request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 10:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC) |
After some editwarring on Moldova, the article was protected; two days later, the account of user Brodnik was created on November 3 and he jumped right in the controversial content by starting to make reverts, this time on History of Moldova; making me a bit suspecious on who he may be. Thus Spake Anittas 10:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Declined. Anittas, please do not be offended. I understand your concerns, and I thank you for helping protect the encyclopedia. However, as checkusers we are mandated to only perform checks when we believe it is in the best interests of the encylopedia, and when there is sufficient evidence to suspect that we can prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. I do not believe there is enough evidence linking the users together to perform the check at this time. Should you find more evidence linking the two accounts together, please do not hesitate to file another request. I encourge other checkusers to review this request, and overturn my decline without hesitation if they feel this is appopriate. --
Deskana
(talk)
00:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 10:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC) |
After some editwarring on Moldova, the article was protected; two days later, the account of user Brodnik was created on November 3 and he jumped right in the controversial content by starting to make reverts, this time on History of Moldova; making me a bit suspecious on who he may be. Thus Spake Anittas 10:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Declined. Anittas, please do not be offended. I understand your concerns, and I thank you for helping protect the encyclopedia. However, as checkusers we are mandated to only perform checks when we believe it is in the best interests of the encylopedia, and when there is sufficient evidence to suspect that we can prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. I do not believe there is enough evidence linking the users together to perform the check at this time. Should you find more evidence linking the two accounts together, please do not hesitate to file another request. I encourge other checkusers to review this request, and overturn my decline without hesitation if they feel this is appopriate. --
Deskana
(talk)
00:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)