From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matilda}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Matilda

  • Supporting evidence: I have a sneaking suspicion that the user Bidgee might be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet(used in non-derogatory intent) for the administrator Matilda based on her behaviour. After I left these messages on Matilda's talkpage [1], [2] Bidgee came rushing to her defence with whom I have never came in contact with my whole life, who was not been involved in any of the matters we were referring to and who has never made an edit at the same time on the same day based on the contributions made by the two. Really what harm is there in checking for clarification? I do not wish to know her IP and if Matilda is in fact using a sockpuppet then my suspicions will be confirmed. If not no harm done. (Note: I told Matilda if she warned me again I would report her, so she did not and instead Bidgee did) TeePee-20.7 ( talk) 06:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
no Declined - fish  CheckUser is not for fishing - really sorry, but this example is the classic definition - Alison 07:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
For the record, see
TeePee-20.7 was subsequently blocked. A strong consensus emerged that TeePee-20.7's behaviour was uncivil; one aspect of this was TeePee-20.7's bad faith accusations of fellow editors such as Matilda and Bidgee.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribs) 03:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matilda}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Matilda

  • Supporting evidence: I have a sneaking suspicion that the user Bidgee might be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet(used in non-derogatory intent) for the administrator Matilda based on her behaviour. After I left these messages on Matilda's talkpage [1], [2] Bidgee came rushing to her defence with whom I have never came in contact with my whole life, who was not been involved in any of the matters we were referring to and who has never made an edit at the same time on the same day based on the contributions made by the two. Really what harm is there in checking for clarification? I do not wish to know her IP and if Matilda is in fact using a sockpuppet then my suspicions will be confirmed. If not no harm done. (Note: I told Matilda if she warned me again I would report her, so she did not and instead Bidgee did) TeePee-20.7 ( talk) 06:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
no Declined - fish  CheckUser is not for fishing - really sorry, but this example is the classic definition - Alison 07:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply
For the record, see
TeePee-20.7 was subsequently blocked. A strong consensus emerged that TeePee-20.7's behaviour was uncivil; one aspect of this was TeePee-20.7's bad faith accusations of fellow editors such as Matilda and Bidgee.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribs) 03:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook