request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 01:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
While Nationalist has had 12 likely or confirmed socks, this new user has been editing aggressively similarly to Nationalist. He/She also had an edit summary of "stop green washing Wikipedia," "green" being one of the major political camps in Taiwan, like one of Nationalist's socks did before ( "You are a Pan Green Pawn Mr. Da bian (poop)").
Like Nationalist, all of his/her edits are related to the politics of Taiwan and the username of Beautiful Formosa is similar to the previous sock of Taiwanlove, which has reference to the island of Taiwan.-- Jerrch 01:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
Possible IP sock of the Abusive Sockpuppeteer Nationalist/TingMing due to the way he/she deals with other editors and the overly over/extreme Nationalism/Anti-PRC edits and comments. nat t a n g 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Heqong ( talk · contribs), formerly known as Chiang Kai-shek back after a long absence. Immediately went onto articles frequented by the two aforementioned sock-puppeteers and made pretty much the exact same changes and unilateral moves. - Loren 21:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Clerk assistance requested: I believe two of these were already checked, yes? Voice-of-All 05:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Likely. Voice-of-All 06:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 23:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting a checkuser on Luden. TingMing is currently indef blocked. Luden has a similar edit pattern with TingMing, His edits are also all political. They both like to replace Taiwan with Republic of China. The edit summary here is really similar to TingMing's tone ( "correct edit").
I'm not sure about Nationalist though. His block has expired since May, but he hasn't used it, I suspect that he probably used TingMing as his main account.-- Jerry 23:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 10:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Navality ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below). Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!| Email Me! 10:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 19:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Gradds ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below). The account was created only one minute earlier than his first edit, which tackles directly on the article Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall which has a brief history of edit warring involving TingMing and his sockpuppets just recently. Other edits in his contribution list display similar edit patterns to those of TingMing's and/or Nationalist's. Specifically, with this edit in the talk page, it shows that he is already familiar with Wikipedia to the extent of an established user, different to most new Wikipedia editors. Vic 226 說 19:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 02:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Return of the Sith ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below), whose recent confirmed sockpuppet (see above) was blocked indefinitely. User was created today subsequent to the blocking of TingMing ( talk · contribs) for 3RR violation, and began to edit various articles and user pages with the same edit patterns and type of articles targeted ( Chen Shui-bian, User talk:TingMing, Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, Taiwan Solidarity Union, User talk:Loren36, etc.) are similar to those of TingMing's/Nationalist's as described above. Return of the Sith ( talk · contribs) has already been blocked, but this request will lend evidence to the Arbitration Committee case regarding TingMing, should the checkuser prove true. -- Folic Acid 02:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Same request. Same reason. Same evidence (see above/below). Only different name/account. Vic 226 說 05:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Think he'll be worth listed in WP:LTA sooner or later. Vic 226 說 05:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Requesting CheckUser on DoctorPP ( talk · contribs), as possible sockpuppet of Nationalist ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) and or TingMing ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), both of whom have been blocked for disruptive editing, the former of whom has a long history of block evasion with sockpuppets and attempts to thwart CUs through IP manipulation. The latter was found by CU to be a possible Nationalist sock (IP showed same region, but different ISP), and displayed extremely similar editing patterns.
The following evidence is provided:
Additional notes (may or may not be relevent):
Confirmed that DoctorPP is TingMing. Dmcdevit· t 18:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Requesting checkuser on JohnLo1223 ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below), whose recent confirmed sockpuppet (see above) was blocked indefinitely. Edit patterns and type of articles targeted ( Legal status of Taiwan related) are similar to those of TingMing's/Nationalist's as described above with DoctorPP especially these two edits [5] [6]. Vic 226 說 06:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Likely. Voice-of-All 17:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 19:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting a checkuser on TingMing ( talk · contribs). Although Nationalist said, in Alex678's talkpage, that he's leaving Wikipedia forever, this user edits like him. As you can see in his/her contribution page, almost every edit he has made is edit to get rid of (Taiwan).-- Jerrypp772000 19:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I am not User: Nationalist. Jerrypp772000's edits are controversial by themselves. Do not try to frame me. TingMing 00:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) |
This user had been editing the same articles that Central Mountain did, using the same editing patterns. Here, he accused me of being racist and a DPP supportor, like Nationalist had done before. This shows that Alex678 tends to emphasize the official name similarly to Nationalist.-- Jerrypp772000 22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 02:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC) |
I don't like revisiting something I just hate to get my hands on again, but it appears that I have to intervene once more as new user Central Mountain has already gotten into edit conflict with multiple users, such as Nlu, Niohe, and Ideogram. The conflict is still about the naming convention/conflict about Taiwan-related issues concerning the political status of Taiwan, and right now it's one user (Central Mountain) against other multiple editors.
I think I was just wasting your and my time above. To sum it up, his actions are very similar to that of Nationalist, who is still blocked until approximately March 17. To point out the similarity, Nationalist apparently idolizes Chiang Kai-shek as well as Sun Yat-sen in his talk page (Chinese; translator might help). In the following edits ( [7] and followed by reverts stating that "His recognitions are really fact", [8]) Central Mountain is praising Chiang Kai-shek while criticizing the current government (which is Taiwan independence-oriented, and Nationalist has stated in his talk page that he is against independence) in a possible POV/ OR tone (see also [9], [10]). Other edits also reflect the edit patterns Nationalist used to make along with his sockpuppets (e.g. [11], [12], [13]). Also, the fact that he made his first edit on Republic of China just two minutes after his account creation suggests his political motive that Nationalist has.
Quoted from Loren in the archive below: "If this is confirmed, this will be the third time Nationalist has attempted to evade administrative blocks using confirmed sockpuppets (even more times if you count unconfirmed socks), and further action may be required." Vic 226 02:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Requesting a checkuser on User:Morphi. This user has similar editing patterns to those of Nationalist. Like Nationalist, he/she like to emphasize the usage of the official name. Although this user is currently blocked for violating the 3RR, I found him/her similar to Nationalist. And I don't know if this would be helpful.-- Jerrypp772000 23:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: My apologies to Vic226 for archiving early. Checkusers, please fulfill request directly above this line regarding Morphi. -- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 23:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC |
This account was created right after Sid212 [a confirmed sockpuppet, see prior request] was blocked for sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nationalist (2nd)) by Nationalist (who is currently blocked for a month). As soon as the account was created, it immediately start making what can be contested as very similar POV edits that Nationalist/Taiwanlove/Sid212 had been pushing. This account also tackles on similar articles in which Nationalist have been edit warring on POV edits. Vic 226 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi (not again), Jerrypp772000 noticed activities from User:Taiwan53 very similar to those of Nationalist. After he had created his account, he made his first edit right on Township (Taiwan) in less than one minute, and it was followed up with several other edits on Taiwan-related articles. We're afraid that this is yet another code-F RfCU. Vic 226 02:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Requesting a checkuser on Chunghwa Republic ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), registered on 2-18-2007, shortly after User:Nationalist's last sock was blocked. His/her editing patterns and choice of username are very similar to those of User:Nationalist and his/her confirmed sockpuppets. The fact that this user immediately demanded an IP check after being blocked suggests a strong farmiliarity with Wikipedia, and is consistant with past behavior of other confirmed socks used by Nationalist. If this is confirmed, this will be the third time Nationalist has attempted to evade administrative blocks using confirmed sockpuppets (even more times if you count unconfirmed socks), and further action may be required. - Loren 10:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 02:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
This is directly copied from Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Nationalist:
After Nationalist was blocked the fifth time, User:Sid212, who is currently suspected as a "likely" sockpuppet of Nationalist, became active again a few days later. Before that, Sid212 became inactive after this edit when Nationalist made his first edit (compare its time with that of the previous edit) after his fourth block was expired.
Sid212 has been checked before by jpgordon, and the result was likely but not confirmed. The following is the exact quotation of him:
I wonder if it is possible to recheck further on Sid212, or maybe it's only a waste of time. Since I'm not sure, I made the above request again just to be on the safe side. Thanks, Vic 226 02:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
I suspect User:Nationalist has used User:Taiwanlove as sockpuppet to evade the 3RR violation based on this history of the article Chuang Chia-jung. Vic226( chat) 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
(Also, I wonder why would a new user head straight to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) among all Wikipedia policies and guidelines, as shown here.
