request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 17:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
While I am aware of the result ( [1]) of this case. The case got rather complicated and checuser info is getting lost in the colossal workshop. Per the request of arbcom the issue is now in front of WP:SSP at which I would like to be able to link to a clean checkuser case.
It may be best to let Dmcdevit process this.
-- Cat chi? 17:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 12:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC) |
Although both users are probably too old to check, their checkuser data should have been preserved after the RfArs. Although I feel the user is borderlining disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits with less than 100 "professional" edits, a consensus was not reached to this end: Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard#Diyarbakir and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Diyarbakir.
Additional evidence:
Overall the user made no edits on wikipedia/wikipedia talk name space that isn't 'concerning me' (his edits came after mine) even though he demonstrates he knows how to get around with his 10th edit. User made no edits on category namespace that are not contradicting my edits. He may have completely opposite views, this shouldn't prevent him in making edits that are not contradicting my edits specifically. Individually most/all these edits are sane but collectively I feel they fall under WP:HA which would follow the edit pattern of User:Moby Dick.
I suspect a Moby Dick sockpuppet more but it could also be Xebat or half a dozen other such banned/disruptive users.
-- Cat chi? 12:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Since a checkuser for Davenbelle is not possible (as davenbelle last edited on early december) and as per the evidence at WP:ANB/I#Sock_investigation I'd like to request a CheckUser to establish weather or not Moby Dick is editing from a +8 UTC country or better if from bali (assuming this does not violate privacy issues). Thanks. Cat out 07:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Checkuser is not for fishing. See above: You must lay out clearly the evidence for sockpuppetry. You must explain how your request fits the policy above. Checkuser is not used to confirm "gut feelings" or curiosity; it is only used for cases where there is strong evidence of a connection and a serious matter of policy violation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Essjay ( talk • contribs) .
A detailed evidence is avalible at: [2]
There is an arbitration case involving this user which states that he was stalking me: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Coolcat,_Davenbelle_and_Stereotek -- Cat out 19:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Inconclusive; Davenbelle hasn't edited in months, there are no records to compare. Essjay ( Talk • Connect) 05:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Edits of User:80.202.25.17 show striking resemblance with User:80.203.115.12 as well as User:Davenbelle see: [3]. I suspect him of being davenbelle logged off paceing up his stalking campaign slowly although NOTHING remotely colse to what I am used to. It may also be a genuine edit, I just want to rule it out. -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 22:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 17:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC) |
While I am aware of the result ( [1]) of this case. The case got rather complicated and checuser info is getting lost in the colossal workshop. Per the request of arbcom the issue is now in front of WP:SSP at which I would like to be able to link to a clean checkuser case.
It may be best to let Dmcdevit process this.
-- Cat chi? 17:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 12:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC) |
Although both users are probably too old to check, their checkuser data should have been preserved after the RfArs. Although I feel the user is borderlining disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits with less than 100 "professional" edits, a consensus was not reached to this end: Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard#Diyarbakir and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Diyarbakir.
Additional evidence:
Overall the user made no edits on wikipedia/wikipedia talk name space that isn't 'concerning me' (his edits came after mine) even though he demonstrates he knows how to get around with his 10th edit. User made no edits on category namespace that are not contradicting my edits. He may have completely opposite views, this shouldn't prevent him in making edits that are not contradicting my edits specifically. Individually most/all these edits are sane but collectively I feel they fall under WP:HA which would follow the edit pattern of User:Moby Dick.
I suspect a Moby Dick sockpuppet more but it could also be Xebat or half a dozen other such banned/disruptive users.
-- Cat chi? 12:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Since a checkuser for Davenbelle is not possible (as davenbelle last edited on early december) and as per the evidence at WP:ANB/I#Sock_investigation I'd like to request a CheckUser to establish weather or not Moby Dick is editing from a +8 UTC country or better if from bali (assuming this does not violate privacy issues). Thanks. Cat out 07:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Checkuser is not for fishing. See above: You must lay out clearly the evidence for sockpuppetry. You must explain how your request fits the policy above. Checkuser is not used to confirm "gut feelings" or curiosity; it is only used for cases where there is strong evidence of a connection and a serious matter of policy violation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Essjay ( talk • contribs) .
A detailed evidence is avalible at: [2]
There is an arbitration case involving this user which states that he was stalking me: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Coolcat,_Davenbelle_and_Stereotek -- Cat out 19:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Inconclusive; Davenbelle hasn't edited in months, there are no records to compare. Essjay ( Talk • Connect) 05:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Edits of User:80.202.25.17 show striking resemblance with User:80.203.115.12 as well as User:Davenbelle see: [3]. I suspect him of being davenbelle logged off paceing up his stalking campaign slowly although NOTHING remotely colse to what I am used to. It may also be a genuine edit, I just want to rule it out. -- Cool Cat Talk| @ 22:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)