Final (5/26/7). Unsuccessful. Closed early by WJBscribe @ 22:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Mr little irish ( talk · contribs) – Being an editor for almost two years, I now almost fully understand most, if not all, WP policies and guidelines. I feel that I can be usefull towards the project with my level of WP:CLUE and level headedness. I have decided to nominate myself so as not to put strain or pressure on nominators as I have seen in previous RfA's. I have been inactive alot recently, which contributes to my low edit count however I am now back to edit and learn more and more about this wonderful project. As a note, I'm not very good at writing a big paragraph for direct questions (such as the first three default questions) as I feel that a simple question should have a simple answer. If you are not happy with an answer, please don't hestitate on asking me to elaborate. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 15:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Additional question by Carrite:
Additional optional question by TParis:
Unrelated: To start, I've seen some banner somewhere (I think it was above my watch list). Well not a banner, but a notification, that there is an ongoing RFC on renaming the abortion articles?
Note: I refer to both editors as him/he but I do not expect them both to be male or female. It just helped me word it better. Now, there are a couple of factors that come into play in this senario;
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Also, for future reference, you should delete the nomination sentence when self-nominating. I'd hat to see you get opposes based on technical errors with the process. — GabeMc ( talk) 02:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Final (5/26/7). Unsuccessful. Closed early by WJBscribe @ 22:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Mr little irish ( talk · contribs) – Being an editor for almost two years, I now almost fully understand most, if not all, WP policies and guidelines. I feel that I can be usefull towards the project with my level of WP:CLUE and level headedness. I have decided to nominate myself so as not to put strain or pressure on nominators as I have seen in previous RfA's. I have been inactive alot recently, which contributes to my low edit count however I am now back to edit and learn more and more about this wonderful project. As a note, I'm not very good at writing a big paragraph for direct questions (such as the first three default questions) as I feel that a simple question should have a simple answer. If you are not happy with an answer, please don't hestitate on asking me to elaborate. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 15:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Additional question by Carrite:
Additional optional question by TParis:
Unrelated: To start, I've seen some banner somewhere (I think it was above my watch list). Well not a banner, but a notification, that there is an ongoing RFC on renaming the abortion articles?
Note: I refer to both editors as him/he but I do not expect them both to be male or female. It just helped me word it better. Now, there are a couple of factors that come into play in this senario;
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Also, for future reference, you should delete the nomination sentence when self-nominating. I'd hat to see you get opposes based on technical errors with the process. — GabeMc ( talk) 02:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |