Ww has been here since June and has >1500 edits. He expressed some interest in adminship, so I said I'd take a look through his contributions and nominate him if I liked what I saw. He's made good contributions to articles like Attack on Pearl Harbor and pseudoscience, and has greatly improved our coverage of cryptography topics. I didn't find any disputes he's been involved in, and he was polite in the one instance I found where he disagreed with someone (See User talk:Spellbot). He probably won't use admin powers much but I think he can be trusted not to abuse them. Isomorphic 01:32, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Support:
Ww has been here since June and has >1500 edits. He expressed some interest in adminship, so I said I'd take a look through his contributions and nominate him if I liked what I saw. He's made good contributions to articles like Attack on Pearl Harbor and pseudoscience, and has greatly improved our coverage of cryptography topics. I didn't find any disputes he's been involved in, and he was polite in the one instance I found where he disagreed with someone (See User talk:Spellbot). He probably won't use admin powers much but I think he can be trusted not to abuse them. Isomorphic 01:32, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Support: