all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, zero (0) Arbitrators are recused and three (3) are inactive, so six (6) votes are a majority.
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Place those on the discussion page.
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.
Given that this is generally a content matter and the dispute seems to have died down in recent weeks, I move to close. Neutrality talk 22:54, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose
all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, zero (0) Arbitrators are recused and three (3) are inactive, so six (6) votes are a majority.
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Place those on the discussion page.
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.
Given that this is generally a content matter and the dispute seems to have died down in recent weeks, I move to close. Neutrality talk 22:54, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose