all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.
1) {text of proposed orders}
Enacted 1) Pending a final decision in this matter CheeseDreams is banned from editing all articles which relate to Christianity. This ban is based on aggressive POV editwarring as illustrated by the edit history of Historicity_of_Jesus.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) Certain customary practices used on Wikipedia are not written down, but can be ascertained by communication with other users.
2) It is the practice on Wikipedia when a talk page becomes too long for convenient editing to move older material to archives linked from the main page.
3) Talk pages may be refactored in order to improve their usability, brief, unbiased summaries of past discussion may be useful, especially for new editors, see Wikipedia:Refactoring.
4) Wikipedia users are required to avoid personal attacks.
5) Wikipedia editors may not revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period. This rule is based on individual users, not on a group of users who are reverting the same material (CheeseDream's "tag team" concept).
6) Users who modify other user's edits of arbitration pages, inserting peripheral material, and especially deleting them or portions of them will be heavily penalized.
7) Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) A major issue in this matter is the attempt of CheeseDreams to insert language which relates to Koan, generally considered a Zen Buddhist teaching method, into the Jesus article [1].
2) A google search for "jesus", "koan" and "new testament" returns a little over a thousand hits, including the customer reviews of The Zen Teachings of Jesus at the top.
3) CheeseDreams has on Talk:Cultural_and_historical_background_of_Jesus repeatedly inserted lengthy summaries of prior material from the talk page archive [2] despite strenuous objections of other editors involved in the article.
4) CheeseDreams has made personal attacks on other users [3].
5) CheeseDreams also edits under the username User:Cheesedreams and under the IP 81.156.93.151.
6) Ta bu shi da yu has modified an edit in Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/CheeseDreams by CheeseDreams to insert a portion of his complaint, see [4]
7) CheeseDreams removed a request for a temporary injunction in this matter from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams [5]
8)CheeseDreams vandalized User:Ta bu shi da yu by adding several dispute tags. [6]
9) CheeseDreams has acted in a way to cause disruption, either to make a point or to force through her preferences. This includes tagging over large numbers of pages with dispute notices [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] without discussion; and recreating disputed pages under new titles ( Cultural and historical background of Jesus recreated as Jesus in a cultural and historical background and Historical reconstruction of the sort of person Jesus would be).
10) CheeseDreams has acted in such as way as to cause disruption in an attempt to derail the arbitration process. This includes making a survey page calling for an arbitrators resignation, and making accusations of personal attacks. [12]
11) The above difficulties have centred on articles relating to Christianity or issues arising from disputes that started on articles relating to Christianity.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) Ta bu shi da yu is banned for 30 days for modifying material (the signature) inserted by CheeseDreams in Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/CheeseDreams, see bottom of edit "P.s. could someone look into blocking all of these sock puppets so that we can find out who they really are?"
2) CheeseDreams is banned for 90 days for removing a request for a temporary injunction in this matter from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams [17]
3) For repeatedly filing frivolous Requests for Comment, Cheesedreams is prohibited from filing any RFCs in the future.
3.1) For repeatedly filing frivolous Requests for Comment, the number of RFCs open that were started by CheeseDreams is limited to one unless it is demonstrated to an administrator that there is a serious need for the RFC.
4) For tagging over 50 articles with disupte headings [and other disruptive actions], CheeseDreams is banned for one week.
5) For vandalizing User:Ta bu shi da yu ( [18]), CheeseDreams is banned for 1 day.
6) For attempting to disrupt the arbitration process (in the form of filing RFCs against arbitrators, making accusations of personal attacks, etc) CheeseDreams is banned for 1 week.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) RFCs filed by Cheesedreams in excess of 3.1 above may be removed at discretion by an administrator if it is percieved that there is not a serious need for the RFC, provided that that administrator is not personally involved
2) Cheesedreams may not recreate any page after it has been deleted. Should she do so, any administrator may block Cheesedreams up until and including one month. (withdrawn --
Neutrality
talk)
2) Cheesedreams may not recreate any page after it has been deleted. Should she do so, any administrator may block Cheesedreams up until and including one week.
3) CheeseDreams may not revert any page more than twice in any 24-hour period, except for simple vandalism. Should he do so, any administrator may block him for a length of time up onto and including 24 hours, with the block length doubling for each violation. Administrators are authorized to determine what constitutes a reversion at their discretion.
3bis) Cheesedreams is banned from editing all Jesus-related articles for the period of one year. Administrators are given discretion in determining what articles are "Jesus-related" and may enact blocks of up to one week for each edit. This does not apply to talk pages [but does apply to templates used in, or designed for use in, Jesus-related articles] (addition suggested by sannse). Neutrality talk 06:06, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
4) Cheesedreams is banned from editing all Christianity-related articles for the period of one year. Administrators are given discretion in determining what articles are "Christianity-related" and may enact blocks of up to one week for each edit. This does not apply to talk pages [but does apply to templates used in, or designed for use in, Christianity-related articles] (addition suggested by sannse) Neutrality talk 06:06, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
5) If Cheesedreams can demonstrate a pattern of editing with civility, and without serious conflict, for the next six months, she can apply for a lifting of the above ban on editing Christianity related articles.
Four Aye votes needed to close case
all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.
