request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 05:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
Not Related: This request is to review the following sockpuppets which are put under my id: user:sundaram7. They are not related. Please remove them from my user id. This case is as per request from administrators from AnI (Invalod Sockpuppetry Decision) : [1]
From different discussions, it is found that these users are in different IP Domains!
CODE: A, C,D and F. Check for code A for non-IP matches as described below. Check for code C for who did the real vandalism User_talk:Fear_the_Fire. Check the discussions as described to see code F.
Evidences:
Hope to get a legitimate decision on this case -- Sundaram7 05:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC).
Declined. I have no idea what you are asking for here. Self-requested checks are not fulfilled, and these account are all old. Dmcdevit· t 19:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC) |
The first 4 users voted the same way (keep) at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Popular_Front_of_India. Bharatson and Ramduke haven't made any edits outside of AfD. The others have also been involved in edit-warring at National Development Front. I had to fully protect the page today because of the constant edit-warring. See the history of the article to see the many instances where they have reverted to each others' version to evade 3RR. Aksi_great ( talk) 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Additional information needed Per E (3RR violation using socks), please list four differences showing the 3RR violation. Real96 21:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
It is true that I had to do many reverts because the article is constantly attacked by vandals. See the The talk page, where i have discussed reasons for every reverts( [27], [28]). Some editors have tried to change the entire structure and content of the article( [29], [30]) in one stretch , for which I followed a step by step approach to keep the article in the same framework which was created by admins here and also push the POVs under critisism section so that there wont be constant fights regarding those issues. I don't think there was a need for me to breach 3RR. It doesn't make any sense that i have sock puppet just to prevent 3rr warnings. There are lot of people and lot of sock puppets trying to destroy the article of which few are already blocked.
Regarding the first set, I see user User:NotBound involved in it. it looks like he was active just for that day in wikipedia. Maybe User:NotBound and User:Wrong_not(was listed as my sock puppet) are one. User:Wrong_not was blocked and this might be his new ID. I have already said that i am working on a large LAN when I got the sock puppet warning from User:Thatcher131 ( [31]) Regarding the second set, i am not involved and there is again a chance that User:Truehindu == User:NotBound. -- Fear the Fire 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
BhaiSaab ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and TerryJ-Ho ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are banned for one year per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar, and have already been caught using sockpuppets at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MinaretDk. Pens withdrawn and Wrong_not are two new accounts that have been edit warring with an anonymous IP editor from the University of Texas at Austin (obviously Hkelkar) at National Development Front ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Thatcher131 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 05:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC) |
Not Related: This request is to review the following sockpuppets which are put under my id: user:sundaram7. They are not related. Please remove them from my user id. This case is as per request from administrators from AnI (Invalod Sockpuppetry Decision) : [1]
From different discussions, it is found that these users are in different IP Domains!
CODE: A, C,D and F. Check for code A for non-IP matches as described below. Check for code C for who did the real vandalism User_talk:Fear_the_Fire. Check the discussions as described to see code F.
Evidences:
Hope to get a legitimate decision on this case -- Sundaram7 05:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC).
Declined. I have no idea what you are asking for here. Self-requested checks are not fulfilled, and these account are all old. Dmcdevit· t 19:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC) |
The first 4 users voted the same way (keep) at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Popular_Front_of_India. Bharatson and Ramduke haven't made any edits outside of AfD. The others have also been involved in edit-warring at National Development Front. I had to fully protect the page today because of the constant edit-warring. See the history of the article to see the many instances where they have reverted to each others' version to evade 3RR. Aksi_great ( talk) 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Additional information needed Per E (3RR violation using socks), please list four differences showing the 3RR violation. Real96 21:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
It is true that I had to do many reverts because the article is constantly attacked by vandals. See the The talk page, where i have discussed reasons for every reverts( [27], [28]). Some editors have tried to change the entire structure and content of the article( [29], [30]) in one stretch , for which I followed a step by step approach to keep the article in the same framework which was created by admins here and also push the POVs under critisism section so that there wont be constant fights regarding those issues. I don't think there was a need for me to breach 3RR. It doesn't make any sense that i have sock puppet just to prevent 3rr warnings. There are lot of people and lot of sock puppets trying to destroy the article of which few are already blocked.
Regarding the first set, I see user User:NotBound involved in it. it looks like he was active just for that day in wikipedia. Maybe User:NotBound and User:Wrong_not(was listed as my sock puppet) are one. User:Wrong_not was blocked and this might be his new ID. I have already said that i am working on a large LAN when I got the sock puppet warning from User:Thatcher131 ( [31]) Regarding the second set, i am not involved and there is again a chance that User:Truehindu == User:NotBound. -- Fear the Fire 12:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
BhaiSaab ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and TerryJ-Ho ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are banned for one year per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar, and have already been caught using sockpuppets at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MinaretDk. Pens withdrawn and Wrong_not are two new accounts that have been edit warring with an anonymous IP editor from the University of Texas at Austin (obviously Hkelkar) at National Development Front ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Thatcher131 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)