got them:))
These guys act suspicious and emphsize on similar articles. I think they are sock puppets of each other.
Sosomk 02:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Additional information needed Reasoning? Diffs?
Dmcdevit·
t 19:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
This was probably requested by Bonaparte to Soso via email. Khoikhoi 00:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Khoi, please do not discriminate E Europeans. Not all of them are right-wing Nationalists. I don't edit articles on wiki right now and I just want to make sure E European articles will be safe from vandalism.
Let me say whay I think, Pernambuco comes very often to the page and really helps
User:William Mauco, it is possible that MarkStreet is the sock of
User:William Mauco,
User:ConsultantJoe is 80% sure that is sock of Mauco, he supported the
ICDISS article in talk page, and then he voted for deletion of the article as is was an annoying evidence after the Edward Lucas :::article published in "The Economist". And
User:William Mauco is strongly related to ICDISS.
So, these similitudes from the one written by
User:William Maucoand the one written at Tiraspol Times (even before the official colaboration of
User:William Mauco with Tiraspol Times- colaboration has become official only after TSO1D has discovered the similitudes) together with the official statement of
User:MarkStreet that he is the editor of the
Tiraspol Times, and reciprocal support shown in the talk page of
talk page:Transnistria (even if with some reciprocal critics sometimes -most probably to avoid being detected), may be considered a true basis for blocking the meatpuppetter (and sockpuppetter)
User:William Mauco -
User:MarkStreet (who was proven before as sockpuppeter, see his sock
User:Henco)... It is possible that in redaction of Tiraspol Times to work more persons. Based on the
ICDISS problem it may be asked a CheckUser also on
User:William Mauco -
User:ConsultantJoe, but it must be explained the problem of ICDISS article (article of Lucas from "The Economist", the mistake of Lucas from his blog when he said that
User:William Mauco worked with Wikipedia before the apparition of
ICDISS article, support of the
User:ConsultantJoe for ICDISS and then suddently the change of opinion for deletion of the paper). I asked myself if admins from Wikipedia do have some time to analyse all this in detail. IP from
User:William Mauco was from Venezuela, but
User:William Mauco has written that he is from England (UK) and he was borned in India.
I suggest a blocking of the meat/sock puppeter.
Sosomk 16:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
"C" refers to "ongoing, serious pattern vandalism", which none of the above users have committed, and "F" refers to "evasion of community-based bans or blocks". None of the above users have ever been blocked. Khoikhoi 19:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Well, nice to know that some users are allowed to create sock poppets on wiki. No wonder that wikipedia is
not a democracySosomk 22:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.