request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 9 December 2008 |
Submitted by Kingturtle ( talk) 19:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 November 2008 |
Submitted by Kingturtle ( talk) 02:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC) |
this edit is the same as the ones done by User:PashtoonEditor [1] [2], who was indef-blocked as a sock of Beh-nam.
User:Ikearode per WP:DUCK, this edit is the same as above
Some of them could be socks of User:NisarKand -- Enric Naval ( talk) 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 14 July 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 7 July 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 27 June 2008 |
Kingturtle ( talk) 17:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 26 May 2008 |
Has been restoring edits Beh-nam made using IP's. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 26 May 2008 |
Blueboy 96 03:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 17 May 2008 |
Kingturtle ( talk) 05:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Clerk note: blocked by KT. —
Rlevse •
Talk •
01:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 May 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 08:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC) |
CyrusTheGreat2 started an editwar on Afghanistan and made the same types of edits as multiply sockpupping and banned user Beh-nam. henrik• talk 08:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
Beh-nam is a banned user. It looks pretty obvious like this is a sock, but I wanted to make sure. -- B ( talk) 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Also, at Nasrat Parsa, Anoshirawan had an edit war with User:Historian born 1975, a puppet of User:NisarKand.
I've run out of time today to do anymore research on this. Kingturtle ( talk) 14:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by EduardoGuerez ( talk • contribs)
P.S. Is there any way we can strengthen the ban on Beh-nam? Kingturtle ( talk) 22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC) P.P.S. I have blocked DoctorLeeOnWiki temporarily for edit warring. Kingturtle ( talk) 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Confirmed Rather pointless to keep posting checks, almost, since you keep spotting them so fast. We can try a rangeblock but it may be impractical for various reasons.
Thatcher
22:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
It's a pain posting each puppet to this request page, but don't feel right infinite-banning sockpuppets without a checkuser confirmation. By the way, thank you for acting so quickly on this. Kingturtle ( talk) 23:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
This and is using the IP to make the same edit like This. Momusufan ( talk) 23:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 11 March 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 10 March 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 29 February 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 21 February 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 01:10, 19 February 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
Banned editor and anti-Afghan User:Beh-nam is now using the new sock accounts for edti-wars and violate many rules of Wikipedia. This distruptive user claims to be an ethnic Tajik and he is easily spotted because he shows the same ill feelings towards other ethnic groups by his messages or edits and is constantly pushing for Persian POVs in every article. He is labelling Pashtun cities as "gay cities" [46], with clear intentions. [47] He is currently eyeing on these articles: Ahmad Shah Durrani, Hotaki dynasty, Kandahar, Kabul and probably other Pashtun people related articles because it appears that he has a natural hate towards these people. I don't think haters such as him should be allowed to edit articles, especially articles relating to their rivals or opponents.-- 203.175.65.153 ( talk) 05:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 03:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC) |
The banned editor Beh-nam is using these new sock accounts to vandalise Afghanistan related articles. If you quickly look down the list here ---> [48], you'll see that mostly all of the above listed socks are used by the same person which starts with "Beh-nam" and ends with his latest sock "Hazara898". He is best known for his similar edit-warring with Pashtuns and Turks, relating to ethnic issues. His favorite articles to vandalise are Afghanistan and Pashtun people.-- 203.175.65.169 ( talk) 15:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Both of these users are involved in same edit-war on the same articles, with same POVs. Beh-nam admitted that he knows user:Anoshirawan and deleted the suspected sockpuppet tag from Anoshirawan's front page. [49] I placed the tag there when Anoshirawan was not online, so how did Beh-nam knew I placed the tag there? If you look at both of the users' history, you will see that both are upto no good, disrupting and creating edit-war with other editors. They or the same person uses both names as a tag team so he doesn't violate the 3RR rule. These users are also vandalizing articles, by removing well sourced information and no administrator will stop them. for example, changing the internationally recognized name "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" in every article, after many people showed enough evidence that the only correct way to spell the name was "Afghan". They changed the article "Afghan American" to "Afghanistani American", which is incorrect according to Afghanistan's constitution, CIA Factbook, Webster's Dicitionary, and every other dictionary or book in the world. These users simply say that "Afghanistani" sounds better and should be used. These users or user has hijacked all Afghanistan related articles and are destroying them in front of our eyes but no administrator will do anything to even warn them. Rabeenaz 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 9 December 2008 |
Submitted by Kingturtle ( talk) 19:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 November 2008 |
Submitted by Kingturtle ( talk) 02:03, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC) |
this edit is the same as the ones done by User:PashtoonEditor [1] [2], who was indef-blocked as a sock of Beh-nam.
