If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ashill}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Supporting evidence: On the
Solar System talk page the three users seem to fit into three grades.
Ashill is the most reasonable and verbose
Serendipodous does little but nay-say things, and doesn't offer counter-arguments, or offers simple support statements. Counter arguments which are offered have stupid points.
Ckatz has made one contribution to the talk page
from this point forward, but imposes the "consensus" view of the other two, when the discussion hasn't conclude and logical points remain unchallenged. Ashill then concretely supports Ckatz's edits when he had previously shown some flexibility.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ashill}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Supporting evidence: On the
Solar System talk page the three users seem to fit into three grades.
Ashill is the most reasonable and verbose
Serendipodous does little but nay-say things, and doesn't offer counter-arguments, or offers simple support statements. Counter arguments which are offered have stupid points.
Ckatz has made one contribution to the talk page
from this point forward, but imposes the "consensus" view of the other two, when the discussion hasn't conclude and logical points remain unchallenged. Ashill then concretely supports Ckatz's edits when he had previously shown some flexibility.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.