From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/11/0) ended 16:32 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Naan Kadavul ( talk · contribs) – Dedication, concentration, and skill is needed to Wikipedia, this long withstanding project has helped many of the public across the globe in their research of modern and past history. This shall continue if you can vote for me, I shall put aside all vandalists. Now I have not got the power to get rid of them, please make me an admin so I can make Wikipedia a better place. Naan Kadavul 13:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination as all my spare time nowadays is put into improving Wikipedia.

Support

  1. You will recieve my support as you have spent mountains of time!!
    I'm User:Jayjig and I will support you on your Wikiquest.

Oppose

  1. Strong oppose, of course. 47 edits as of toolserver lag, forging support votes, 2 failed nom attempts. -- Rory096 15:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
    His upload log.... -- Rory096 15:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. This RfA is a total joke. -- Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 15:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Somebody delist this. Mackensen (talk) 15:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Per Mackensen. - Mailer Diablo 15:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Strong Oppose, impersonation of other users, low edit count, lacks of experience. Delist it, bad joke RFA. -- Ter e nc e Ong 15:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Strongest Oppose, per all the above, particularly stuffing of ballot. A bad joke. Consider a block for disruption if bad faith can be conclusively demonstrated. Badgerpatrol 15:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Strong Oppose, only present for 10 days? It takes months to learn how to work as an admin! Sorry man... -- Ton e 15:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Speedy Oppose (is there such thing ?) Suggest B'Crat early closure, and think pile on oppose votes would be of little benefit, as it all seems to be said in the first few! MartinRe 15:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Strong Oppose as per Rory's comments on AN:I. May need a block for disruption aside from this disaster. -- InShaneee 16:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Oppose One day you may make a fine admin, but it usually takes a few months of time on wikipedia and a few thousand edits before that time comes. You also haven't completed your RFA as you never inserted the time of closing at the top. You may want to consider withdrawing your RFA and reapplying in a few months time. -- Bachrach44 16:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
    I doubt that will be happening, as he's indefinitely blocked. -- Rory096 16:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  11. Strong oppose for the same reasons mentioned above; I strongly advise the candidate to withdraw the nomination until a lot more experience has been gained. Buck ets ofg 16:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
    The candidate is currently blocked for disruption and vote forgery, someone else will have to withdraw for him. Crat's around? JoshuaZ 16:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Neutral

Comments

Username	Naan_Kadavul
Total edits	280
Distinct pages edited	76
Average edits/page	3.684
First edit	13:10, May 1, 2006
	
(main)	192
User	11
User talk	13
Image	52
Wikipedia	12

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Cricket related work, Football - Premiership and Championship. Come on u Gunners in the Champions league, Tamil Film Industry, Hollywood Movies, Actors, Actresses, Physics, Business Studies, Maths theories.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: My home page is about me. But I am not so famous that my name should appear on specific articles.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I see how it goes, then post a message on a notice board for discussion, if this doen't work i tell an admin to sort out differences. I am looking to become an admin to help the rest of the Wikipedia users.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Final (0/11/0) ended 16:32 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Naan Kadavul ( talk · contribs) – Dedication, concentration, and skill is needed to Wikipedia, this long withstanding project has helped many of the public across the globe in their research of modern and past history. This shall continue if you can vote for me, I shall put aside all vandalists. Now I have not got the power to get rid of them, please make me an admin so I can make Wikipedia a better place. Naan Kadavul 13:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination as all my spare time nowadays is put into improving Wikipedia.

Support

  1. You will recieve my support as you have spent mountains of time!!
    I'm User:Jayjig and I will support you on your Wikiquest.

Oppose

  1. Strong oppose, of course. 47 edits as of toolserver lag, forging support votes, 2 failed nom attempts. -- Rory096 15:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
    His upload log.... -- Rory096 15:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  2. This RfA is a total joke. -- Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 15:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  3. Somebody delist this. Mackensen (talk) 15:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  4. Per Mackensen. - Mailer Diablo 15:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  5. Strong Oppose, impersonation of other users, low edit count, lacks of experience. Delist it, bad joke RFA. -- Ter e nc e Ong 15:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  6. Strongest Oppose, per all the above, particularly stuffing of ballot. A bad joke. Consider a block for disruption if bad faith can be conclusively demonstrated. Badgerpatrol 15:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  7. Strong Oppose, only present for 10 days? It takes months to learn how to work as an admin! Sorry man... -- Ton e 15:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  8. Speedy Oppose (is there such thing ?) Suggest B'Crat early closure, and think pile on oppose votes would be of little benefit, as it all seems to be said in the first few! MartinRe 15:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  9. Strong Oppose as per Rory's comments on AN:I. May need a block for disruption aside from this disaster. -- InShaneee 16:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  10. Oppose One day you may make a fine admin, but it usually takes a few months of time on wikipedia and a few thousand edits before that time comes. You also haven't completed your RFA as you never inserted the time of closing at the top. You may want to consider withdrawing your RFA and reapplying in a few months time. -- Bachrach44 16:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
    I doubt that will be happening, as he's indefinitely blocked. -- Rory096 16:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
  11. Strong oppose for the same reasons mentioned above; I strongly advise the candidate to withdraw the nomination until a lot more experience has been gained. Buck ets ofg 16:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply
    The candidate is currently blocked for disruption and vote forgery, someone else will have to withdraw for him. Crat's around? JoshuaZ 16:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Neutral

Comments

Username	Naan_Kadavul
Total edits	280
Distinct pages edited	76
Average edits/page	3.684
First edit	13:10, May 1, 2006
	
(main)	192
User	11
User talk	13
Image	52
Wikipedia	12

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Cricket related work, Football - Premiership and Championship. Come on u Gunners in the Champions league, Tamil Film Industry, Hollywood Movies, Actors, Actresses, Physics, Business Studies, Maths theories.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: My home page is about me. But I am not so famous that my name should appear on specific articles.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I see how it goes, then post a message on a notice board for discussion, if this doen't work i tell an admin to sort out differences. I am looking to become an admin to help the rest of the Wikipedia users.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook