The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
E104421
| request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 01:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
- E104421 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Moorudd ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: G
- Supporting evidence: The IPs have been vandalizing various articles, including Timur, Timurids, Babur, etc. His edits are identical to those of the IP-socks. He also blindly reverted my edit here to the version of the IP, ignoring that I had reverted to the FA consensus. He was corrected by Pejman. But this clearly shows that E104421 does not assume good faith and that his (blind) edits are nationalistically and ethnically motivated, just like the IPs. His latest revert in the Timurid dynasty page is exactly the same as those of the IP socks. It's always the same edit, always the same revert - their edits are identical. And it was the 5th time that E104421 has reverted to the same wrong version, removing authoritative sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Also, E104421 is on a 1RR parole in all Turkish-, Iranian-, Azeri-, and Armenian-related articles. Behnam ( talk) 01:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
-
Unrelated -
E104421 (
talk ·
contribs) to any of them -
Likely -
Moorudd (
talk ·
contribs) to IP Vandal
- Oh I see now. So can users be blocked on "Likely" or if not what else is needed? --
Behnam (
talk)
17:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's not really for me to determine - Alison ❤ 17:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I see now. So can users be blocked on "Likely" or if not what else is needed? --
Behnam (
talk)
17:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- I do not see any edits by the IPs that look like vandalism; it looks like a content dispute, and there does not appear to be any editing violations (such as 3RR violations) as the IPs each only edit for a day and do not overlap or edit war. Plus the content dispute appears to be with banned user Tajik at least some of the time. I don't think any action is needed at this point. Thatcher131 03:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
E104421
| request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 01:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
- E104421 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Moorudd ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: G
- Supporting evidence: The IPs have been vandalizing various articles, including Timur, Timurids, Babur, etc. His edits are identical to those of the IP-socks. He also blindly reverted my edit here to the version of the IP, ignoring that I had reverted to the FA consensus. He was corrected by Pejman. But this clearly shows that E104421 does not assume good faith and that his (blind) edits are nationalistically and ethnically motivated, just like the IPs. His latest revert in the Timurid dynasty page is exactly the same as those of the IP socks. It's always the same edit, always the same revert - their edits are identical. And it was the 5th time that E104421 has reverted to the same wrong version, removing authoritative sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Also, E104421 is on a 1RR parole in all Turkish-, Iranian-, Azeri-, and Armenian-related articles. Behnam ( talk) 01:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
-
Unrelated -
E104421 (
talk ·
contribs) to any of them
-
Likely -
Moorudd (
talk ·
contribs) to IP Vandal
- Oh I see now. So can users be blocked on "Likely" or if not what else is needed? --
Behnam (
talk)
17:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- That's not really for me to determine - Alison ❤ 17:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh I see now. So can users be blocked on "Likely" or if not what else is needed? --
Behnam (
talk)
17:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- I do not see any edits by the IPs that look like vandalism; it looks like a content dispute, and there does not appear to be any editing violations (such as 3RR violations) as the IPs each only edit for a day and do not overlap or edit war. Plus the content dispute appears to be with banned user Tajik at least some of the time. I don't think any action is needed at this point. Thatcher131 03:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.