User:Ikearode per WP:DUCK, this edit is the same as above
Some of them could be socks of User:NisarKand -- Enric Naval ( talk) 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 14 July 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 7 July 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 27 June 2008 |
Kingturtle ( talk) 17:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 26 May 2008 |
Has been restoring edits Beh-nam made using IP's. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 26 May 2008 |
Blueboy 96 03:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 17 May 2008 |
Kingturtle ( talk) 05:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Clerk note: blocked by KT. —
Rlevse •
Talk •
01:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 May 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 08:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC) |
CyrusTheGreat2 started an editwar on Afghanistan and made the same types of edits as multiply sockpupping and banned user Beh-nam. henrik• talk 08:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC) |
Beh-nam is a banned user. It looks pretty obvious like this is a sock, but I wanted to make sure. -- B ( talk) 00:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Also, at Nasrat Parsa, Anoshirawan had an edit war with User:Historian born 1975, a puppet of User:NisarKand.
I've run out of time today to do anymore research on this. Kingturtle ( talk) 14:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by EduardoGuerez ( talk • contribs)
P.S. Is there any way we can strengthen the ban on Beh-nam? Kingturtle ( talk) 22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC) P.P.S. I have blocked DoctorLeeOnWiki temporarily for edit warring. Kingturtle ( talk) 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Confirmed Rather pointless to keep posting checks, almost, since you keep spotting them so fast. We can try a rangeblock but it may be impractical for various reasons.
Thatcher
22:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
It's a pain posting each puppet to this request page, but don't feel right infinite-banning sockpuppets without a checkuser confirmation. By the way, thank you for acting so quickly on this. Kingturtle ( talk) 23:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
This and is using the IP to make the same edit like This. Momusufan ( talk) 23:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 11 March 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 10 March 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 29 February 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 21 February 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 01:10, 19 February 2008 |
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
Banned editor and anti-Afghan User:Beh-nam is now using the new sock accounts for edti-wars and violate many rules of Wikipedia. This distruptive user claims to be an ethnic Tajik and he is easily spotted because he shows the same ill feelings towards other ethnic groups by his messages or edits and is constantly pushing for Persian POVs in every article. He is labelling Pashtun cities as "gay cities" [46], with clear intentions. [47] He is currently eyeing on these articles: Ahmad Shah Durrani, Hotaki dynasty, Kandahar, Kabul and probably other Pashtun people related articles because it appears that he has a natural hate towards these people. I don't think haters such as him should be allowed to edit articles, especially articles relating to their rivals or opponents.-- 203.175.65.153 ( talk) 05:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 03:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC) |
The banned editor Beh-nam is using these new sock accounts to vandalise Afghanistan related articles. If you quickly look down the list here ---> [48], you'll see that mostly all of the above listed socks are used by the same person which starts with "Beh-nam" and ends with his latest sock "Hazara898". He is best known for his similar edit-warring with Pashtuns and Turks, relating to ethnic issues. His favorite articles to vandalise are Afghanistan and Pashtun people.-- 203.175.65.169 ( talk) 15:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Both of these users are involved in same edit-war on the same articles, with same POVs. Beh-nam admitted that he knows user:Anoshirawan and deleted the suspected sockpuppet tag from Anoshirawan's front page. [49] I placed the tag there when Anoshirawan was not online, so how did Beh-nam knew I placed the tag there? If you look at both of the users' history, you will see that both are upto no good, disrupting and creating edit-war with other editors. They or the same person uses both names as a tag team so he doesn't violate the 3RR rule. These users are also vandalizing articles, by removing well sourced information and no administrator will stop them. for example, changing the internationally recognized name "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" in every article, after many people showed enough evidence that the only correct way to spell the name was "Afghan". They changed the article "Afghan American" to "Afghanistani American", which is incorrect according to Afghanistan's constitution, CIA Factbook, Webster's Dicitionary, and every other dictionary or book in the world. These users simply say that "Afghanistani" sounds better and should be used. These users or user has hijacked all Afghanistan related articles and are destroying them in front of our eyes but no administrator will do anything to even warn them. Rabeenaz 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)