all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or vote to abstain.
Conditional votes for, against, or to abstain should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.
Enacted 1) Gzornenplatz and VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with German or Polish subjects whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorised to enact 24 hour blocks for violations of this.
1.5) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, and VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with German or Polish subjects whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorised to enact short blocks for violations of this, up to one week in length.
Enacted 2) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, Kevin Baas, and VeryVerily are banned from reverting any article more than twice in one 24 hour period whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops are hereby authorised to enact 24 blocks for violations of this.
Enacted
3)
Shorne and
VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with the Cold War or communism whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorized to enact 24 hour blocks for violations of this.
4) {text of proposed orders}
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) Contributors are expected to obey Wikipedia policies, including the three revert rule.
2) When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum.
3) When reverting, users are expected to give their reasons in the edit summaries.
4) When disputing the accuracy or neutrality of an article, users are always expected to give a reason on the article's talk page.
5) Editors are expected to be cooperative with other users and to assume good faith on the part of others.
6)
Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
7) Although discussion is always encouraged, the Arbitration Committee does not expect users to compromise in all circumtances; doing so would serve only to support cranks and POV pushers.
8) In cases where compromise cannot be reached, users are expected to follow the
Dispute resolution process.
8.1) In cases where compromise cannot be reached, users are expected to follow the later stages in the
dispute resolution process.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, and VeryVerily have all violated the three revert rule on numerous occasions during numerous disputes. Kevin Baas has as well, but not nearly to the extent of the others. Gzornenplatz refused to follow it even after being asked by Jimbo himself.
2) During many of those disputes, Gzornenplatz, Shorne, Ruy Lopez, and especially VeryVerily made no attempt at a dialogue.
Random sampling of non-use of talk page:
3) On November 7, Gzornenplatz began disputing dozens of articles written by JohnArmagh with no reason given. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) For repeated violation of the three revert rule, VeryVerily and Shorne, and Gzornenplatz are banned for two months.
2) For failing to discuss reverts, Shorne, Ruy Lopenz, and Gzornenplatz are banned for one week; VeryVerily for two weeks.
3) For making personal attacks on Arbitration pages and trying to disrupt the process of Arbitration, Shorne is banned for one week.
4) VeryVerily, Shorne, and Gzornenplatz are hereby limited to one revert per page per day (this includes any page editable on the English Wikipedia).
5) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, and VeryVerily, and Ruy Lopez are required to discuss all reverts on the relavant talk page, with the goal of finding mutually acceptable compromises.
6) For violating the three revert rule at least twice, Kevin Baas is banned for 2 days.
7) If Gzornenplatz, VeryVerily, or Shorne can demonstrate good behavior (abiding by wikipedia policies and generally sociable editing habits), in 6 months, they may each request that the Arbitration Committee reduce or lift the revert parole against them.
8) For repeated violations of the three revert rule, VeryVerily and Shorne and Gzornenplatz are placed on a 3 month general probation. If during this period they violate the other remedies passed in this case, then they can, at the discretion of the Committee, be ordered to serve the rest of their probation period banned from editing the English Wikipedia.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) If Gzornenplatz, Shorne, or VeryVerily should revert a page more than once per day, an administrator may ban him for up to 24 hours.
2) If Gzornenplatz, Shorne, or VeryVerily should revert a page without discussing it on the relevant talk page, an administrator may ban him for up to 24 hours.
Since Ruy Lopez was intimately involved in these matters, I'd suggest adding him to the case as well. →Raul654 04:18, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
Also, on a side note, I'd like to say I find this edit particularly disturbing. →Raul654 08:34, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
Four Aye votes needed to close case
Since there's been no action here in quite a while, and since everything except the last finding of fact (That Gzornenplatz began disputing a lot of articles) and the last two remedies have the necessary votes, I move to close. →Raul654 01:31, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or vote to abstain.
Conditional votes for, against, or to abstain should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.
Enacted 1) Gzornenplatz and VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with German or Polish subjects whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorised to enact 24 hour blocks for violations of this.
1.5) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, and VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with German or Polish subjects whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorised to enact short blocks for violations of this, up to one week in length.
Enacted 2) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, Kevin Baas, and VeryVerily are banned from reverting any article more than twice in one 24 hour period whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops are hereby authorised to enact 24 blocks for violations of this.
Enacted
3)
Shorne and
VeryVerily are banned from editing any article having to do with the Cold War or communism whilst Arbitration is on-going. Sysops may use their discretion in determining what falls into these areas, and are hereby authorized to enact 24 hour blocks for violations of this.
4) {text of proposed orders}
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) Contributors are expected to obey Wikipedia policies, including the three revert rule.
2) When disagreements arise, users are expected to discuss their differences rationally rather than reverting ad infinitum.
3) When reverting, users are expected to give their reasons in the edit summaries.
4) When disputing the accuracy or neutrality of an article, users are always expected to give a reason on the article's talk page.
5) Editors are expected to be cooperative with other users and to assume good faith on the part of others.
6)
Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
7) Although discussion is always encouraged, the Arbitration Committee does not expect users to compromise in all circumtances; doing so would serve only to support cranks and POV pushers.
8) In cases where compromise cannot be reached, users are expected to follow the
Dispute resolution process.
8.1) In cases where compromise cannot be reached, users are expected to follow the later stages in the
dispute resolution process.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, and VeryVerily have all violated the three revert rule on numerous occasions during numerous disputes. Kevin Baas has as well, but not nearly to the extent of the others. Gzornenplatz refused to follow it even after being asked by Jimbo himself.
2) During many of those disputes, Gzornenplatz, Shorne, Ruy Lopez, and especially VeryVerily made no attempt at a dialogue.
Random sampling of non-use of talk page:
3) On November 7, Gzornenplatz began disputing dozens of articles written by JohnArmagh with no reason given. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) For repeated violation of the three revert rule, VeryVerily and Shorne, and Gzornenplatz are banned for two months.
2) For failing to discuss reverts, Shorne, Ruy Lopenz, and Gzornenplatz are banned for one week; VeryVerily for two weeks.
3) For making personal attacks on Arbitration pages and trying to disrupt the process of Arbitration, Shorne is banned for one week.
4) VeryVerily, Shorne, and Gzornenplatz are hereby limited to one revert per page per day (this includes any page editable on the English Wikipedia).
5) Gzornenplatz, Shorne, and VeryVerily, and Ruy Lopez are required to discuss all reverts on the relavant talk page, with the goal of finding mutually acceptable compromises.
6) For violating the three revert rule at least twice, Kevin Baas is banned for 2 days.
7) If Gzornenplatz, VeryVerily, or Shorne can demonstrate good behavior (abiding by wikipedia policies and generally sociable editing habits), in 6 months, they may each request that the Arbitration Committee reduce or lift the revert parole against them.
8) For repeated violations of the three revert rule, VeryVerily and Shorne and Gzornenplatz are placed on a 3 month general probation. If during this period they violate the other remedies passed in this case, then they can, at the discretion of the Committee, be ordered to serve the rest of their probation period banned from editing the English Wikipedia.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) If Gzornenplatz, Shorne, or VeryVerily should revert a page more than once per day, an administrator may ban him for up to 24 hours.
2) If Gzornenplatz, Shorne, or VeryVerily should revert a page without discussing it on the relevant talk page, an administrator may ban him for up to 24 hours.
Since Ruy Lopez was intimately involved in these matters, I'd suggest adding him to the case as well. →Raul654 04:18, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
Also, on a side note, I'd like to say I find this edit particularly disturbing. →Raul654 08:34, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
Four Aye votes needed to close case
Since there's been no action here in quite a while, and since everything except the last finding of fact (That Gzornenplatz began disputing a lot of articles) and the last two remedies have the necessary votes, I move to close. →Raul654 01:31, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)