KF has been here for two years and has made approximately 7,000 edits, to literary and geographic topics and many others. KF is also a prolific copy editor and is active reverting vandalism. I offer this nomination with KF's permission.
Candidate assumed to accept nomination by virtue of answering generic question
No need for any long discussions on my account. I thought I had accepted my nomination
there. Well, I obviously haven't, so once again: I hereby accept my nomination.
<KF> 04:59, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
A. I would continue reverting pages in cases of vandalism and I would want to deal with requests for undeletion, having myself experienced on a number of occasions how easily articles (or at least stubs) which are worth keeping are mistakenly speedy-deleted.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I used to be pleased with my introduction to
crime fiction before it was cut up and distributed all over Wikipedia. (Fortunately, whoever is interested in my original article can still access the old version. Generally, being able to do that is really one of the good features of Wikipedia.) I think the biography of
Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky is quite good, and I'm watching over
List of literary works with eponymous heroines because I believe nowhere else can one find such a list.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. I had an argument with
Maveric 149 ages ago about NPOV in
Losers in literature (which has been renamed since). More recently, there was some dispute about the
Gallagher disambiguation page, but both "conflicts" are hardly worth mentioning. Generally, I think it's a ridiculous idea having a nervous breakdown while you're all alone in your room in front of your PC. I'm not quite that peaceful in real life.
<KF> 11:48, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
KF has been here for two years and has made approximately 7,000 edits, to literary and geographic topics and many others. KF is also a prolific copy editor and is active reverting vandalism. I offer this nomination with KF's permission.
Candidate assumed to accept nomination by virtue of answering generic question
No need for any long discussions on my account. I thought I had accepted my nomination
there. Well, I obviously haven't, so once again: I hereby accept my nomination.
<KF> 04:59, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
A. I would continue reverting pages in cases of vandalism and I would want to deal with requests for undeletion, having myself experienced on a number of occasions how easily articles (or at least stubs) which are worth keeping are mistakenly speedy-deleted.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I used to be pleased with my introduction to
crime fiction before it was cut up and distributed all over Wikipedia. (Fortunately, whoever is interested in my original article can still access the old version. Generally, being able to do that is really one of the good features of Wikipedia.) I think the biography of
Margarete Schütte-Lihotzky is quite good, and I'm watching over
List of literary works with eponymous heroines because I believe nowhere else can one find such a list.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. I had an argument with
Maveric 149 ages ago about NPOV in
Losers in literature (which has been renamed since). More recently, there was some dispute about the
Gallagher disambiguation page, but both "conflicts" are hardly worth mentioning. Generally, I think it's a ridiculous idea having a nervous breakdown while you're all alone in your room in front of your PC. I'm not quite that peaceful in real life.
<KF> 11:48, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)