Matt Crypto has 6541 contributions since 10 Mar 2004. As befits his username, his contributions focus heavily on articles related to cryptography. He has shown a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and is respectful of other editors, so I think we would benefit from his help as an administrator. --
Michael Snow 16:39, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I accept the nomination.
— Matt 17:32, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
David Remahl 18:20, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC) !! I am qute surprised to learn that he wasn't an admin and that he only joined this March!
As part of the crypto cabal, how can I vote no? Seriously though, this is a no brainer. I thought he already was an admin.
CryptoDerk 19:18, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
A. Not as much as some! In addition to bits of housekeeping in crypto articles (page renames and the like), I'd watch Recent Changes more regularly.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. vndd, l rlr t dgs ga vgjc gy
Rtst Nywjqmslgy Estyrtjr, vilwi nyrnr km te t antskjnr tjslwdn, eg l vte zklsn mdntenr vlsi sits. l tdeg zklsn dlcn sin vtq sin rltfjtoe agj
ANTD tyr
LRNT wton gks.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. Happily, most of the articles I edit are pretty uncontroversial (read "boring"!). There was the somewhat embarrassing (and unresolved)
Great Spelling Debate...but seriously, I think there's few editing disagreements that can't be solved by good-natured discussion.
— Matt 11:15, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Matt Crypto has 6541 contributions since 10 Mar 2004. As befits his username, his contributions focus heavily on articles related to cryptography. He has shown a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and is respectful of other editors, so I think we would benefit from his help as an administrator. --
Michael Snow 16:39, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
I accept the nomination.
— Matt 17:32, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
David Remahl 18:20, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC) !! I am qute surprised to learn that he wasn't an admin and that he only joined this March!
As part of the crypto cabal, how can I vote no? Seriously though, this is a no brainer. I thought he already was an admin.
CryptoDerk 19:18, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
A. Not as much as some! In addition to bits of housekeeping in crypto articles (page renames and the like), I'd watch Recent Changes more regularly.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. vndd, l rlr t dgs ga vgjc gy
Rtst Nywjqmslgy Estyrtjr, vilwi nyrnr km te t antskjnr tjslwdn, eg l vte zklsn mdntenr vlsi sits. l tdeg zklsn dlcn sin vtq sin rltfjtoe agj
ANTD tyr
LRNT wton gks.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. Happily, most of the articles I edit are pretty uncontroversial (read "boring"!). There was the somewhat embarrassing (and unresolved)
Great Spelling Debate...but seriously, I think there's few editing disagreements that can't be solved by good-natured discussion.
— Matt 11:15, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)