The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/7/0) ended 1:04, May 16, 2006 (UTC)

RAbbott ( talk · contribs) – Great guy, very talented and willing to work hard on Wikipedia! If you vote for me, you won't be dissapointed. Vote for me! RAbbott 22:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Accept

Support

Oppose

1. Please get more familiar with Wikipedia and its policies first; I urge you to withdraw this nomination. Thanks! Flcelloguy ( A note?) 23:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply
2. WP:SNOW. User created account today, has 15 total edits, copied another user's page (thanks, OhNoitsJamie) and gave himself Barnstars. (Edit: this comment was just purged by the candidate.) Radio Kirk talk to me 23:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply

   It is also highly likely that User:Rickabbo is the same person. Radio Kirk talk to me 23:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply

   He could have forgotten his password or even that he had an account. Both edits from that account are from August 2005. — Cuivi é nen ^{T| C}, Tuesday, 16 May 2006 @ 00:05 UTC

   'spossible... :) Radio Kirk talk to me 00:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

3. Strong Oppose First edit today? You need AT least 3-6 months on Wikipedia before becoming an admin. You need to get more familiar with the Wikipedia policies and I suggest withdrawl. ForestH2
4. Strong Oppose Unfortunately, anyone can say that he/she/it is willing to work really hard on Wikipedia, but that person may actually be a vandal. Renominate yourself (or wait for someone else to nominate you) after you've demonstrated devotion to working on Wikipedia, and then I'll change my vote. -- M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 23:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply
5. Strong Oppose One day of editing (which consisted of nothing but vanity edits and copying another user's userpage). OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 23:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply
6. Strong Oppose - here comes the pile on. Don't undo negative votes on your RfA. That's very wrong. - Richardcavell 00:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply
7. Strong Oppose. I'm sure the reason is quite clear..... I suggest withdrawl.— G. H e 00:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Neutral

Comments

User still hasn't answered any questions. ForestH2

• See RAbbott's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.
• Editcount using Interiot's tool as of 01:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC):

Username	RAbbott
Total edits	11
Distinct pages edited	8
Average edits/page	1.375
First edit	18:17, May 15, 2006
	
(main)	3
User	3
User talk	1
Image	1
Wikipedia	3

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.