From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

SilverXDestiny

Final (0/4/0) Ended 02:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC) User is too inexperienced. WP:NOTYET. Sorry. -- Mr. Guye ( talk)

Nomination

SilverXDestiny ( talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER SilverXDestiny ( talk) 03:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I would like to apply for adminship because I saw how friendly and welcoming the admins were.

Despite the fact that I may not have many contributions, I can make up for it by my activity, grammar, cheerfulness, friendliness, and my hard-working character.

I have experience in writing novels and essays, and I am an admin on another website. I am essentially experienced as an admin.

I will try my best to contribute to the community; however, I do know my limits. I learned that I shouldn't overwork myself when I tried to make my sister the happiest in the world when I was little. I made gifts, cards, little stories, and everything. My sister loved them, but she grew unhappy when she saw how tired I was.

Please consider me for adminship.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: I intend to work with grammatical errors, articles about fictional works and countries, and I would also like to be welcoming to the new Wikipedians; for example, my little sister.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: I feel that every contribution that I make counts because I help the community, even if it is a little bit. I think everything a person does counts.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: As I am a friendly, cheerful person, I have not been in any conflict with other users.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion


Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Support


Oppose
  1. WP:SNOWBALL. Mlpearc ( open channel) 16:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  2. Please close this as WP:SNOW Coderzombie ( talk) 17:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose The account is just over 2 weeks old, clearly not even enough time to understand how Wikipedia works. Given time and work on thw project it may be worth a RFA down the road. As for right now I agree close this per WP:SNOW. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  4. Oppose New user. WP:NOTYET. Maybe later. I might close per WP:SNOW, WP:IAR.-- Mr. Guye ( talk) 22:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Neutral


General comments
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

SilverXDestiny

Final (0/4/0) Ended 02:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC) User is too inexperienced. WP:NOTYET. Sorry. -- Mr. Guye ( talk)

Nomination

SilverXDestiny ( talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER SilverXDestiny ( talk) 03:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I would like to apply for adminship because I saw how friendly and welcoming the admins were.

Despite the fact that I may not have many contributions, I can make up for it by my activity, grammar, cheerfulness, friendliness, and my hard-working character.

I have experience in writing novels and essays, and I am an admin on another website. I am essentially experienced as an admin.

I will try my best to contribute to the community; however, I do know my limits. I learned that I shouldn't overwork myself when I tried to make my sister the happiest in the world when I was little. I made gifts, cards, little stories, and everything. My sister loved them, but she grew unhappy when she saw how tired I was.

Please consider me for adminship.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: I intend to work with grammatical errors, articles about fictional works and countries, and I would also like to be welcoming to the new Wikipedians; for example, my little sister.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: I feel that every contribution that I make counts because I help the community, even if it is a little bit. I think everything a person does counts.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: As I am a friendly, cheerful person, I have not been in any conflict with other users.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion


Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Support


Oppose
  1. WP:SNOWBALL. Mlpearc ( open channel) 16:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  2. Please close this as WP:SNOW Coderzombie ( talk) 17:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  3. Oppose The account is just over 2 weeks old, clearly not even enough time to understand how Wikipedia works. Given time and work on thw project it may be worth a RFA down the road. As for right now I agree close this per WP:SNOW. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 17:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  4. Oppose New user. WP:NOTYET. Maybe later. I might close per WP:SNOW, WP:IAR.-- Mr. Guye ( talk) 22:35, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Neutral


General comments
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook