Support. I found this user to be able to discuss contentious issues in a reasonable manner, showing respect for sources, as well as differing opinions. I think they will use any authority granted them in a cautious, and judicious manner.
Jack 21:54, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Support cautiously. I think he's a fine user with a good track record, but he hasn't been here as long as I'd like. But, with the new de-sysop option, I'm more encouraged to support him.
→Raul654 01:27, Feb 1, 2004 (UTC)
What do people think about Mikkalai separating out the story of the lost Jews of
Carpathian Ruthenia into a separate ghetto article? How about suppression of information? Does Mikkalai show admin behavior? This may be an interesting contributor in his fields, but not an appropriate admin, IMO.
Wetman 04:44, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)
I have reviewed the above objection, and I do not see it as substantive in regards to Mikkalai's request for adminship. This appears to be a very tender subject, w unfriendliness on the talk (which Mikkalai has not engaged in) and to be perfectly frank, I agree w what Mikkalai did, creating a seperate article for a contentious issue. The
Carpathian Ruthenia needs alot of work, and he seems to be a part of making it better.
Jack 07:31, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Strongly support! I totally concur with both of JackLynch's statements above. He'd make a great member of the conflict resolution team as well.
172 02:11, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Support. I found this user to be able to discuss contentious issues in a reasonable manner, showing respect for sources, as well as differing opinions. I think they will use any authority granted them in a cautious, and judicious manner.
Jack 21:54, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Support cautiously. I think he's a fine user with a good track record, but he hasn't been here as long as I'd like. But, with the new de-sysop option, I'm more encouraged to support him.
→Raul654 01:27, Feb 1, 2004 (UTC)
What do people think about Mikkalai separating out the story of the lost Jews of
Carpathian Ruthenia into a separate ghetto article? How about suppression of information? Does Mikkalai show admin behavior? This may be an interesting contributor in his fields, but not an appropriate admin, IMO.
Wetman 04:44, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)
I have reviewed the above objection, and I do not see it as substantive in regards to Mikkalai's request for adminship. This appears to be a very tender subject, w unfriendliness on the talk (which Mikkalai has not engaged in) and to be perfectly frank, I agree w what Mikkalai did, creating a seperate article for a contentious issue. The
Carpathian Ruthenia needs alot of work, and he seems to be a part of making it better.
Jack 07:31, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Strongly support! I totally concur with both of JackLynch's statements above. He'd make a great member of the conflict resolution team as well.
172 02:11, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)