mtmdem (
talk·contribs) – With a depth of knowledge in various issues, including the world government, politics, and history, I have a lot to contribute. Since most high-profile articles fall into this category, I can keep a close eye out for vandals and keep Wikipedia fair and accurate. I look forward to expanding and improving Wikipedia.
Mtmdem07:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I hereby nominate myself.
Oppose. Needs to demonstrate the claimed depth of knowledge, preparedness to deal with the grunt-work, and ability to interact with other users. --
Scott DavisTalk09:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Mtmdem started out editing articles pretty much the same way I did and seems to have many of the same interests. If he sticks around, I'm sure he will be a valuable asset to Wikipedia. However I have over 3 times as many edits as he does and would not even consider nominating myself at this point. Someone with 50+ total edits is not ready.
Martin-C09:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose This user really needs more experience on Wikipedia. However, I've seen a good start. I would reccomend re-nominating yourself in a month or two months if you want to be an admin and really feel that you're ready now.
Y0u(Y0ur talk page)(Y0ur contributions)16:45, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
A. I have nothing but contempt for vandals, and I will do by best to closely monitor and correct the acts of vandals.
B. I can "clean" current articles, checking for simply grammatical and spelling errors.
C. I can offer mediation in disputes among members and administrators.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. While I didn't write the whole article, I added a lot to the
Robert C. Byrd entry. I included more pictures, books, and quotes. I also brought the article up-to-date.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I have not encountered any conflict as of yet.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
mtmdem (
talk·contribs) – With a depth of knowledge in various issues, including the world government, politics, and history, I have a lot to contribute. Since most high-profile articles fall into this category, I can keep a close eye out for vandals and keep Wikipedia fair and accurate. I look forward to expanding and improving Wikipedia.
Mtmdem07:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I hereby nominate myself.
Oppose. Needs to demonstrate the claimed depth of knowledge, preparedness to deal with the grunt-work, and ability to interact with other users. --
Scott DavisTalk09:02, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Mtmdem started out editing articles pretty much the same way I did and seems to have many of the same interests. If he sticks around, I'm sure he will be a valuable asset to Wikipedia. However I have over 3 times as many edits as he does and would not even consider nominating myself at this point. Someone with 50+ total edits is not ready.
Martin-C09:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Weak oppose This user really needs more experience on Wikipedia. However, I've seen a good start. I would reccomend re-nominating yourself in a month or two months if you want to be an admin and really feel that you're ready now.
Y0u(Y0ur talk page)(Y0ur contributions)16:45, 16 October 2005 (UTC)reply
A. I have nothing but contempt for vandals, and I will do by best to closely monitor and correct the acts of vandals.
B. I can "clean" current articles, checking for simply grammatical and spelling errors.
C. I can offer mediation in disputes among members and administrators.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. While I didn't write the whole article, I added a lot to the
Robert C. Byrd entry. I included more pictures, books, and quotes. I also brought the article up-to-date.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I have not encountered any conflict as of yet.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.