Avraham
- Avraham ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheActuary ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
While the clerks here believe that my request was not eligiblie for a checkuser, the alleged main sock puppeteer user:SkipSmith, has accused user:TheActuary of being a sock puppet of myself; see here http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:TheActuary&diff=prev&oldid=65521605 . I know who TheActuary is, so I know that is rediculous, but I would like it to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Is that a proper use of checkuser? Further, would this turn of events allow for the reopening of my case? Thank you. -- Avi 12:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Declined The clerks are broadly right. There's been no evidence presented so there are no grounds to run a check. He's welcome to bring those allegations here, of course.
Mackensen
(talk) 21:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Very well, as you wish. -- Avi 21:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- (See related case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith.) Thatcher131 22:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Avi 21:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Regarding retaliatory allegations, please see here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Avraham. I will tag all of the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith, with perhaps the exception of the last IP, with sockpuppet tags eventually, but if this changes your mind about the case, and especially if it means you would check Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith, I would appreciate it. But I understand that proper protocol must be followed. Thank you. -- Avi 13:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- As a note, this has taken a turn for the worse, as I feel that I have been libeled, or almost libeled, by Skipsmith here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%3ASuspected_sock_puppets%2FSkipSmith&diff=65792979&oldid=65760867 -- Avi 17:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Avraham
- Avraham ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheActuary ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
While the clerks here believe that my request was not eligiblie for a checkuser, the alleged main sock puppeteer user:SkipSmith, has accused user:TheActuary of being a sock puppet of myself; see here http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:TheActuary&diff=prev&oldid=65521605 . I know who TheActuary is, so I know that is rediculous, but I would like it to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Is that a proper use of checkuser? Further, would this turn of events allow for the reopening of my case? Thank you. -- Avi 12:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Declined The clerks are broadly right. There's been no evidence presented so there are no grounds to run a check. He's welcome to bring those allegations here, of course.
Mackensen
(talk) 21:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Very well, as you wish. -- Avi 21:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- (See related case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith.) Thatcher131 22:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Avi 21:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Regarding retaliatory allegations, please see here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Avraham. I will tag all of the Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith, with perhaps the exception of the last IP, with sockpuppet tags eventually, but if this changes your mind about the case, and especially if it means you would check Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Skipsmith, I would appreciate it. But I understand that proper protocol must be followed. Thank you. -- Avi 13:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- As a note, this has taken a turn for the worse, as I feel that I have been libeled, or almost libeled, by Skipsmith here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%3ASuspected_sock_puppets%2FSkipSmith&diff=65792979&oldid=65760867 -- Avi 17:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.