Final (58/3/1) Ended 21:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Sandstein ( talk · contribs) has fended off two offers to nominate thus far, but cannot hold out for ever! Sandstein joined us at the very end of July 2005 and rapidly started contributing to both the encyclopaedia and AfD debates. Fluent in English, German and with some French, also active on de: ( see his contribs there) as well as contributing many images to Commons ( see here). As if that were not enough, your review of Sandstein's contributions will also reveal substantial vandal-fighting activity, work at Articles for Creation, numerous contributions to deletion debates and reviews, helping at the Reference Desk, Third Opinion and other work around the project, and still finding time to make valuable contributions to the encyclopaedia. In RL, Sandstein is a jurist, which may well explain the measured tone of his contributions to many debates, plus he knows how to use a firearm and (much more importantly) when not to. Summon the nearest bureaucrat, I say, and issue him with mops, wiki, each: one, sysops for the use of. Guy ( Help!) 17:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Co-nomination: Given that I was the first one to ask Sandstein about nominating him for adminship, it is my pleasure to co-nominate him with Guy. I have crossed Sandstein's path many times on Wikipedia, not only because we have a topic of interest in common, but also because he seems to be at many places... There is not much I can add to Guy's compliments, except maybe to note that the many articles created by Sandstein are not just empty one-liners, but that many have resulted in Did you know? mentions. Back in May, I was already convinced that being a sysop would benefit both the encyclopedia (quite obvious) and himself (by making his housekeeping tasks simpler) — and I am even more convinced of this today. Schutz 13:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Optional question from Jorcogα
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Final (58/3/1) Ended 21:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Sandstein ( talk · contribs) has fended off two offers to nominate thus far, but cannot hold out for ever! Sandstein joined us at the very end of July 2005 and rapidly started contributing to both the encyclopaedia and AfD debates. Fluent in English, German and with some French, also active on de: ( see his contribs there) as well as contributing many images to Commons ( see here). As if that were not enough, your review of Sandstein's contributions will also reveal substantial vandal-fighting activity, work at Articles for Creation, numerous contributions to deletion debates and reviews, helping at the Reference Desk, Third Opinion and other work around the project, and still finding time to make valuable contributions to the encyclopaedia. In RL, Sandstein is a jurist, which may well explain the measured tone of his contributions to many debates, plus he knows how to use a firearm and (much more importantly) when not to. Summon the nearest bureaucrat, I say, and issue him with mops, wiki, each: one, sysops for the use of. Guy ( Help!) 17:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Co-nomination: Given that I was the first one to ask Sandstein about nominating him for adminship, it is my pleasure to co-nominate him with Guy. I have crossed Sandstein's path many times on Wikipedia, not only because we have a topic of interest in common, but also because he seems to be at many places... There is not much I can add to Guy's compliments, except maybe to note that the many articles created by Sandstein are not just empty one-liners, but that many have resulted in Did you know? mentions. Back in May, I was already convinced that being a sysop would benefit both the encyclopedia (quite obvious) and himself (by making his housekeeping tasks simpler) — and I am even more convinced of this today. Schutz 13:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Optional question from Jorcogα
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral