Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/GooseCreek}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


GooseCreek

request links: main •  •  links •  history •  watch •  talk
Filed: 16:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

We appear to have a swarm of sockpuppets or meat puppets disrupting Talk:Waterboarding#Shibumi2 second attempt at new article lead. There is an ongoing RfC at Talk:Waterboarding/Definition about the question of whether Waterboarding is torture or not. This is a high importance, high visibility political topic where there is a strong incentive for lobbying via Wikipedia.

The above editors are all either SPAs, or other accounts with low edit counts that have copied the identical formatting for their votes: ’’’Support.’’’ Please also check if any of the above match any banned users. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 16:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

information Note: - as IP editors have been directly involved in votestacking and disruption/personal attacks here, I'm including them per policy.
 Confirmed - PennState21 ( talk · contribs) = Harry Lives! ( talk · contribs) = Shibumi2 ( talk · contribs) = 68.29.174.61 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Red X Unrelated - the other IP addresses, and there are no underlying accounts
Red X Unrelated - Neutral Good ( talk · contribs) - Alison ❤ 19:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Because I am on it ;). -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
 Clerk note: tagged and blocked the puppets. Hardblocked the IP and the main account for 2 weeks, considering the main is here since January. -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sorry for butting in :) henrik• talk 19:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
You guys/gals are good! Badagnani ( talk) 19:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
It wasn't clear from earlier, but GooseCreek ( talk · contribs) is Red X Unrelated to any of the others - Alison ❤ 19:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes, that account is unrelated and this is the second checkuser request in as many weeks that s/he has survived - Alison ❤ 19:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Note: 209.221.240.193

User talk:209.221.240.193 has an established and demonstrated history of sockpuppetry related to articles along these political tones, which has lead to one arbitration hearing related to this, for User:DeanHinnen and User:BryanFromPalatine. Details at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. These editors blocked here also (such as Shibumi2, the oldest) had also participated on the Free Republic article in the same time frame as banned user BryanFromPalatine/DeanHinnen, when he was socking. Would it be possible to check for accounts on 209.221.240.193 ( talk + · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log)) participating with multiple accounts on this waterboarding discussion? The 209.221.240.193 has also played a role in the tainted discussions there. Lawrence Cohen 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: moving conversation on the merits of the block and its length to the talk page. Please keep it there... -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 23:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/GooseCreek&oldid=1140544677"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/GooseCreek}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


GooseCreek

request links: main •  •  links •  history •  watch •  talk
Filed: 16:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

We appear to have a swarm of sockpuppets or meat puppets disrupting Talk:Waterboarding#Shibumi2 second attempt at new article lead. There is an ongoing RfC at Talk:Waterboarding/Definition about the question of whether Waterboarding is torture or not. This is a high importance, high visibility political topic where there is a strong incentive for lobbying via Wikipedia.

The above editors are all either SPAs, or other accounts with low edit counts that have copied the identical formatting for their votes: ’’’Support.’’’ Please also check if any of the above match any banned users. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 16:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

information Note: - as IP editors have been directly involved in votestacking and disruption/personal attacks here, I'm including them per policy.
 Confirmed - PennState21 ( talk · contribs) = Harry Lives! ( talk · contribs) = Shibumi2 ( talk · contribs) = 68.29.174.61 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Red X Unrelated - the other IP addresses, and there are no underlying accounts
Red X Unrelated - Neutral Good ( talk · contribs) - Alison ❤ 19:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Because I am on it ;). -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
 Clerk note: tagged and blocked the puppets. Hardblocked the IP and the main account for 2 weeks, considering the main is here since January. -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sorry for butting in :) henrik• talk 19:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
You guys/gals are good! Badagnani ( talk) 19:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
It wasn't clear from earlier, but GooseCreek ( talk · contribs) is Red X Unrelated to any of the others - Alison ❤ 19:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes, that account is unrelated and this is the second checkuser request in as many weeks that s/he has survived - Alison ❤ 19:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply
  • Note: 209.221.240.193

User talk:209.221.240.193 has an established and demonstrated history of sockpuppetry related to articles along these political tones, which has lead to one arbitration hearing related to this, for User:DeanHinnen and User:BryanFromPalatine. Details at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. These editors blocked here also (such as Shibumi2, the oldest) had also participated on the Free Republic article in the same time frame as banned user BryanFromPalatine/DeanHinnen, when he was socking. Would it be possible to check for accounts on 209.221.240.193 ( talk + · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log)) participating with multiple accounts on this waterboarding discussion? The 209.221.240.193 has also played a role in the tainted discussions there. Lawrence Cohen 19:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply

 Clerk note: moving conversation on the merits of the block and its length to the talk page. Please keep it there... -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 23:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC) reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/GooseCreek&oldid=1140544677"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE