final (27/0/0) ending 16:52 Wednesday 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Pablo-flores (
talk·contribs) – Pablo has been a silent but steady contributor. His edits are countless (literally, since Kate's tool is down) but the last time I checked they were over 4200. He's been here for a long time and has displayed an amazing ability to copyedit, create new articles and stay on top of vandals. He is more than worthy of this privilege.
Sebastian KesselTalk 22:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)reply
According to Interiot's tool Pablo-flores has 4182 edits as of right now. The full edit count can be found
|hereKnowledgeOfSelf |
talk 19:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I feel flattered! I accept. --
Pablo D. Flores(
Talk) 21:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Comments
I would like to see more use of the edit summary but overall I think Pablo-flores does a very good job.
KnowledgeOfSelf |
talk 19:04, 9 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Point taken, will take care of that. May I note that Wednesday 16 December 2005 does not exist? Tomorrow is Wednesday 14. --
Pablo D. Flores(
Talk) 17:55, 13 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. Watching pages for minor vandalism. Not major controversial topics that attract vandals and trolls, but more especially the myriad common articles where silly vandalism may go unnoticed for a while.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Of the recent ones, the article about
Rosario (my native city) and its subarticles. I learned a lot creating or adding content to them, and I feel they can now convey that knowledge to readers. Of the older ones, linguistics articles such as
pro-drop language and
timing (linguistics).
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. A couple of users have actually caused me stress; I've chosen to stay back and cool down by myself while others took care of the matter. In one case I filed a
RfC on a problematic user. Other conflicts that I've participated in have been solved as they should, through discussion, or by the intervention of admins.
B. I'd say I'm not diplomatic, but I prefer to discuss rigorously. The best thing you can say about that is that I'll be the first to say "I don't know" when I really don't know.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
final (27/0/0) ending 16:52 Wednesday 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Pablo-flores (
talk·contribs) – Pablo has been a silent but steady contributor. His edits are countless (literally, since Kate's tool is down) but the last time I checked they were over 4200. He's been here for a long time and has displayed an amazing ability to copyedit, create new articles and stay on top of vandals. He is more than worthy of this privilege.
Sebastian KesselTalk 22:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)reply
According to Interiot's tool Pablo-flores has 4182 edits as of right now. The full edit count can be found
|hereKnowledgeOfSelf |
talk 19:03, 9 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I feel flattered! I accept. --
Pablo D. Flores(
Talk) 21:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Comments
I would like to see more use of the edit summary but overall I think Pablo-flores does a very good job.
KnowledgeOfSelf |
talk 19:04, 9 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Point taken, will take care of that. May I note that Wednesday 16 December 2005 does not exist? Tomorrow is Wednesday 14. --
Pablo D. Flores(
Talk) 17:55, 13 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. Watching pages for minor vandalism. Not major controversial topics that attract vandals and trolls, but more especially the myriad common articles where silly vandalism may go unnoticed for a while.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Of the recent ones, the article about
Rosario (my native city) and its subarticles. I learned a lot creating or adding content to them, and I feel they can now convey that knowledge to readers. Of the older ones, linguistics articles such as
pro-drop language and
timing (linguistics).
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. A couple of users have actually caused me stress; I've chosen to stay back and cool down by myself while others took care of the matter. In one case I filed a
RfC on a problematic user. Other conflicts that I've participated in have been solved as they should, through discussion, or by the intervention of admins.
B. I'd say I'm not diplomatic, but I prefer to discuss rigorously. The best thing you can say about that is that I'll be the first to say "I don't know" when I really don't know.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.