Thanks in advance for taking the trouble! Vic226( chat) 04:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 01:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
While Nationalist has had 12 likely or confirmed socks, this new user has been editing aggressively similarly to Nationalist. He/She also had an edit summary of "stop green washing Wikipedia," "green" being one of the major political camps in Taiwan, like one of Nationalist's socks did before ( "You are a Pan Green Pawn Mr. Da bian (poop)").
Like Nationalist, all of his/her edits are related to the politics of Taiwan and the username of Beautiful Formosa is similar to the previous sock of Taiwanlove, which has reference to the island of Taiwan.-- Jerrch 01:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC) |
Possible IP sock of the Abusive Sockpuppeteer Nationalist/TingMing due to the way he/she deals with other editors and the overly over/extreme Nationalism/Anti-PRC edits and comments. nat t a n g 17:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Heqong ( talk · contribs), formerly known as Chiang Kai-shek back after a long absence. Immediately went onto articles frequented by the two aforementioned sock-puppeteers and made pretty much the exact same changes and unilateral moves. - Loren 21:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Clerk assistance requested: I believe two of these were already checked, yes? Voice-of-All 05:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Likely. Voice-of-All 06:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 23:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting a checkuser on Luden. TingMing is currently indef blocked. Luden has a similar edit pattern with TingMing, His edits are also all political. They both like to replace Taiwan with Republic of China. The edit summary here is really similar to TingMing's tone ( "correct edit").
I'm not sure about Nationalist though. His block has expired since May, but he hasn't used it, I suspect that he probably used TingMing as his main account.-- Jerry 23:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 10:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Navality ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below). Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!| Email Me! 10:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 19:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Gradds ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below). The account was created only one minute earlier than his first edit, which tackles directly on the article Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall which has a brief history of edit warring involving TingMing and his sockpuppets just recently. Other edits in his contribution list display similar edit patterns to those of TingMing's and/or Nationalist's. Specifically, with this edit in the talk page, it shows that he is already familiar with Wikipedia to the extent of an established user, different to most new Wikipedia editors. Vic 226 說 19:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 02:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting checkuser on Return of the Sith ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below), whose recent confirmed sockpuppet (see above) was blocked indefinitely. User was created today subsequent to the blocking of TingMing ( talk · contribs) for 3RR violation, and began to edit various articles and user pages with the same edit patterns and type of articles targeted ( Chen Shui-bian, User talk:TingMing, Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, Taiwan Solidarity Union, User talk:Loren36, etc.) are similar to those of TingMing's/Nationalist's as described above. Return of the Sith ( talk · contribs) has already been blocked, but this request will lend evidence to the Arbitration Committee case regarding TingMing, should the checkuser prove true. -- Folic Acid 02:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Same request. Same reason. Same evidence (see above/below). Only different name/account. Vic 226 說 05:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Think he'll be worth listed in WP:LTA sooner or later. Vic 226 說 05:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Requesting CheckUser on DoctorPP ( talk · contribs), as possible sockpuppet of Nationalist ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) and or TingMing ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), both of whom have been blocked for disruptive editing, the former of whom has a long history of block evasion with sockpuppets and attempts to thwart CUs through IP manipulation. The latter was found by CU to be a possible Nationalist sock (IP showed same region, but different ISP), and displayed extremely similar editing patterns.
The following evidence is provided:
Additional notes (may or may not be relevent):
Confirmed that DoctorPP is TingMing. Dmcdevit· t 18:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Requesting checkuser on JohnLo1223 ( talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of TingMing (of whom Nationalist may be the sockpuppeteer based on the result in the archive below), whose recent confirmed sockpuppet (see above) was blocked indefinitely. Edit patterns and type of articles targeted ( Legal status of Taiwan related) are similar to those of TingMing's/Nationalist's as described above with DoctorPP especially these two edits [5] [6]. Vic 226 說 06:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Likely. Voice-of-All 17:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 19:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC) |
Requesting a checkuser on TingMing ( talk · contribs). Although Nationalist said, in Alex678's talkpage, that he's leaving Wikipedia forever, this user edits like him. As you can see in his/her contribution page, almost every edit he has made is edit to get rid of (Taiwan).-- Jerrypp772000 19:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I am not User: Nationalist. Jerrypp772000's edits are controversial by themselves. Do not try to frame me. TingMing 00:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC) |
This user had been editing the same articles that Central Mountain did, using the same editing patterns. Here, he accused me of being racist and a DPP supportor, like Nationalist had done before. This shows that Alex678 tends to emphasize the official name similarly to Nationalist.-- Jerrypp772000 22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 02:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC) |
I don't like revisiting something I just hate to get my hands on again, but it appears that I have to intervene once more as new user Central Mountain has already gotten into edit conflict with multiple users, such as Nlu, Niohe, and Ideogram. The conflict is still about the naming convention/conflict about Taiwan-related issues concerning the political status of Taiwan, and right now it's one user (Central Mountain) against other multiple editors.
