request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
All fo the users are single purpose accounts editing within the Fitna article.All share identical editing styles, all are abusive and disruptive. Requests for civility have been ignored in precisely the same way. All the accounts pointedly don't use a sig so as to avoid detection all the better. Lastly, each one of the socks supposedly represent new accounts, and yet the account holder is very well-versed in using wiki policies, implying a level of familiarity incongruent with a newbie. I suspect a budding sockfarm. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 14:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
♠ I am the single anonymous user. My posts all begin with ♠. Arcayne is Forum Shopping due to an action being taken against him by another member on Wikiquette. I'll suggest that due to my CLAIMING these posts AND the fact that NO OTHER editor believes me to be more than a SINGLE editor that this is merely vindictive. 75.57.165.180 ( talk) 14:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
♠Neutral posts informing editors you've interacted with in the last week roughly have been openly discussed here: [1] and on your personal Talk page. Your formal accusation of me to be engaging in "Ongoing, serious pattern vandalism involving dozens of incidents" and "3RR violation using socks". is an abuse of wiki and is Forum Shopping. There were no 3RR incidents, it was at the time a semi-protected article and I, a public editor, was locked out - and further NO incidents of Vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.165.180 ( talk • contribs)
♠*I will further defend myself against the false accusation of sockpuppetry by quoting you:
- Every other one of the likely socks of the anon show similarly abusive editing patterns, and all use the '♠' as an identifier.
I not only use a distinct identifier - I have a unique voice and refer frequently to my previous writings. This is clearly NOT sockpuppetry, it is an absurd accusation. I claim my posts. 75.57.165.180 ( talk) 06:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I have just removed the sock tags added to the IP talk pages by Seicer. Any particular reason why the tags were still there? Avb 00:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 14:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC) |
All fo the users are single purpose accounts editing within the Fitna article.All share identical editing styles, all are abusive and disruptive. Requests for civility have been ignored in precisely the same way. All the accounts pointedly don't use a sig so as to avoid detection all the better. Lastly, each one of the socks supposedly represent new accounts, and yet the account holder is very well-versed in using wiki policies, implying a level of familiarity incongruent with a newbie. I suspect a budding sockfarm. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 14:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
♠ I am the single anonymous user. My posts all begin with ♠. Arcayne is Forum Shopping due to an action being taken against him by another member on Wikiquette. I'll suggest that due to my CLAIMING these posts AND the fact that NO OTHER editor believes me to be more than a SINGLE editor that this is merely vindictive. 75.57.165.180 ( talk) 14:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
♠Neutral posts informing editors you've interacted with in the last week roughly have been openly discussed here: [1] and on your personal Talk page. Your formal accusation of me to be engaging in "Ongoing, serious pattern vandalism involving dozens of incidents" and "3RR violation using socks". is an abuse of wiki and is Forum Shopping. There were no 3RR incidents, it was at the time a semi-protected article and I, a public editor, was locked out - and further NO incidents of Vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.165.180 ( talk • contribs)
♠*I will further defend myself against the false accusation of sockpuppetry by quoting you:
- Every other one of the likely socks of the anon show similarly abusive editing patterns, and all use the '♠' as an identifier.
I not only use a distinct identifier - I have a unique voice and refer frequently to my previous writings. This is clearly NOT sockpuppetry, it is an absurd accusation. I claim my posts. 75.57.165.180 ( talk) 06:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I have just removed the sock tags added to the IP talk pages by Seicer. Any particular reason why the tags were still there? Avb 00:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)