1) {text of proposed orders}
Enacted 1) Pending a final decision in this matter CheeseDreams is banned from editing all articles which relate to Christianity. This ban is based on aggressive POV editwarring as illustrated by the edit history of Historicity_of_Jesus.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) Certain customary practices used on Wikipedia are not written down, but can be ascertained by communication with other users.
2) It is the practice on Wikipedia when a talk page becomes too long for convenient editing to move older material to archives linked from the main page.
3) Talk pages may be refactored in order to improve their usability, brief, unbiased summaries of past discussion may be useful, especially for new editors, see Wikipedia:Refactoring.
4) Wikipedia users are required to avoid personal attacks.
5) Wikipedia editors may not revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period. This rule is based on individual users, not on a group of users who are reverting the same material (CheeseDream's "tag team" concept).
6) Users who modify other user's edits of arbitration pages, inserting peripheral material, and especially deleting them or portions of them will be heavily penalized.
7) Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) A major issue in this matter is the attempt of CheeseDreams to insert language which relates to Koan, generally considered a Zen Buddhist teaching method, into the Jesus article [1].
2) A google search for "jesus", "koan" and "new testament" returns a little over a thousand hits, including the customer reviews of The Zen Teachings of Jesus at the top.
3) CheeseDreams has on Talk:Cultural_and_historical_background_of_Jesus repeatedly inserted lengthy summaries of prior material from the talk page archive [2] despite strenuous objections of other editors involved in the article.
4) CheeseDreams has made personal attacks on other users [3].
5) CheeseDreams also edits under the username User:Cheesedreams and under the IP 81.156.93.151.
6) Ta bu shi da yu has modified an edit in Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/CheeseDreams by CheeseDreams to insert a portion of his complaint, see [4]
7) CheeseDreams removed a request for a temporary injunction in this matter from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams [5]
8)CheeseDreams vandalized User:Ta bu shi da yu by adding several dispute tags. [6]
9) CheeseDreams has acted in a way to cause disruption, either to make a point or to force through her preferences. This includes tagging over large numbers of pages with dispute notices [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] without discussion; and recreating disputed pages under new titles ( Cultural and historical background of Jesus recreated as Jesus in a cultural and historical background and Historical reconstruction of the sort of person Jesus would be).
10) CheeseDreams has acted in such as way as to cause disruption in an attempt to derail the arbitration process. This includes making a survey page calling for an arbitrators resignation, and making accusations of personal attacks. [12]
11) The above difficulties have centred on articles relating to Christianity or issues arising from disputes that started on articles relating to Christianity.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) Ta bu shi da yu is banned for 30 days for modifying material (the signature) inserted by CheeseDreams in Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/CheeseDreams, see bottom of edit "P.s. could someone look into blocking all of these sock puppets so that we can find out who they really are?"
2) CheeseDreams is banned for 90 days for removing a request for a temporary injunction in this matter from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams [17]
3) For repeatedly filing frivolous Requests for Comment, Cheesedreams is prohibited from filing any RFCs in the future.
3.1) For repeatedly filing frivolous Requests for Comment, the number of RFCs open that were started by CheeseDreams is limited to one unless it is demonstrated to an administrator that there is a serious need for the RFC.
4) For tagging over 50 articles with disupte headings [and other disruptive actions], CheeseDreams is banned for one week.
5) For vandalizing User:Ta bu shi da yu ( [18]), CheeseDreams is banned for 1 day.
6) For attempting to disrupt the arbitration process (in the form of filing RFCs against arbitrators, making accusations of personal attacks, etc) CheeseDreams is banned for 1 week.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) RFCs filed by Cheesedreams in excess of 3.1 above may be removed at discretion by an administrator if it is percieved that there is not a serious need for the RFC, provided that that administrator is not personally involved
2) Cheesedreams may not recreate any page after it has been deleted. Should she do so, any administrator may block Cheesedreams up until and including one month. (withdrawn --
Neutrality
talk)
2) Cheesedreams may not recreate any page after it has been deleted. Should she do so, any administrator may block Cheesedreams up until and including one week.
3) CheeseDreams may not revert any page more than twice in any 24-hour period, except for simple vandalism. Should he do so, any administrator may block him for a length of time up onto and including 24 hours, with the block length doubling for each violation. Administrators are authorized to determine what constitutes a reversion at their discretion.
3bis) Cheesedreams is banned from editing all Jesus-related articles for the period of one year. Administrators are given discretion in determining what articles are "Jesus-related" and may enact blocks of up to one week for each edit. This does not apply to talk pages [but does apply to templates used in, or designed for use in, Jesus-related articles] (addition suggested by sannse). Neutrality talk 06:06, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
4) Cheesedreams is banned from editing all Christianity-related articles for the period of one year. Administrators are given discretion in determining what articles are "Christianity-related" and may enact blocks of up to one week for each edit. This does not apply to talk pages [but does apply to templates used in, or designed for use in, Christianity-related articles] (addition suggested by sannse) Neutrality talk 06:06, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
5) If Cheesedreams can demonstrate a pattern of editing with civility, and without serious conflict, for the next six months, she can apply for a lifting of the above ban on editing Christianity related articles.
Four Aye votes needed to close case