I think I was just wasting your and my time above. To sum it up, his actions are very similar to that of Nationalist, who is still blocked until approximately March 17. To point out the similarity, Nationalist apparently idolizes Chiang Kai-shek as well as Sun Yat-sen in his talk page (Chinese; translator might help). In the following edits ( [7] and followed by reverts stating that "His recognitions are really fact", [8]) Central Mountain is praising Chiang Kai-shek while criticizing the current government (which is Taiwan independence-oriented, and Nationalist has stated in his talk page that he is against independence) in a possible POV/ OR tone (see also [9], [10]). Other edits also reflect the edit patterns Nationalist used to make along with his sockpuppets (e.g. [11], [12], [13]). Also, the fact that he made his first edit on Republic of China just two minutes after his account creation suggests his political motive that Nationalist has.
Quoted from Loren in the archive below: "If this is confirmed, this will be the third time Nationalist has attempted to evade administrative blocks using confirmed sockpuppets (even more times if you count unconfirmed socks), and further action may be required." Vic 226 02:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Requesting a checkuser on User:Morphi. This user has similar editing patterns to those of Nationalist. Like Nationalist, he/she like to emphasize the usage of the official name. Although this user is currently blocked for violating the 3RR, I found him/her similar to Nationalist. And I don't know if this would be helpful.-- Jerrypp772000 23:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: My apologies to Vic226 for archiving early. Checkusers, please fulfill request directly above this line regarding Morphi. -- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 23:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC |
This account was created right after Sid212 [a confirmed sockpuppet, see prior request] was blocked for sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nationalist (2nd)) by Nationalist (who is currently blocked for a month). As soon as the account was created, it immediately start making what can be contested as very similar POV edits that Nationalist/Taiwanlove/Sid212 had been pushing. This account also tackles on similar articles in which Nationalist have been edit warring on POV edits. Vic 226 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi (not again), Jerrypp772000 noticed activities from User:Taiwan53 very similar to those of Nationalist. After he had created his account, he made his first edit right on Township (Taiwan) in less than one minute, and it was followed up with several other edits on Taiwan-related articles. We're afraid that this is yet another code-F RfCU. Vic 226 02:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Requesting a checkuser on Chunghwa Republic ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), registered on 2-18-2007, shortly after User:Nationalist's last sock was blocked. His/her editing patterns and choice of username are very similar to those of User:Nationalist and his/her confirmed sockpuppets. The fact that this user immediately demanded an IP check after being blocked suggests a strong farmiliarity with Wikipedia, and is consistant with past behavior of other confirmed socks used by Nationalist. If this is confirmed, this will be the third time Nationalist has attempted to evade administrative blocks using confirmed sockpuppets (even more times if you count unconfirmed socks), and further action may be required. - Loren 10:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 02:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC) |
This is directly copied from Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Nationalist:
After Nationalist was blocked the fifth time, User:Sid212, who is currently suspected as a "likely" sockpuppet of Nationalist, became active again a few days later. Before that, Sid212 became inactive after this edit when Nationalist made his first edit (compare its time with that of the previous edit) after his fourth block was expired.
Sid212 has been checked before by jpgordon, and the result was likely but not confirmed. The following is the exact quotation of him:
I wonder if it is possible to recheck further on Sid212, or maybe it's only a waste of time. Since I'm not sure, I made the above request again just to be on the safe side. Thanks, Vic 226 02:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
I suspect User:Nationalist has used User:Taiwanlove as sockpuppet to evade the 3RR violation based on this history of the article Chuang Chia-jung. Vic226( chat) 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
(Also, I wonder why would a new user head straight to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) among all Wikipedia policies and guidelines, as shown here.
Thanks in advance for taking the trouble! Vic226( chat) 04:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)