This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators may edit, for voting.
1) Do not allow any comments on the discussion page from anonymous users in Catalonia and Valencian Community
From my point of view this proposal will decrease the use of ad hominem arguments and personal attacks in the discussion page of Valencian Community and Catalonia that apart from Maurice are usually made by anonymous contributors.-- GillesV 03:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
2) See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Evidence
3)
1)
2)
3)
4)
1) {text of proposed principle}
2) {text of proposed principle}
3) {text of proposed principle}
4) {text of proposed principle}
5) {text of proposed principle}
6) {text of proposed principle}
7) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
2) {text of proposed remedy}
3) {text of proposed remedy}
4) {text of proposed remedy}
5) {text of proposed remedy}
6) {text of proposed remedy}
7) {text of proposed remedy}
8) {text of proposed remedy}
9) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
3) {text of proposed enforcement}
4) {text of proposed enforcement}
5) {text of proposed enforcement}
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators may edit, for voting.
1) Do not allow any comments on the discussion page from anonymous users in Catalonia and Valencian Community
From my point of view this proposal will decrease the use of ad hominem arguments and personal attacks in the discussion page of Valencian Community and Catalonia that apart from Maurice are usually made by anonymous contributors.-- GillesV 03:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
2) See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Evidence
3)
1)
2)
3)
4)
1) {text of proposed principle}
2) {text of proposed principle}
3) {text of proposed principle}
4) {text of proposed principle}
5) {text of proposed principle}
6) {text of proposed principle}
7) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
2) {text of proposed remedy}
3) {text of proposed remedy}
4) {text of proposed remedy}
5) {text of proposed remedy}
6) {text of proposed remedy}
7) {text of proposed remedy}
8) {text of proposed remedy}
9) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
3) {text of proposed enforcement}
4) {text of proposed enforcement}
5) {text of proposed enforcement}
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis