Vote here(47/0/1) ending 05:27 October 18, 2005 (UTC)
Tregoweth (
talk·contribs) – A HUGE help in helping slay vandals, especially in light of the all-out assault by the troll nicknamed "Mascot Guy." Great work, great fun and a great asset to this site. Please support! -
Lucky 6.9 05:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination.
tregoweth 06:08, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support
Extreme first support vote. I was going to nominate him myself, but I am a lazy slacker and I kept forgetting. Sorry.
Gamaliel 06:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Strong support. This user has put in an amazing number of edits (not to fall victim to editcountitis, but over 16,000 edits shows strong commitment to the project). I don't see any problems with giving Tregoweth the mop.
Ral315WS 06:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Aw, nuts! I forgot to support my own candidate! -
Lucky 6.9 17:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I hold any great vandal slayer in high regard, especially this one. Banes 17:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Oh, such a cliche, but still quite true: You mean he's not already an admin?! Yes, full Support; level-headed and even-handed and good vandal-fighter. --
Antaeus Feldspar 18:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC)reply
No, but he has written much less than any other candidate, it would have been better to specify what specific areas he was pleased with, and give examples of what conflicts he was involved in.
Astrotrain 21:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Comments
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. A lot of my edits now are housekeeping of one form or another (copyediting, reverting bad edits, watching for vandalism, etc.); I expect as a sysop I would continue this, along with helping other people with speedy deletes, page moves, renames, and all of the other things I've asked of admins. :)
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Probably my work on categories and disambiguation pages; I'm always pleased when I can make articles easier for someone to find.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I have had a few minor conflicts (usually resolved), and some users have caused me stress, but I try to remain calm and reasonable.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Vote here(47/0/1) ending 05:27 October 18, 2005 (UTC)
Tregoweth (
talk·contribs) – A HUGE help in helping slay vandals, especially in light of the all-out assault by the troll nicknamed "Mascot Guy." Great work, great fun and a great asset to this site. Please support! -
Lucky 6.9 05:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination.
tregoweth 06:08, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support
Extreme first support vote. I was going to nominate him myself, but I am a lazy slacker and I kept forgetting. Sorry.
Gamaliel 06:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Strong support. This user has put in an amazing number of edits (not to fall victim to editcountitis, but over 16,000 edits shows strong commitment to the project). I don't see any problems with giving Tregoweth the mop.
Ral315WS 06:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Aw, nuts! I forgot to support my own candidate! -
Lucky 6.9 17:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I hold any great vandal slayer in high regard, especially this one. Banes 17:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Oh, such a cliche, but still quite true: You mean he's not already an admin?! Yes, full Support; level-headed and even-handed and good vandal-fighter. --
Antaeus Feldspar 18:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC)reply
No, but he has written much less than any other candidate, it would have been better to specify what specific areas he was pleased with, and give examples of what conflicts he was involved in.
Astrotrain 21:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Comments
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. A lot of my edits now are housekeeping of one form or another (copyediting, reverting bad edits, watching for vandalism, etc.); I expect as a sysop I would continue this, along with helping other people with speedy deletes, page moves, renames, and all of the other things I've asked of admins. :)
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Probably my work on categories and disambiguation pages; I'm always pleased when I can make articles easier for someone to find.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I have had a few minor conflicts (usually resolved), and some users have caused me stress, but I try to remain calm and reasonable.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.