final (48/1/0) ending 06:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Water Bottle (
talk·contribs) – I don't have too much to brag. I've been here for over an year now, I've been active in "inactive" areas in Wikipedia such as
WP:MF, and occasionally participate in AfD when I can. If relevant, I am an admin in Commons. --
WB05:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Changed from neutral, willing to let talk page edits by as great edit summary usage plus you do use user talk pages.
NSLE(
T+
C)06:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Support solid looking user, unlikely to abuse the tools and answers to the questions fine. Once again, a lack of understanding of the finer nuances of Wikipedia should be no bar. I'm an admin and I still make mistakes. Adminship is no big deal.
Hidingtalk16:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Clearly committed to the 'pedia and knows enough about policy and process to be an efficient and fair admin (without drowning in Wikipedia: space like I sometimes have).
Superm401 -
Talk07:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Not everything in Wikispace is a process. I hadn't noticed the FPC activity, but that was over half a year ago. My opinion is that since admins often adjudicate (or are otherwise involved in) process (e.g. *FD, VIP, FAC, RM etc) a candidate should have some experience with that before being mopified.
>Radiant<13:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit summary usage: 100% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.
Mathbot06:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. I'm interested in helping out in deleting images (speedy or not) as I do in Commons. Also moving articles and various other tasks.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I've been active in
WP:MF for the last few weeks, (that's why my edits are lowering down), where I have to contact various admins and ISPs who are mirroring Wikpedia without the correct copyrights. I made the templates and etc. for that project. Additionally, although somewhat inactive recently, I am responsible for creating the templates and basically most of the guessing system in
WP:HM. Article contributions can be found
here.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I had some minor discussions over use of images (see
User:Mike Garcia) and some templates, but none of them were major enough to note. I wasn't really stressed by any of them. As far as how I will deal with them in the future, I will go with assume good faith as much as possible and stay calm over the conversations.
4. Would you apply "ignore all rules" to your admin powers if you felt really strongly about something, even if other people disagreed?
Ashibakatock23:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
A. Depends on what kind of rule it is. I would most likely obey the rules like
WP:3RR and
WP:MOS nonetheless unless it was an extreme case (which I have yet to encounter).
5. How would you respond if another admin undid one of your admin actions without discussing it with you first (e.g. (un)blocking, (un)protecting, (un)deleting)?
Hermione198000:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)reply
A. Simply ask.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
final (48/1/0) ending 06:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Water Bottle (
talk·contribs) – I don't have too much to brag. I've been here for over an year now, I've been active in "inactive" areas in Wikipedia such as
WP:MF, and occasionally participate in AfD when I can. If relevant, I am an admin in Commons. --
WB05:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Changed from neutral, willing to let talk page edits by as great edit summary usage plus you do use user talk pages.
NSLE(
T+
C)06:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Support solid looking user, unlikely to abuse the tools and answers to the questions fine. Once again, a lack of understanding of the finer nuances of Wikipedia should be no bar. I'm an admin and I still make mistakes. Adminship is no big deal.
Hidingtalk16:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Support. Clearly committed to the 'pedia and knows enough about policy and process to be an efficient and fair admin (without drowning in Wikipedia: space like I sometimes have).
Superm401 -
Talk07:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Not everything in Wikispace is a process. I hadn't noticed the FPC activity, but that was over half a year ago. My opinion is that since admins often adjudicate (or are otherwise involved in) process (e.g. *FD, VIP, FAC, RM etc) a candidate should have some experience with that before being mopified.
>Radiant<13:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Edit summary usage: 100% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.
Mathbot06:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. I'm interested in helping out in deleting images (speedy or not) as I do in Commons. Also moving articles and various other tasks.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I've been active in
WP:MF for the last few weeks, (that's why my edits are lowering down), where I have to contact various admins and ISPs who are mirroring Wikpedia without the correct copyrights. I made the templates and etc. for that project. Additionally, although somewhat inactive recently, I am responsible for creating the templates and basically most of the guessing system in
WP:HM. Article contributions can be found
here.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I had some minor discussions over use of images (see
User:Mike Garcia) and some templates, but none of them were major enough to note. I wasn't really stressed by any of them. As far as how I will deal with them in the future, I will go with assume good faith as much as possible and stay calm over the conversations.
4. Would you apply "ignore all rules" to your admin powers if you felt really strongly about something, even if other people disagreed?
Ashibakatock23:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)reply
A. Depends on what kind of rule it is. I would most likely obey the rules like
WP:3RR and
WP:MOS nonetheless unless it was an extreme case (which I have yet to encounter).
5. How would you respond if another admin undid one of your admin actions without discussing it with you first (e.g. (un)blocking, (un)protecting, (un)deleting)?
Hermione198000:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)reply
A. Simply ask.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.