Final (5/18/5); Closed by bibliomaniac15 on 05:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW. reply
Paste ( talk · contribs) – Paste Talk 14:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I have been active on Wikipedia for about 30 months with about 6500 edits, and find that as time goes by I am becoming more and more involved to a point where I would welcome being trusted with becoming an administrator and thus being able to more actively keep this valuable knowledge base as accurate as is possible in the circumstances.
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Optional question from Keepscases:
Optional question from Hoary (prompted by Ironholds's observation below, this is a follow-up to question 2 above):
Optional question from — neuro (talk)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Paste before commenting.
Neutral for now, but easily swayed. While your record seems pretty good, the 30 months is a bit misleading; you've been contributing regularly (i.e not 2 edits, then another five in 3 months) for about 12 (although that isn't a problem). The article-writing bugs me, though; while you do have a lot of articles to your name, the 10 random ones I opened up are start-class articles at best with no inline citations. To me this shows you're not too experienced with article structure, which begs the question: what else might you not be experienced at? As mentioned I can be swayed either way by evidence.
Ironholds (
talk) 14:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Switch to
reply
Final (5/18/5); Closed by bibliomaniac15 on 05:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW. reply
Paste ( talk · contribs) – Paste Talk 14:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I have been active on Wikipedia for about 30 months with about 6500 edits, and find that as time goes by I am becoming more and more involved to a point where I would welcome being trusted with becoming an administrator and thus being able to more actively keep this valuable knowledge base as accurate as is possible in the circumstances.
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Optional question from Keepscases:
Optional question from Hoary (prompted by Ironholds's observation below, this is a follow-up to question 2 above):
Optional question from — neuro (talk)
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Paste before commenting.
Neutral for now, but easily swayed. While your record seems pretty good, the 30 months is a bit misleading; you've been contributing regularly (i.e not 2 edits, then another five in 3 months) for about 12 (although that isn't a problem). The article-writing bugs me, though; while you do have a lot of articles to your name, the 10 random ones I opened up are start-class articles at best with no inline citations. To me this shows you're not too experienced with article structure, which begs the question: what else might you not be experienced at? As mentioned I can be swayed either way by evidence.
Ironholds (
talk) 14:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Switch to
reply