User:Niteowlneils

See User talk:Niteowlneils#When should Merovingian nominate?. It's late enough so that all the voters are happy. -- Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 07:45, May 28, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination, Merovingian. I accept. Realistically it probably won't change my activities much, as I mostly enjoy formatting and editing articles. But it would be nice to be able to revert faster, and leave a more standard message (so far I've usually just done a quick copy&paste of the date/time/user stamp of the version I'm reverting to), when doing RC patrol. I'd probably only help with the most blatant speedy delete candidates, and leave the more borderline cases to the more experienced admins. Niteowlneils 01:21, 30 May 2004 (UTC) reply

I did think of one other admin-ish thing I'd probably do on occasion--swap articles with redirs when the redir has the more common spelling or capitalization, such as prime meridian and Prime Meridian. Niteowlneils 23:47, 31 May 2004 (UTC) reply

It doesn't really effect how I'd act as an admin, but, just for the record, I have added a first draft trying to explain what I feel should be included, at User:Niteowlneils/WIWO Niteowlneils 08:41, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support:

1. Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 07:45, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
2. Kingturtle 07:52, 28 May 2004 (UTC) reply
3. Good work on VfD. Meelar 14:05, 28 May 2004 (UTC) reply
4. Turtles move very deliberately, I am told, so if Kingturtle approves, he must be here long enough. Besides, he has some gray hair, which indicates wisdom. -- Cecropia | Talk 14:19, 28 May 2004 (UTC) reply
5. Tuf-Kat 14:25, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
6. Chris 73 | Talk 15:08, 28 May 2004 (UTC) reply
7. BCorr| Брайен 16:10, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
8. Dori | Talk 16:11, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
9. jengod 16:25, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
10. Angela . 22:30, 29 May 2004 (UTC) reply
11. Jfdwolff | t@lk. Deletitionist of the scrupulous sort. 16:36, May 30 2004 (UTC)
12. Guan aco 16:01, 30 May 2004 (UTC) reply
13. Maximus Rex 18:13, 30 May 2004 (UTC) reply
14. Snowspinner 19:30, 30 May 2004 (UTC). I'd like to specifically note that I am not opposed to deletionist admins - I think admins should be a good mix of deletionists and inclusionists. reply
15. Support.  – Jrdioko (Talk) 19:47, 30 May 2004 (UTC) reply
16. I agree with Meelar, Jfdwolff, and Snowspinner. -- "DICK" CHENEY 22:22, 30 May 2004 (UTC) reply
17. Rick K 02:53, May 31, 2004 (UTC) Strongly support
18. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:27, 31 May 2004 (UTC) reply
19. ugen64 17:42, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
20. Jia ng 23:22, 31 May 2004 (UTC) reply
21. Certainly support. Good work on the tutorial. Isomorphic 06:00, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
22. Strongly support. Far from being a deletionist, he has saved many articles from VfD by researching / improving. SWAdair | Talk 09:00, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
23. It's a little earlier than I'd like, but I support reservedly. →Raul654 15:35, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)
24. +sj + 19:07, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC) "Two thumbs up. Way up!"
25. Cribcage 20:46, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
26. Danny 02:29, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
27. Tεx τ urε 18:18, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
28. 172 20:27, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
29. -- GeneralPatton 20:40, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) Good contributor
30. older≠ wiser 21:16, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
31. Thue 22:24, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comment:

How long has this user been here? →Raul654 07:50, May 28, 2004 (UTC)

4332 contribs since February 22, 2004. -- Merovingian ↕ T@Lk 07:55, May 28, 2004 (UTC)