If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Firstwind}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The problem with an anon user first occured back in July at
Nantes, which forced an anon block to be placed on the page. On the same day, Firstwind's account was created. In recent weeks, the problem has resurfaced, with both Firstwind and several other anon IPs forcing a further anon block to be placed on Nantes. Further vandalism has occured at
Broken Sword by both Firstwind and these same anon IPs. The user has received a total of 15 warnings at this stage.
Schcambo (
talk)
14:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)reply
What do you need a checkuser for, here? If they're vandalising, they can be blocked. Note that one of the IPs is in Canada and the rest in France; it is impossible that Firstwind is both. --
Deskana(talk)14:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Regarding the IP located in Canada, he/she may have been there at the time, or use an open proxy since edits then made to
Nantes are the same as the ones he usually does.
Mthibault (
talk)
18:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Sure I'm certainly not advocating blocking the IPs but I think a temp block of his/her user account is warranted, don't you think?
Mthibault19:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Firstwind is certainly due for a block of some sort if (s)he continues this behaviour.I don't think blocking the IP addresses is worthwhile, since he'll just skip to a new one. However, Firstwind is on Wikipedia infrequently, so we can currently handle the situation via reversion; if he becomes more persistent, or keeps flouting policy in this way, a block is in his future.
Mindmatrix22:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Firstwind}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The problem with an anon user first occured back in July at
Nantes, which forced an anon block to be placed on the page. On the same day, Firstwind's account was created. In recent weeks, the problem has resurfaced, with both Firstwind and several other anon IPs forcing a further anon block to be placed on Nantes. Further vandalism has occured at
Broken Sword by both Firstwind and these same anon IPs. The user has received a total of 15 warnings at this stage.
Schcambo (
talk)
14:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)reply
What do you need a checkuser for, here? If they're vandalising, they can be blocked. Note that one of the IPs is in Canada and the rest in France; it is impossible that Firstwind is both. --
Deskana(talk)14:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Regarding the IP located in Canada, he/she may have been there at the time, or use an open proxy since edits then made to
Nantes are the same as the ones he usually does.
Mthibault (
talk)
18:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Sure I'm certainly not advocating blocking the IPs but I think a temp block of his/her user account is warranted, don't you think?
Mthibault19:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Firstwind is certainly due for a block of some sort if (s)he continues this behaviour.I don't think blocking the IP addresses is worthwhile, since he'll just skip to a new one. However, Firstwind is on Wikipedia infrequently, so we can currently handle the situation via reversion; if he becomes more persistent, or keeps flouting policy in this way, a block is in his future.
Mindmatrix22:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.